Showtrial
- Série de TV
- 2021–2024
- 1 h
Um caso de assassinato de alto perfil lança Cleo Roberts, um advogado que já defendeu o principal suspeito, de volta aos holofotes.Um caso de assassinato de alto perfil lança Cleo Roberts, um advogado que já defendeu o principal suspeito, de volta aos holofotes.Um caso de assassinato de alto perfil lança Cleo Roberts, um advogado que já defendeu o principal suspeito, de volta aos holofotes.
- Indicado para 1 prêmio BAFTA
- 5 indicações no total
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Another British crime drama - as we know, these sorts of shows are a dime a dozen across U. K television, from the good, the bad to the ugly. For me, this was definitely in the 'good' bracket and sits on the higher end in terms of quality - it had me invested and engaged throughout.
To garner my attention, there has to be good characters, good writing, good shots and eye-catching scenery - this show ticked all the boxes. The main character (one of the accused) played by Celine Buckens was absolutely fascinating in her role - portraying the full spectrum of traits from nasty, to annoying, to funny, to vulnerable, to frail. She definitely takes you on a journey as a viewer. The main lawyer, played by Tracy Ifeachor, was also good in her role too and was very convincing.
As this is a BBC production that was made in 2021, I was expecting to have lots of political cringe moments thrown in but this show is 'mostly' free of them - I say mostly, as there are tiny bits now and again but it's marginal and definitely not overbearing. The other thing I liked, which I was quite surprised about, is that there wasn't a romantic subplot. Time and time again, most shows, of all genres, seem to 'have to' include the cheesy love plot angle amongst the drama for balance - not in this show. Very refreshing to see a crime drama that is brave enough to just stick to the topic at hand, which was the crime and case, without having to veer off into other directions.
My only criticism is that maybe some of what happens could be deemed a bit far fetched, in terms of the way a case is built and run - some of the court scenes seemed a bit dramatised for effect but it didn't bother me at all. This was entertainment and I wasn't looking to pick it apart in that manner (although I'm sure others might).
The ending for me was satisfactory, with the result I wanted and I had no regrets about investing the time to get there - which is why this gets a high (and generous) score of an 8/10 from me.
To garner my attention, there has to be good characters, good writing, good shots and eye-catching scenery - this show ticked all the boxes. The main character (one of the accused) played by Celine Buckens was absolutely fascinating in her role - portraying the full spectrum of traits from nasty, to annoying, to funny, to vulnerable, to frail. She definitely takes you on a journey as a viewer. The main lawyer, played by Tracy Ifeachor, was also good in her role too and was very convincing.
As this is a BBC production that was made in 2021, I was expecting to have lots of political cringe moments thrown in but this show is 'mostly' free of them - I say mostly, as there are tiny bits now and again but it's marginal and definitely not overbearing. The other thing I liked, which I was quite surprised about, is that there wasn't a romantic subplot. Time and time again, most shows, of all genres, seem to 'have to' include the cheesy love plot angle amongst the drama for balance - not in this show. Very refreshing to see a crime drama that is brave enough to just stick to the topic at hand, which was the crime and case, without having to veer off into other directions.
My only criticism is that maybe some of what happens could be deemed a bit far fetched, in terms of the way a case is built and run - some of the court scenes seemed a bit dramatised for effect but it didn't bother me at all. This was entertainment and I wasn't looking to pick it apart in that manner (although I'm sure others might).
The ending for me was satisfactory, with the result I wanted and I had no regrets about investing the time to get there - which is why this gets a high (and generous) score of an 8/10 from me.
As other reviewers have mentioned, the acting and plot are at a high standard, making for a believable and gripping drama series. There are interesting side stories, often red herrings to the main plot - but you don't know that at the time. My only reservation is that this being a BBC drama, it wasn't too hard to guess the trajectory of the case and who the culprits might be. The Beebs 'usual suspects'. That slightly devalued the twists and turns in the plot for me.
Very well made and superbly acted. Held my attention from start to finish. OK the story sometimes seemed a bit too complex and lacking credibility but I was easily able to suspend disbelief. All the lead characters were on top form, and the flash backs were handled well. I felt that five episodes was just about right.
Recommended viewing.
Recommended viewing.
It seems that almost every high-profile crime-drama from the BBC has to feature the tag-line "from the makers of 'Line Of Duty'" as if to guarantee by association the quality of the new series, which given the recent falling-off in quality of the corporation's major cash-cow, starts to have a somewhat dubious ring to it.
I'm happy to say though that this time, this five-parter did live up far more to the hype. Tense, exciting and intriguing, it kept my wife and I pretty much on tenterhooks throughout as we followed literally the trials and tribulations of the two young rich and privileged, to coin a phrase 24 hour party people accused of murdering a fellow college student after attending a party where they both get out-of-their-faces on drink and drugs and where the victim, from a completely different, lower social-class is coincidentally present acting as a waitress. Both the accused have lofty connections, one the deep, introverted, doe-eyed, lap-dog son of a female government minister and the other the reckless, insolent, pouting wild-child daughter of a prominent business entrepreneur. The young girl who is murdered, by contrast, is the daughter of her workaday, single-parent mum.
Culminating in a gripping courtroom trial, the title of the piece informs us that this is as much about trial-by-media in the modern-age as it is about natural justice and heaven knows there have been enough cases involving high-profile personalities and their offspring going back all the way to the children of Hollywood stars like Lana Turner and Marlon Brando, inevitably taking in the likes of O. J. and Amanda Knox along the way, up to the present day.
As is usual in double-trials of this type, the jury is asked to consider whether none, one or both the accused parties are guilty and we frequently see the legal team of the one trying to pass the blame onto the other, making it difficult for jurors to apportion blame in a tactic which at its most successful obtains a double-acquittal. Although both the accused naturally have access to high-powered, cost-no-object legal teams, it's fair to say the programme concentrates far more on the charismatic young girl Talitha, played by Celine Buckens than on Joseph Payne's doleful character Dhillon Harwood. Perhaps this skewered viewpoint upsets somewhat the balance of the piece, but there's no question that Buckens grabs the spotlight with both hands with an edgy, dynamic, seductive performance which immediately draws the viewer in. Unlike Paine's meek character, you never doubt for an instant that of the two she would be the one more capable of committing the crime but that of course doesn't mean she actually did it.
Her rich if distant daddy wants to employ his own-choice well-practiced legal team but instead is won over by the diligence and integrity of the initial appointee circuit solicitor, played by Tracey Ifeachor. She's rather unnecessarily given a back story which shows her having once been a high-flier herself in court circles as well as having a past romantic liaison with one of the police detectives determined to nail both the youngsters for the crime. As the plot unwinds in flashback, it involves identifiable modern themes of trial-by-media, students, especially females, resorting to sex-work to supplement their life-styles, stalking, drink and drug excess if not abuse as well as the more traditional ones showcasing the difference attitudes between rich and poor, old and young and even parent and child.
I was satisfied by the relatively clear-cut ending after the engrossing murder trial had played out. There was no Morse-like surprise ending with a convoluted out-of-left-field explanation of events. A young girl loses her life, the only two people who could have committed the crime are on trial and clearly one or both of them is responsible and no matter what we the viewer may think of the outcome, justice is seen to be done even as we appreciate that only the two in the dock know the truth about what really happened the night the young girl was killed. There's a cheeky postscript which plays with the audience's expectations and threatens to pull it all back down into cliché but which skirts the issue impishly, skilfully and convincingly, all in the wink of an eye.
Miss Buckens, I have to say, was electric as the "It Girl" whose world is turned upside down but Payne is almost as good as her doting co-accused, while Ifeachor as Talitha's steely solicitor and James Frain as the girl's high-powered but ultimately powerless dad deliver high quality performances in support.
Altogether, a very satisfying, credible and satisfying production, far better than the most recent series of its much vaunted progenitor.
I'm happy to say though that this time, this five-parter did live up far more to the hype. Tense, exciting and intriguing, it kept my wife and I pretty much on tenterhooks throughout as we followed literally the trials and tribulations of the two young rich and privileged, to coin a phrase 24 hour party people accused of murdering a fellow college student after attending a party where they both get out-of-their-faces on drink and drugs and where the victim, from a completely different, lower social-class is coincidentally present acting as a waitress. Both the accused have lofty connections, one the deep, introverted, doe-eyed, lap-dog son of a female government minister and the other the reckless, insolent, pouting wild-child daughter of a prominent business entrepreneur. The young girl who is murdered, by contrast, is the daughter of her workaday, single-parent mum.
Culminating in a gripping courtroom trial, the title of the piece informs us that this is as much about trial-by-media in the modern-age as it is about natural justice and heaven knows there have been enough cases involving high-profile personalities and their offspring going back all the way to the children of Hollywood stars like Lana Turner and Marlon Brando, inevitably taking in the likes of O. J. and Amanda Knox along the way, up to the present day.
As is usual in double-trials of this type, the jury is asked to consider whether none, one or both the accused parties are guilty and we frequently see the legal team of the one trying to pass the blame onto the other, making it difficult for jurors to apportion blame in a tactic which at its most successful obtains a double-acquittal. Although both the accused naturally have access to high-powered, cost-no-object legal teams, it's fair to say the programme concentrates far more on the charismatic young girl Talitha, played by Celine Buckens than on Joseph Payne's doleful character Dhillon Harwood. Perhaps this skewered viewpoint upsets somewhat the balance of the piece, but there's no question that Buckens grabs the spotlight with both hands with an edgy, dynamic, seductive performance which immediately draws the viewer in. Unlike Paine's meek character, you never doubt for an instant that of the two she would be the one more capable of committing the crime but that of course doesn't mean she actually did it.
Her rich if distant daddy wants to employ his own-choice well-practiced legal team but instead is won over by the diligence and integrity of the initial appointee circuit solicitor, played by Tracey Ifeachor. She's rather unnecessarily given a back story which shows her having once been a high-flier herself in court circles as well as having a past romantic liaison with one of the police detectives determined to nail both the youngsters for the crime. As the plot unwinds in flashback, it involves identifiable modern themes of trial-by-media, students, especially females, resorting to sex-work to supplement their life-styles, stalking, drink and drug excess if not abuse as well as the more traditional ones showcasing the difference attitudes between rich and poor, old and young and even parent and child.
I was satisfied by the relatively clear-cut ending after the engrossing murder trial had played out. There was no Morse-like surprise ending with a convoluted out-of-left-field explanation of events. A young girl loses her life, the only two people who could have committed the crime are on trial and clearly one or both of them is responsible and no matter what we the viewer may think of the outcome, justice is seen to be done even as we appreciate that only the two in the dock know the truth about what really happened the night the young girl was killed. There's a cheeky postscript which plays with the audience's expectations and threatens to pull it all back down into cliché but which skirts the issue impishly, skilfully and convincingly, all in the wink of an eye.
Miss Buckens, I have to say, was electric as the "It Girl" whose world is turned upside down but Payne is almost as good as her doting co-accused, while Ifeachor as Talitha's steely solicitor and James Frain as the girl's high-powered but ultimately powerless dad deliver high quality performances in support.
Altogether, a very satisfying, credible and satisfying production, far better than the most recent series of its much vaunted progenitor.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe number of Crown Prosecution Lawyers in the UK is approx one fifth of the number of Barristers and one twentieth the number of practising lawyers - they therefore have a high case load and less time than shown in the series to focus on individual cases, accepting of course that high profile ShowTrials would merit more involvement.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Showtrial have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Showtrial, ¿víctima o monstruo?
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente