O problema com Jon Stewart

Update: After watching a few episodes. I have changed my views. Jon is very cautious about what he says. He just utters what his left leaning writer would write for him.

Great to see that the legends has return.

The show separates itself from what the talk shows has become in the last 5-6 years.

Shows the real problem of the society w/o choosing a political side. Reminds me of how great The Daily Show and Colbert Report used to be.

I remember a video by Hbomberguy about politics in video games had something like this: "People don't dislike politics in video games, it depends on the kinds of politics you put in video games and if they like it."

I'm 26 this year. I remember watching Jon's daily show back in 2007. To me, Jon didn't change that much. Still passionate about the hypocrisies and inequalities in America. Still funny in many ways, even when talking about heavy topics. The topics he talked about did changed somewhat, but not that much. From Bush to Trump and Biden, but still all the hypocrisies. From "class warfare" (que world of warcraft parody) to ... still class warfare. From white privilege to structural racism. Frankly, it is quite astonishing to see a country that couldn't even try to fix its fundamental problems for such a long time, it is almost humiliating. Jon is still illuminating in his new show, bring carefully researched heavy hitting pieces to us, albeit in a slightly different format now.

What changed, then? Why do so many people hate Jon's new show now?

The most complain I see people make is that "there is no comedy, no jokes" here. Another one might be "people don't need to know more about the fundamental problems in this country anymore."

Both criticism have some legitimacy, but to sum it all up, it is that "Time has changed."

We no longer live in a society where carefully researched and funny political commentaries are so rare. We live in a society with a Infodemic problem, where information overload happens everywhere.

Jon's core audience, from both the past (40s~50s) and the present(10s~30s) understand the fundamental problems of America. We are constantly bombarded by the spillover of these problems everyday.

Mass shooting, discrimination, democracy rollback, having boomers controlling the vast majority of political sphere, inequalities, NIMBY attitudes. We all know that, and we all know we can do nothing about that. We all know America needs a revolution, a massacre, a bloodshed to change its core. However, Jon's previous core audience is no longer in the position of doing that now. They followed jon 20 years ago, but now they are in their 40s or 50s, and are the major money maker and consumer in this country. They don't want to be reminded of the dirtiness of their country, their work, because they directly benefit from it. They no longer have the wit, or wish, to change the society.

It is not, and I quote from ryardley-73707, that "he has turned in to the exact people he used to make fun of." It is that his past audience has become the exact problem he is criticizing.

It is not Jon using the same buzz word everyone is using that is "nothing insightful", it is they don't like the buzz word Jon's using.

It is not Jon is no longer funny. It is that the audience no longer find the issue funny.

Again to reiterate my point, Jon didn't change, the time has changed. Instead of listening to his fans from 20 years ago, I suggest listening to the people in their 20s now. What do they think about "The Problem with Jon Stewart"? The answer should be clear as day.

Although to be fair, this show is not perfect for everyone (thus the 9/10).

I was ECSTATIC when I heard Jon Stewart was producing a new show. I am desperately in need of another news source that has just enough comedy to keep me from throwing heavy, pointy things at the screen in anger. This is *almost* it.

Laughter is what keeps despair away, despair that has loomed all too large these last many years, and my sense of humor is so dark Anish Kapoor wanted to co-opt it for his exclusive use. However there just wasn't the sharp, dry, cutting dark humor I was hoping for in the first episode.

They do an excellent job of laying out the issues, and presenting various aspects of a complex problem in a clear way... and then... that's it.

With not enough humor, a resolution, or a call to action, then it has the impact of a long format click-bait article that gets one all wound up and pissed off, and then left feeling impotent and powerless in the face of such a massive, systemic problem.

That's how I've been feeling far too often over the last 5? 50? Years (I've lost count, time lost all meaning once I started seeing pajama pants as acceptable to leave the house in and had to start genuinely helping my tween do math) and I desperately NEED to feel like I can do SOMETHING, ANYTHING. Send a mildly offensive postcard to someone, buy a sarcastic stuffed animal, tweet a snarky meme to help raise money, or just scan a QR code that pops up on the screen at the end that will auto deduct $10 from ApplePay for a related charity... SOMETHING.

You did a great job of bringing these issues to our attention Jon, and getting us all passionate about it, don't leave us here with activist blue balls... tell us how the people in your show need help so we can ALL have a "happy ending."

From the first episode Jon immediately reminds you how passionate, clever and funny he still is about the issues he cares about. The great part about the show is the focus on the issues puts the show closer to Last Week rather than the Daily Show, so there's no celebrity fluff or promotion.

Can't wait for more!

Jon Stewart's brief excursion into Apple before returning to the Daily Show was eagerly anticipated but never really found its feet. He did seem a bit stiff during the intro segments throughout but I admire the analytical format generally - even if the central panel discussions did tend towards the superfluous at best and downright awkward at worst. Where he really shone was interviewing the heavy hitters - his stunning wrong-footing of the Shell CEO in the first season was one of the highlights of the year for me and may be revisited in future times. Ultimately "Problem" lacked consistency and for me sits in the shadow of the far superior (and sadly cancelled) "Problem Areas With Wyatt Cenac". More to that, at the end (or mid point) of the slightly leaner second season, he ditched the long-form analysis model and briefly re-entered contemporary critique again and the vibe was palpable. That he then returned to his ideal format and excelled in the pre-election time makes this now a bit of a forgotten curio rather than anything worth seeking out particularly but there were some really bright spots.