A tentativa brutal de vingança de um homem gera riscos para toda a nação depois que ele é revelado como sendo ex-agente de uma organização poderosa e clandestina conhecida como "Beekeepers".A tentativa brutal de vingança de um homem gera riscos para toda a nação depois que ele é revelado como sendo ex-agente de uma organização poderosa e clandestina conhecida como "Beekeepers".A tentativa brutal de vingança de um homem gera riscos para toda a nação depois que ele é revelado como sendo ex-agente de uma organização poderosa e clandestina conhecida como "Beekeepers".
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 6 indicações no total
Resumo
Reviewers say 'The Beekeeper' is an action-packed film with Jason Statham's intense performance. Themes of revenge, corporate greed, and online scams are prominent. Critics praise Statham and the action sequences but criticize the lack of originality, predictable plot, and bee metaphors. Some appreciate the social commentary, while others find the script and supporting cast lacking. The film is entertaining but not groundbreaking, with mixed opinions on its quality.
Avaliações em destaque
A solid popcorn action flick. Jason is his standard typecast role, which you can't blame him for, he's a one trick pony but that one trick is entertaining.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
So I rated this higher than it has a right to be rated but I don't want to take away from what could've been and what could be if there is a sequel.
This clandestine organization known as the Beekeepers is really compelling. I love the idea of this movie. However, the only good thing about this was Jason Statham and Jeremy Irons. The supporting actors were horrible and cartoonish. It went from being prospectively a terrific movie in the beginning, to just comical and not in a good B-movie (no pun intended) type of way.
The thing that destroyed this movie was the character writing. Statham's character didn't have much background and was an easy write as a typical elite action hero. Even so, they gave him some cheesy dialogue at times. Jeremy Irons was the only realistic character. Everyone else, especially the money folks, were like goofy caricatures of cartoon villains. His FBI tail, being his neighbor's (that he is avenging) daughter, had the most unrealistic plot line and character development you can imagine. She had zero grief nor internal conflict displayed. If they had gone a more serious direction, this movie would've been knockout. They should make a sequel with better writing.
This clandestine organization known as the Beekeepers is really compelling. I love the idea of this movie. However, the only good thing about this was Jason Statham and Jeremy Irons. The supporting actors were horrible and cartoonish. It went from being prospectively a terrific movie in the beginning, to just comical and not in a good B-movie (no pun intended) type of way.
The thing that destroyed this movie was the character writing. Statham's character didn't have much background and was an easy write as a typical elite action hero. Even so, they gave him some cheesy dialogue at times. Jeremy Irons was the only realistic character. Everyone else, especially the money folks, were like goofy caricatures of cartoon villains. His FBI tail, being his neighbor's (that he is avenging) daughter, had the most unrealistic plot line and character development you can imagine. She had zero grief nor internal conflict displayed. If they had gone a more serious direction, this movie would've been knockout. They should make a sequel with better writing.
Statham knows how to fight. The action is great.
The dialogs and the plot... oh my God. This was all written by a 15 year old as a weekend project.
It's all beyond ridiculous.
Even Statham's usual delivery can't salvage the "zinger" phrases in this movie. Not even that.
Still, the action is good.
Watch it for the action. With beer. With friends around, making fun of all the silly and teenage-amateurish dialogs.
You'll walk out thinking that you should not have enjoyed this horrible movie, and that you can also be a Hollywood screenwriter. Easily.
By the way, they spent 40 million to do this... I can only imagine Statham walked out of the movie loaded.
The dialogs and the plot... oh my God. This was all written by a 15 year old as a weekend project.
It's all beyond ridiculous.
Even Statham's usual delivery can't salvage the "zinger" phrases in this movie. Not even that.
Still, the action is good.
Watch it for the action. With beer. With friends around, making fun of all the silly and teenage-amateurish dialogs.
You'll walk out thinking that you should not have enjoyed this horrible movie, and that you can also be a Hollywood screenwriter. Easily.
By the way, they spent 40 million to do this... I can only imagine Statham walked out of the movie loaded.
Every scene with her was awful. Terrible delivery, unlikeable personality and the acting skills that belong in a bottom-of-the-barrel movie with no budget. The goofy outfits don't help either, (wait until you see her FBI outfit toward the end, cringe). Her and Ruby Rose should make a movie together so no one will watch it. On a side note- her FBI partner looks like the singer from SOTD. Chop Suey!
Statham delivers as usual and knows to stay in his lane. He plays the same character in all his movies but it's entertaining as usual. Jeremy Irons did fine too, I haven't seen much of him since...Die Hard with a Vengeance???
There's an explosion at the beginning of the movie that was laughingly bad...I thought I was watching a movie from The Asylum for a second. But then there's another explosion that looks really good a bit later on, so I'm confused there's such a big difference in the effects.
I see there's a sequel coming and hopefully they get better writers next time around because the only reason to watch this movie is Jason Statham and even then the story was kinda paper thin and borderline silly. Plus it was difficult having to listen to some of the dialogue from most of the characters as well.
Statham delivers as usual and knows to stay in his lane. He plays the same character in all his movies but it's entertaining as usual. Jeremy Irons did fine too, I haven't seen much of him since...Die Hard with a Vengeance???
There's an explosion at the beginning of the movie that was laughingly bad...I thought I was watching a movie from The Asylum for a second. But then there's another explosion that looks really good a bit later on, so I'm confused there's such a big difference in the effects.
I see there's a sequel coming and hopefully they get better writers next time around because the only reason to watch this movie is Jason Statham and even then the story was kinda paper thin and borderline silly. Plus it was difficult having to listen to some of the dialogue from most of the characters as well.
Action flicks aren't known for their plots. That being said, is it possible to finally have at least somewhat plausible plotlines? I mean it's just so... stupid, I can't really .... My almost 80 year old parents know more about computers than these morons in the movies and many more examples of that.
The action is great, as usual in Statham movies. That's why I even considered to write a review. It's everything one might expect from his action flick. As always he is the one who carries the movie throughout, and despite all the stupidity, it actually works. You probably need to be pretty drunk, but when you are, it's actually fun.
So, as a one time entertainment, it's actually worth it.
The action is great, as usual in Statham movies. That's why I even considered to write a review. It's everything one might expect from his action flick. As always he is the one who carries the movie throughout, and despite all the stupidity, it actually works. You probably need to be pretty drunk, but when you are, it's actually fun.
So, as a one time entertainment, it's actually worth it.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesDue to the tight production budget ($34 million) the majority of the film was shot in the UK to qualify for UK tax relief.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt around 46 minutes, an FBI tactical unit is stopped from proceeding by the leader of the private security company waving a sheet claiming his team are there on the direct orders of the Governor, and tells the FBI tactical team to leave. This is absolutely not true in real life. The FBI is a federal agency and is not under any direct state control by any governor of a state.
- Citações
Agent Verona Parker: I believe you. But there are laws for that.
Adam Clay: There are laws for that. Until they fail. Then they've got me.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe opening titles appear over a montage of footage of bees and historical records of bees.
- Versões alternativasGerman TV version is cut by 5 minutes overall to secure a "not under 16" rating. The "not under 18" rated version elsewhere is completely uncensored.
- ConexõesFeatured in OWV Updates: OWV Cinema Poster Update (16/01/2024) (2024)
- Trilhas sonorasBreath
Performed by RiLLA*
Written by James Damon Woodford
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Beekeeper?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Beekeeper: Sentencia De Muerte
- Locações de filme
- Kingsferry Bridge, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(elevator bridge scene)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 40.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 66.220.535
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 16.576.007
- 14 de jan. de 2024
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 162.619.535
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 45 min(105 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente