Chandramukhi 2: A Vingança

The Former was a cult classic which literally had a very strong screenplay due to its Original versions from Other language. But This is better be called as a Spoof or remake's remake. Definitely It is not a Sequel. Raghava Lawrence gave his part as vettaiyan which looks so pathetic and Kangana Ranaut couldn't even match with the former performances of other legends. The Unofficial Sequel Nagavalli was even better compared to this. Dir P. Vasu insulted the whole fanbase of chandramukhi. Superstar Rajinikanth chose Enthiran over this which the best thing that happened in his life. Extremely Bad.

While Chandramukhi 1 boasted a meticulously crafted screenplay brimming with entertainment, mystery, and thrills, its sequel, Chandramukhi 2, unfortunately falls short in comparison. In the second installment, the narrative treads a familiar path, rendering everything rather predictable. It fails to deliver the captivating entertainment and spine-tingling thrills that its predecessor offered, often veering towards boredom. The climax, in particular, drags on endlessly, testing the patience of the audience.

Lead actor Lawrence's exaggerated performance proves to be a significant irritant, feeling entirely out of place for the character he portrays. The first half of the film lacks the spark of excitement, only coming to life when the flashback episode unfolds in the second half. On a positive note, Kangana's presence graces the screen with her beauty, and her acting and dance sequences, while decent, lack the impact one would hope for. Some might argue that she doesn't quite fit the character as envisioned.

On the technical front, the cinematography and set design shine, showcasing the visual prowess of the production team. Unfortunately, the songs fail to leave a mark. Moreover, the direction adheres to an outdated style that doesn't align with contemporary storytelling trends.

In conclusion, I cannot recommend watching Chandramukhi 2, either in theaters or on OTT platforms.

Kangana is no doubtedly on of the few best actresses we have right now. Why is Indian cinema wasting her on such craps and non actresses like Taapsee get to work with Rajkumar Hirani and SRK?? The movie was one of the stupidest I've watched and I'm sorry that she is wasted on this. I only watched it for her, ended up with a headache. She was great but the rest of the cast, the story, direction, writing etc. Was crap. Just crap. Watch it if you're a die hard Kangana fans, her appearance is pleasant, though for a very short time, but you have to tolerate the rest of the stupidity and below average cast for it or like me fast forward to her part.

To start with, the movie is excessively loud. I went to watch the movie for the pure nostalgia, but you are betrayed by poor writing, poor screenplay, and all round poor acting. The movie plays like a mega serial right from the start. If you were expecting Vadivelu to recreate the magic from Chandramukhi 1, you will be wrong! Nobody can save this movie.

The graphics are horrible. The CGI is cringe work. The dog fight sequence is among the worst.

If you thought Keeravani' s background score and music would be worth the watch, you are once again wrong!

Finally, the direction! You would not have expected P. Vasu to have directed this movie.

Considered as the one of the worst film in Tamil. Is this a sequel? I was bored to complete this film. It took 2 days to finish this film. I was like watching serial. Just wished to finish the film. Such a boring film. This movie destroys the first film. And Vadivelu' s comedy become more worse in this film. I couldn't believe it is the same director who directed the first part. And mainly the VFX, they've used kinemaster for VFX I think. Looks like low poly rendering. I wondered how this film was failure. And main thing, the acting. They were acting like low paid. SLEEPING PILLS. Highly not recommended.