Bullet Proof

This film makes absolutely no sense, the script was rubbish, the direction was rubbish and the actors (Vinny Jones aside) were rubbish. I don't get how other people have rated this higher than a 3, let alone the 10s that fooled me into watching this tripe.

I will forever avoid films 'directed' by James Clayton from here on. He's definitely 'one to watch' in the future alright....but not in a good way.

There's a radio button that appears while I write this review which asks if what I'm writing contains spoilers...I'm afraid it does, "This film is T-E-R-R-I-B-L-E". Sorry, but unless you're related to anyone producing this film, I can't see why anyone would want to watch this. This really is up there with one of the worst films I've ever seen....and I've watched a load of turkeys.

Story - 0.50 :: Direction - 1.00 :: Pacing - 1.25 :: Performances - 1.00 :: Entertainment - 1.25 TOTAL - 5/10

Not every film needs to stimulate the mind. Some merely need to deliver car chases, gunfire, and Vinnie Jones doing his best impression of a man who has just been cut off at the bar. This is that film.

The plot is action-movie paint-by-numbers: an unnamed anti-hero steals from a deranged crime boss, unknowingly picks up said boss's pregnant wife, and suddenly finds himself pursued by a madman with no moral compass and a deep personal investment in retrieving his family and fortune. Cue the requisite chaos, violence, and a shadowy hitman named "The Frenchman" because, of course, there is.

The writing, courtesy of Cooper Bibaud, Danny Mac, and James Clayton, is nothing if not predictable. The characters are stock action figures: the reluctant hero, the unhinged villain, the enigmatic assassin. Originality is nowhere to be found, but at least James Clayton's direction injects some energy into the proceedings. His use of tempo shifts and creative camera angles make the relentless action more engaging than it has any right to be.

As for performances, Vinnie Jones reigns supreme, which is another way of saying that the acting is functional at best. He glares, he growls, he explodes into violence; he is every Vinnie Jones character ever, and honestly, that is half the fun. The rest of the cast do their best with what they are given, but with characters this thinly drawn, their efforts can only go so far.

Is it good? Not really. Is it entertaining? Absolutely. This is cinematic junk food: it will not nourish the mind, but it will satisfy that craving for mindless mayhem.

I started watching this film without too many expectations, but somehow I watched the film with interest to the end wothout rewind. The story is not exactly the most unique, it reminds me of many works I have seen, but I say that it also retains a certain amount of its own originality. The plot moves too fast so many things suffer because of it, too fast plotting is never good. This is a below average action movie that is watchable but nothing more, it doesn't leave any special impression.

It's the same old same old with added shmutz and a piss poor story that has been told numerous times afore. Embarrassing and amateur for the most part.

People need a reminder that not all movies have to have insane budgets or be award worthy or deep for them to be entertaining. This was a fun action film! It was really fast paced, it made time go by really quickly. I was impressed with it for what it was. Action sequences were cool! The Frenchman is not your typical hitman, more soft spoken, but it kind of worked. There's some great humor that I wasn't expecting, and yeah it hits a lot of action movie tropes, but that seems like it was on purpose, so I liked it. Reminded me of 90s action films. Vinnie Jones isn't the greatest actor, but that's okay, he fits the bad guy thing well, there's a reason he's typecast often and it worked well in this. The new actors that play Mia and The Thief were both pretty good and had some great and sometimes funny chemistry. 7/10.