Uma adaptação horrorizada do popular programa de TV dos anos 70 sobre um resort na ilha mágica.Uma adaptação horrorizada do popular programa de TV dos anos 70 sobre um resort na ilha mágica.Uma adaptação horrorizada do popular programa de TV dos anos 70 sobre um resort na ilha mágica.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 5 indicações no total
Avaliações em destaque
Never saw the original show but this was a nightmare of a film and I mean that in a bad way. A bit like KNIVES OUT in terms of set-up but then turning into a turgid mess with a lot of mystery, some random action scenes, and a lot of tiresome fantasy stuff. I didn't like the characters, didn't buy their motivations, and found the whole thing increasingly silly as it went on, a bit like LOST for the 2020s. The only good part was Michael Rooker's action man role.
You know Oscar season is well and truly over when a film like Fantasy Island is dropped into cinemas, ready to remind audiences that too much of a good thing is a bad thing. No, I'm not talking about the fantasies turned nightmares at the centre of the film, but rather the need for films like Fantasy Island to remind audiences what constitutes a good film to begin with.
At the top of that list should be a coherent storyline, something which Fantasy Island didn't seem able to budget into its meagre $7 million price-tag. What begins as a fun B-grade horror/thriller quickly descends into abject nonsense, with a last act that will either have you howling in laughter or utter disbelief... or both. It's like the studio decided to take the supernatural elements from Lost, but forgot to bring the nuance, depth or philosophical pretence that made that show (mostly) work. Or they just hired the guys who wrote Truth or Dare.
Full disclosure, I have never seen an episode of the same-titled 70's show upon which the film is based on. Maybe those who find the show a guilty pleasure will be more forgiving of the film's utter nonsense. But, if there's one thing they are less likely to forgive is the film's treatment of an iconic character. Contrary to reports, "Tattoo" is in the film, but after watching it you'd probably prefer he wasn't.
At the top of that list should be a coherent storyline, something which Fantasy Island didn't seem able to budget into its meagre $7 million price-tag. What begins as a fun B-grade horror/thriller quickly descends into abject nonsense, with a last act that will either have you howling in laughter or utter disbelief... or both. It's like the studio decided to take the supernatural elements from Lost, but forgot to bring the nuance, depth or philosophical pretence that made that show (mostly) work. Or they just hired the guys who wrote Truth or Dare.
Full disclosure, I have never seen an episode of the same-titled 70's show upon which the film is based on. Maybe those who find the show a guilty pleasure will be more forgiving of the film's utter nonsense. But, if there's one thing they are less likely to forgive is the film's treatment of an iconic character. Contrary to reports, "Tattoo" is in the film, but after watching it you'd probably prefer he wasn't.
Why is it we keep having these tired and convoluted attempts to recreate great movies and series from yesteryear instead of creative and original attempts at something new; its very sad if this is the state of affairs and there are no writers left or directors who can make something great when there are so many possibilities in comics like 2000AD or Tornado or Starlord from the 80's if they cannot come up with original writers and forsake truly modern and creative directors like Neill Blomkamp directing shorts and commercials.
How was it possible in the 60,70,80's and even 90's we had original movies with good stories and direction from greats like Carpenter, Ridley and we end up with turgid efforts like this, it is very sad for the movie industry if this is what we are left with, very sad indeed.
The original was a classic and nobody could replace Ricardo Montalban or even Tattoo so why try?
Pointless remake with such a deeply contrived storyline that it beggars belief they thought audiences would fall for it. No just NO!
How was it possible in the 60,70,80's and even 90's we had original movies with good stories and direction from greats like Carpenter, Ridley and we end up with turgid efforts like this, it is very sad for the movie industry if this is what we are left with, very sad indeed.
The original was a classic and nobody could replace Ricardo Montalban or even Tattoo so why try?
Pointless remake with such a deeply contrived storyline that it beggars belief they thought audiences would fall for it. No just NO!
Oscar worthy? No. But, if you're in the mood for a nice, fun comedy, action, thriller... it is A-OK. Has a couple of twists. Keeps you wondering where its going. If the plot gets a little sketchy here and there, have some more popcorn and give it a bit!
I enjoyed it more than many higher rated, more pumped movies I've seen lately! Grab ya a bucket, a nice beverage and have a little fun with this one!
I enjoyed it more than many higher rated, more pumped movies I've seen lately! Grab ya a bucket, a nice beverage and have a little fun with this one!
Granted, I was lured in by the promise of the movie's poster, the fact that it was labeled as a horror movie, plus that Michael Peña and Maggie Q was on the cast list.
Little did I know what I was in for actually. Turns out that this movie was a mess of a storyline. The character gallery was for the most part a very flaccid and pointless one, to be bluntly honest. And that gave the actors and actresses very little to work with. And it didn't help that the storyline written by Jillian Jacobs, Christopher Roach and Jeff Wadlow seemed like they were individually told to write something on a concept without talking and sparring together. It was just a mess and a pain to sit through, literally.
Not even the performances of Michael Peña, Maggie Q or Michael Rooker could do much to lift up this train wreck of a movie.
I managed to sit through the movie in its entire length, but I must admit that my attention was failing the things that happened on the screen. The storyline was just way too clumsy and incoherent to catch my attention.
It should be said that some of the visuals in the movie were actually good, but that could only do so much to salvage the rest of the movie.
While I suffered through the entire movie, I can now check it off of my watched movie list and I know for a fact that I will never be returning to watch this 2020 movie again - ever.
My rating of "Fantasy Island" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars. And I put it on three solely because of Michael Peña and Maggie Q, truth be told.
Little did I know what I was in for actually. Turns out that this movie was a mess of a storyline. The character gallery was for the most part a very flaccid and pointless one, to be bluntly honest. And that gave the actors and actresses very little to work with. And it didn't help that the storyline written by Jillian Jacobs, Christopher Roach and Jeff Wadlow seemed like they were individually told to write something on a concept without talking and sparring together. It was just a mess and a pain to sit through, literally.
Not even the performances of Michael Peña, Maggie Q or Michael Rooker could do much to lift up this train wreck of a movie.
I managed to sit through the movie in its entire length, but I must admit that my attention was failing the things that happened on the screen. The storyline was just way too clumsy and incoherent to catch my attention.
It should be said that some of the visuals in the movie were actually good, but that could only do so much to salvage the rest of the movie.
While I suffered through the entire movie, I can now check it off of my watched movie list and I know for a fact that I will never be returning to watch this 2020 movie again - ever.
My rating of "Fantasy Island" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars. And I put it on three solely because of Michael Peña and Maggie Q, truth be told.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWhen Melanie is in the elevator, the music playing is the original 'Fantasy Island' theme song.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen they are taken to the glowing rock, Melanie's fantasy is shown as torturing Sloane when it should have shown her fantasy for revenge.
- Citações
Mr. Roarke: The problem with having it all is that usually someone else wants it too.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosWhen the Columbia Pictures and Blumhouse Productions logos appear, a distorted version of the Ilha da Fantasia (1977) theme music can be heard. The Columbia Pictures and Blumhouse Productions logo plays normally on the home video release.
- Versões alternativasoriginally cut for PG-13 in theaters, an R-rated version was released on home video. It added in all of the cut content, including more bloody violence, and drug use.
- ConexõesFeatured in Chris Stuckmann Movie Reviews: Fantasy Island (2020)
- Trilhas sonorasFantasy Island Theme
Written by Laurence Rosenthal
Courtesy of Sony Pictures Television Inc.
Under license from Sony Pictures Music Group
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Fantasy Island?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- La isla de la fantasía
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 7.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 27.309.289
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 12.310.420
- 16 de fev. de 2020
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 49.447.308
- Tempo de duração1 hora 49 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What was the official certification given to A Ilha da Fantasia (2020) in Japan?
Responda