AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,0/10
3,7 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe controversial story of a lone genius who closes down the Las Vegas Strip... The goverment can't stop him. As he reunites with his dead girlfriend each night.The controversial story of a lone genius who closes down the Las Vegas Strip... The goverment can't stop him. As he reunites with his dead girlfriend each night.The controversial story of a lone genius who closes down the Las Vegas Strip... The goverment can't stop him. As he reunites with his dead girlfriend each night.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Robert DiFrancesco
- Agent
- (as Robert Di Francesco)
Avaliações em destaque
I saw a segment from the web-show 'Best of the Worst' which featured clips from this... do we call it a 'film'(?) It made me intrigued by just how insane the actor-writer-producer-director (also caterer-production manager-designer-music-score etc etc) Neil Breen made this tone poem about a man who becomes a sort of weapon against the world while also having the super-human ability to heal people with brain cancer and yet spends all of his time in the desert, living off of tuna fish cans and his several laptops where he organizes his plans to dominate and possibly blow up the world but hey it's okay because he "supports the troops" and mourns for his dead wife which... how did she die again?!
This movie is utter, incomprehensible nonsense of a magnificent order. You can't believe what is before your eyes exists, but apparently through the sheer will-power of ego and drive, one man can make a movie by himself basically single-handedly - well, also, a lot, and I mean a LOT, of stock footage helps. Not to say the other actors (are they actors) help much (they don't), or any sense of forward momentum or drive. It almost appears like it's some sort of desperate plea in the guise of an espionage thriller narrative (hell, even on the front cover of the DVD the quote says "Stunning... desperation..." as if the critic, if it was one, was marking this as a cry for help).
At the same time as an ego-trip spectacle of the worst order, it may be more unwatchable than The Room; at least in the case of Tommy Wiseau, he had a certain oddball, off-the-wall charm and deranged charisma (or just bafflement) that could keep your eyes glued. What makes Neil Breen such a train-wreck to watch is more-so the filmmaking, how it is apparently shot on film in 2005 but he and everything else looks like it was shot in the early 80's, and is over-loaded with a gargantuan amount of narration, and at times one wonders if this Neil Breen whoever has telekinetic capabilities with those he acts across on screen since he talks and we hear it without him moving his mouth (!)
It's not a sight to recommend legitimately in any way shape or form - matter of fact it's one of the ten worst things ever committed to celluloid, like you halfway expect for the Beast at Yucca Flats to arrive - but if you decide to watch it with friends, it will be one of the great bonding experiences of your lives. Watching Double Down is like going through the trenches with an A-grade certified psycho who is full of himself and tuna and the electronic impulses giving him a heartbeat for some reason.
This movie is utter, incomprehensible nonsense of a magnificent order. You can't believe what is before your eyes exists, but apparently through the sheer will-power of ego and drive, one man can make a movie by himself basically single-handedly - well, also, a lot, and I mean a LOT, of stock footage helps. Not to say the other actors (are they actors) help much (they don't), or any sense of forward momentum or drive. It almost appears like it's some sort of desperate plea in the guise of an espionage thriller narrative (hell, even on the front cover of the DVD the quote says "Stunning... desperation..." as if the critic, if it was one, was marking this as a cry for help).
At the same time as an ego-trip spectacle of the worst order, it may be more unwatchable than The Room; at least in the case of Tommy Wiseau, he had a certain oddball, off-the-wall charm and deranged charisma (or just bafflement) that could keep your eyes glued. What makes Neil Breen such a train-wreck to watch is more-so the filmmaking, how it is apparently shot on film in 2005 but he and everything else looks like it was shot in the early 80's, and is over-loaded with a gargantuan amount of narration, and at times one wonders if this Neil Breen whoever has telekinetic capabilities with those he acts across on screen since he talks and we hear it without him moving his mouth (!)
It's not a sight to recommend legitimately in any way shape or form - matter of fact it's one of the ten worst things ever committed to celluloid, like you halfway expect for the Beast at Yucca Flats to arrive - but if you decide to watch it with friends, it will be one of the great bonding experiences of your lives. Watching Double Down is like going through the trenches with an A-grade certified psycho who is full of himself and tuna and the electronic impulses giving him a heartbeat for some reason.
I guess it was okay, but there wasn't enough laptops and climbing slightly steep hills.
I don't even know if it's a movie. What is this film about? Why are there Stock's videos? Did Neil record this movie with a Nokia 3310? So many questions, so few answers.
The movie was so bad that it was funny. He got a 2/10 - half star more than 1/10 for nice bare female ass in the pool, another half star more for Neil's effort to collect all those broken laptops and phones from the garbage dumps.
This is Neil's worst film in his entire "rich" film portfolio. There are only few things to laugh at, because movie is so super serious. There is no robotic Jesus Neil, Neil isn't the most intelligent man in the world, and he doesn't play the role of the Messiah hacker. He's simply a bioterrorist who has delusions. You can see that Neil was still a modest guy when writing his first film. Ah, that Neil... How can you not love him?
P. S. But seriously now - what did he make this film about?
The movie was so bad that it was funny. He got a 2/10 - half star more than 1/10 for nice bare female ass in the pool, another half star more for Neil's effort to collect all those broken laptops and phones from the garbage dumps.
This is Neil's worst film in his entire "rich" film portfolio. There are only few things to laugh at, because movie is so super serious. There is no robotic Jesus Neil, Neil isn't the most intelligent man in the world, and he doesn't play the role of the Messiah hacker. He's simply a bioterrorist who has delusions. You can see that Neil was still a modest guy when writing his first film. Ah, that Neil... How can you not love him?
P. S. But seriously now - what did he make this film about?
I don't need much to live on anymore. I just eat tuna out of the can and live in the car.
Not only did I gain nothing from watching this film, I believe it took something from me.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesNone of the computers used in the film are ever on nor seem to be working.
- Citações
Aaron Brand: I can't go on with this. I can't go on with this! I'm an American! I'm an American, I love this country! My country.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosLighting - None
Make-Up and Hair - None
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Двойной провал
- Locações de filme
- Las Vegas, Nevada, EUA(The Desert/City/Stock footage)
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 33 min(93 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente