AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,6/10
1,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.A family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.A family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 4 indicações no total
Michael Raymond-James
- Lone Wolf
- (as Michael Raymond James)
Charline St. Charles
- Francine
- (as Charline St Charles)
Avaliações em destaque
As I was watching this film, it wasn't long into it, that I start noticing the stupidity of the characters. I suppose that in itself is entertaining, but usually it's more frustrating and maddening. This film definitely doesn't lead you into laughing about the ridiculousness of stupidity either.
I asked myself WHY I continued to watch this movie....clear up to the last 15 minutes. And that is when it became clear.
Then the ending left me with different questions.
I like that!!
I bet many people will not understand or like this movie. I'm not sure I understand it....
All I can say is I liked it. It made me think and feel.
I asked myself WHY I continued to watch this movie....clear up to the last 15 minutes. And that is when it became clear.
Then the ending left me with different questions.
I like that!!
I bet many people will not understand or like this movie. I'm not sure I understand it....
All I can say is I liked it. It made me think and feel.
This movie is great. It's such a cozy little movie to sit down and watch if you feel like watching something experimental. Pros, the main character is very fun to watch run around the woods. Cons, some of the shots drag on FAR too long. This movie sucked me in at the end, but you have to make it through the long, long beginning to get to the interesting parts. Joseph is a typical "Average Joe" character, but it fits the movie and his actor does an amazing job at portraying him. I won't spoil the plot twist here, but it caught me off guard and make the experience a loooot more interesting. The ending was beautifully shot, and I wasn't disappointed with spending my time watching this movie.
Joseph Chambers sells insurance for a living and he apparently makes a good living doing so. He is seen at the start of the story dressing up for a solo hunting adventure, much to the displeasure of his wife. Against her wise advice, the city slicker borrows a deer rifle from a friend for his first expedition.
His trek eventually turns out badly and the second half of the movie has Joseph making a few important decisions.
His future is dependent upon what moral choices he will ultimately make. Clayne Crawford is on screen alone for most of the film and he is excellent as Joseph Chambers. Will he or won't he do what is right?
His trek eventually turns out badly and the second half of the movie has Joseph making a few important decisions.
His future is dependent upon what moral choices he will ultimately make. Clayne Crawford is on screen alone for most of the film and he is excellent as Joseph Chambers. Will he or won't he do what is right?
I am rarely this negative on a movie, but the fact that all those reviews that gave this a great rating got me suckered into wasting my time watching this...? Don't be fooled like I was!
This movie simply is not working h the time it takes to watch. It is one of the SLOWEST moving movies that I have ever seen! And it's not like a "Good" slow, either. You know, the kinda that actually rewards your anticipation with a great scene. Nope. This movie is literally filled with scenes that drag on, and on, and on, and on... and the fact that there is hardly ANY dialogue going on in this movie only makes these scenes MORE brutal! It truly feels like the film maker was just trying to fill in a bunch of "dead time" to make this movie as long as it is. Because honestly, this story could have been told 20-30 minutes.
What an utter waste of time. Don't bother!
This movie simply is not working h the time it takes to watch. It is one of the SLOWEST moving movies that I have ever seen! And it's not like a "Good" slow, either. You know, the kinda that actually rewards your anticipation with a great scene. Nope. This movie is literally filled with scenes that drag on, and on, and on, and on... and the fact that there is hardly ANY dialogue going on in this movie only makes these scenes MORE brutal! It truly feels like the film maker was just trying to fill in a bunch of "dead time" to make this movie as long as it is. Because honestly, this story could have been told 20-30 minutes.
What an utter waste of time. Don't bother!
I get the point of this movie, it's not bad in that sense, as it has one.
Overall it looks quite realistic and you can relate to the characters, they are believable.
There are some quite lengthy parts in this movie that seemingly do nothing.
And the biggest problem is the abrupt ending with no good conclusion other than the obvious.
So what I'd like to say is that you can have all those lengthy parts in the movie, where the character is explored and developed and etc, even if nothing much happens, but it is only reasonable and justifiable if you then have an ending where the character and the whole story blooms and all of this previous stalling now gets a meaning. But there was no such thing in this one.
So there is clearly no reason to stretch this story to 90 minutes. This whole movie could've been 15 minutes long and conceptually it would lose absolutely nothing.
Overall it looks quite realistic and you can relate to the characters, they are believable.
There are some quite lengthy parts in this movie that seemingly do nothing.
And the biggest problem is the abrupt ending with no good conclusion other than the obvious.
So what I'd like to say is that you can have all those lengthy parts in the movie, where the character is explored and developed and etc, even if nothing much happens, but it is only reasonable and justifiable if you then have an ending where the character and the whole story blooms and all of this previous stalling now gets a meaning. But there was no such thing in this one.
So there is clearly no reason to stretch this story to 90 minutes. This whole movie could've been 15 minutes long and conceptually it would lose absolutely nothing.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesClayne Crawford and Jordana Brewster previously worked together on the tv series Lethal Weapon (2016)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Integrity of Joseph Chambers?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Integrity of Joseph Chambers
- Locações de filme
- Clay, Alabama, EUA(Wooded area)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 5.206
- Tempo de duração1 hora 36 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was A Integridade de Joseph Chambers (2022) officially released in India in English?
Responda