Um cientista brilhante, mas egocêntrico, dá vida a uma criatura em um experimento monstruoso que acaba levando à destruição do criador e de sua trágica criação.Um cientista brilhante, mas egocêntrico, dá vida a uma criatura em um experimento monstruoso que acaba levando à destruição do criador e de sua trágica criação.Um cientista brilhante, mas egocêntrico, dá vida a uma criatura em um experimento monstruoso que acaba levando à destruição do criador e de sua trágica criação.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Estrelas
- Prêmios
- 29 vitórias e 151 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Resumo
Avaliações em destaque
The visuals are phenomenal, the acting is outstanding all around (although Isaac and Elordi are the standouts), Guillermo's writing and direction are steadfast and intimately visceral, the music is haunting, and the cinematography is some of the best of the year. I will be seeing this again in theaters, but I hope Netflix sits down and let's this epic go to IMAX. That would be one hell of an experience.
The performances are strong across the board. Oscar Isaac offers a convincing, if occasionally a little over-the-top, portrayal of Frankenstein. However, he is ultimately outshined by Jacob Elordi as the Creature. It's a challenging role that could have easily been one-dimensional, but Elordi imbues it with remarkable depth, emotion, and soul - a truly fantastic performance. Christoph Waltz delivers a familiar turn, very much in line with his recent work, while Mia Goth is solid, though it remains to be seen whether she truly lives up to her "next big thing" reputation.
On a technical level, the film excels. The cinematography is stunning, the set design meticulous, and the score beautifully complements the film's emotional tone. The makeup work is exceptional, and while the costumes are impressive, they occasionally verge on being a bit too extravagant.
If there's one major flaw, it's the runtime - the film could easily have been trimmed by at least thirty minutes. Nevertheless, this is a deeply emotional and visually striking experience, and another remarkable addition to Guillermo Del Toro's already distinguished filmography.
I've loved Guillermo Del Toro since I was a teenager and I watched Pan's Labyrinth for the first time, and then I made it my goal to see everything he's ever directed. But I've loved Mary Shelley's Frankenstein since I was in elementary school. After I read it the first time, I kept rereading it over and over again.
My issue with this is that this is not Frankenstein. At least, not Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The story is completely changed, and I'm not sure that it is for the better. I was seeing all these reviewers rage how this is the Frankenstein we deserve and that this is as close as it gets to the actual book. The former is up for debate, but the latter is a straight up lie from someone who's obviously never read or understood the source material.
If this would've been an original story, I would've liked it way more. But seeing as it is supposed to be an adaptation of a childhood favorite of mine, it simply doesn't hold up. Definitely the biggest disappointment of the year for me, and I've been looking forward to this since last year. I was disappointed when I heard that it wasn't playing in theaters near me, but I guess it was for the best.
If you're going to watch this, I would suggest you drop all expectations of it being Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and watch it as it's own original thing.
Del Toro doesn't fail, but I think he misses the mark at those moments where he changes the story, revising the characters' awareness and motivations. Walz's Harlander is invented and unnecessary, Isaac's Frankenstein is frenzied rather than haunted. It is Jacob Elordi's monster / creature that redeems the film, in addition to its beautiful gothic style and fine pacing (the runtime is long, but suitable). Overall, a great addition to the lore and worth seeing on the big screen.
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #7 Frankenstein
Frankenstein Through the Years
Frankenstein Through the Years
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesVictor Frankenstein's laboratory and Captain Anderson's ship were fully constructed sets. "I want real sets", director Guillermo del Toro explains. "I don't want digital, I don't want AI, I don't want simulation. I want old-fashioned craftsmanship: people painting, building, hammering, plastering."
- Erros de gravaçãoIn 1857, Victor Frankenstein buys dynamite to blow up the Creature. Alfred Nobel did not invent dynamite until 1866, 9 years after the movie was set.
- Citações
The Creature: An idea, a feeling became clear to me. The hunter did not hate the wolf. The wolf did not hate the sheep. But violence felt inevitable between them. Perhaps, I thought, this was the way of the world. It would hunt you and kill you just for being who you are.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe Netflix logo is formed by two batteries running an electric charge in Victor Frankenstein's laboratory.
- ConexõesFeatured in Horror's Greatest: Film Scores (2025)
- Trilhas sonorasRondeau (Abedelazer)
Written by Henry Purcell
Arranged by Jonathan Scott
Performed by Jonathan Scott
courtesy of: Scott Brothers Duo
Principais escolhas
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
- How long is Frankenstein?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Dr. Frankenstein
- Locações de filme
- North Bay, Nipissing, Ontário, Canadá(Location / exteriors - Arctic)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 120.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 144.496
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 29 min(149 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1






