Enys Men
- 2022
- 1 h 36 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,6/10
4,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Em uma ilha desabitada na costa britânica, uma voluntária da vida selvagem inicia uma jornada metafísica e ecosófica aterrorizante que desafia sua percepção da realidade e a empurra para um ... Ler tudoEm uma ilha desabitada na costa britânica, uma voluntária da vida selvagem inicia uma jornada metafísica e ecosófica aterrorizante que desafia sua percepção da realidade e a empurra para um pesadelo vivo.Em uma ilha desabitada na costa britânica, uma voluntária da vida selvagem inicia uma jornada metafísica e ecosófica aterrorizante que desafia sua percepção da realidade e a empurra para um pesadelo vivo.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias e 9 indicações no total
Morgan Val Baker
- The Boatman
- (não creditado)
Amanda Rawling
- Bal Maiden
- (não creditado)
Dion Star
- The Boatman
- (não creditado)
Isaac Woodvine
- The Boatman
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
This is an almost entirely single-handed, dialogue free, story of a woman who is taking (very basic) climate and wildlife data on an otherwise uninhabited island off the Cornish Coast. Clearly this has been a mining island in days gone by, with ruins and mine-workings strewn around the place and those exude a sort of creepiness that is only augmented by the constant wind and the sound of the waves crashing against the rocks. Her days are routine, to say the least, but gradually we start to realise that the island has been touched by tragedy - as has the woman (Mary Woodvine) herself. Auteur Mark Jenkin doesn't rush with this, but rather takes his time to slowly but surely allow us to put together some of the pieces of just what drew this woman to this isolated and lonely spot. It's that repetitive pacelessness that I struggled with. We see the same shots over and over again, the same procedures and scenarios and though there is a very incremental development of the plot, the whole thing just doesn't really move. It has the hallmarks of an original "Poldark" episode married with the "Dr. Who - Stones of Blood" series from 1978. To be fair, it has a very authentic 1973 feel to it, and the audio mixing coupled with some sparingly used visual effects do help create a very slight air of mystery and tragedy, but I found it all just a bit lacking. Worth a watch though, but I'm not sure I will watch it again.
This is mostly a response to these depressing reviews. Have you never watched a moody film before?
You should already know from Bait that Jenkin is an experimental filmmaker. It's an unconventional film which is about experiencing a mood and atmosphere. The film won't spoon feed you the same storytelling tropes you've already seen a million times before, so if that makes a film "bad" to you then stay away. Don't try to understand it, just watch it.
I much preferred this to Bait. I liked the sound design, the blurring of nightmare and reality and the body horror elements.
What's he got against lichen, though?
You should already know from Bait that Jenkin is an experimental filmmaker. It's an unconventional film which is about experiencing a mood and atmosphere. The film won't spoon feed you the same storytelling tropes you've already seen a million times before, so if that makes a film "bad" to you then stay away. Don't try to understand it, just watch it.
I much preferred this to Bait. I liked the sound design, the blurring of nightmare and reality and the body horror elements.
What's he got against lichen, though?
Seems most people either love it or dislike/hate it... I liked it but probably won't watch it again anytime soon. I don't have a clue about the regional legends, folktales or cultural markers the movie is said to reference.
What I do have is a lot of patience and quite a bit of imagination. It also helped that it was screened at a folk horror event so I had some context for it. Thus the film did keep my interest as I tried to piece together WTH was going on, and creating a story within my head as the movie went on. The atmosphere is eerie and the movie overall is experimentally interesting so I think the director is on to something, I'd just hope his next effort would be something where I don't have to create most of the story for myself.
Go see if you're ok with experimental, slow-paced stuff that doesn't offer you much answers.
Avoid if you want your horror with action and explanations, and have a low threshold for experimental stuff.
What I do have is a lot of patience and quite a bit of imagination. It also helped that it was screened at a folk horror event so I had some context for it. Thus the film did keep my interest as I tried to piece together WTH was going on, and creating a story within my head as the movie went on. The atmosphere is eerie and the movie overall is experimentally interesting so I think the director is on to something, I'd just hope his next effort would be something where I don't have to create most of the story for myself.
Go see if you're ok with experimental, slow-paced stuff that doesn't offer you much answers.
Avoid if you want your horror with action and explanations, and have a low threshold for experimental stuff.
On an island there's a woman you will find, she has strange habits and she's losing most her mind, strange flowers keep her busy, cascading stones may make you dizzy, into a void that one assumes, was sometimes mined. She has a scar across her midriff from a cut, it went quite deep and nearly opened up her gut, along the mark she's growing lichen, perhaps she's rather over ripened, on the horizon, a strange rock protrudes and juts. On occasion she receives a man in boat, we find out later that he's buoyant and can float, although he clearly cannot swim, or make the most of his four limbs, as he's puffed up showing signs of a great bloat.
Imaginative stuff, but a little too abstract.
Imaginative stuff, but a little too abstract.
An infuriatingly dull and frustrating watch which seems to hint at lots of interesting ideas that don't develop in any way. I loved bait and while this uses a similar aesthetic it lacks anything approaching a story, character development or depth. It's also mind numbingly repetitive.
I see other reviews saying that people might not "get" what this film is really about or saying. If that's the case then gods sake please enlighten us on what there is to understand rather than smugly pontificating. I feel like in reality it's not a lot. And if it requires some prior understanding of 'Cornish culture' to understand what's going on then sorry, I don't realise I had to revise before I watched it.
I see other reviews saying that people might not "get" what this film is really about or saying. If that's the case then gods sake please enlighten us on what there is to understand rather than smugly pontificating. I feel like in reality it's not a lot. And if it requires some prior understanding of 'Cornish culture' to understand what's going on then sorry, I don't realise I had to revise before I watched it.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesA hand double was used to write in the log book throughout the film. Mary Woodvine claimed her writing was deemed 'not up to scratch' at a Q&A in London.
- Citações
The Preacher: And now descends the Night of Sin!
- ConexõesFeatured in Horrible Reviews: The Horrors Of 2023: Enys Men | Video review (2023)
- Trilhas sonorasKan Me
Written and Performed by Gwenno
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Enys Men?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Кам'яний острів
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 189.579
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 74.781
- 2 de abr. de 2023
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 583.364
- Tempo de duração1 hora 36 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.33 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente