Salvador

By watching Salvador you can move less than thirty years back and discover or remember, depending on your age, Spain during the latest days of Franco's regime. Those were times where things were changing, but to some others of them it had to take longer.

Salvador Puig Antich will be forever remembered as the last person to be executed in Spain. In the movie, the anarchist Puig Antich is played by the German actor Daniel Brühl. The fact that his mother is Spanish allows him to act speaking in both Spanish and Catalan. Nonetheless, one of the greatest achievements of the film is that it shows how both languages are used in Catalonia. Daniel Brühl's performance is flawless, you could sense his fears, passions,...

The rest of the cast, including Leonardo Sbaraglia or Leonor Watling among many others, adds up quality to the film.

"Salvador" is a great movie. 9 / 10.

I was really caught by the story - a story which I didn't know, and which is hardly known outside Spain and even Catalogne, as the director explained in a festival here in Italy where the film was presented. The last years of life of Salvador Puig Antich, the Spanish anarchic activist, who became the last prisoner of the Franchist regime to be executed. The rhythm is fantastic, energetic and dynamic, thanks to a very suggestive photography and the use of vivid images. The music supports the high tone of the events. The last part involves the spectator in a "crescendo" of emotions, slowing down the rhythm while approaching to the inevitable end. No political claims, no moralistic lessons. A well shot, thrilling, emotional movie!

Historical memory films often tread difficult ground, and Salvador (Puig Antich) does so with uncommon intensity. From the start, Manuel Huerga applies a powerful visual style that gives weight to the story of the Catalan anarchist executed by the Franco regime in 1974. The film doesn't hold back, throwing us directly into his inevitable fate, but before that, it presents Salvador as a human being-one with ideals, flaws, and a life that was taken away without mercy.

Daniel Brühl delivers an exceptional performance, portraying a character who feels alive even in the quietest moments. His evolution throughout the film is brutal, and when the final moments arrive, the anguish he conveys is difficult to shake off. Huerga's direction is another strong point, though the first section, centered on the heists, has a stylized approach reminiscent of Argentine cinema rather than raw realism. Fortunately, once the film shifts focus to the trial and the days leading up to the execution, everything becomes much more visceral, direct, and devastating.

One of the film's greatest achievements is how it avoids empty idealization or forced nostalgia. There are no one-dimensional heroes or villains here-just a story that hurts because it was real and still echoes today. The script masterfully builds tension, making every scene in the final stretch feel like a punch to the gut.

Despite some questionable aesthetic choices in the opening, Salvador is an incredibly powerful film. It doesn't just retell Puig Antich's story-it does so with a sensitivity and precision rarely seen in Spanish cinema. A sharp, unforgiving dose of reality that leaves its mark.

In 1974 the young anarchistic bank-robber Salvador Puig Antich is executed after spending some time in jail. His death starts a period of unrest in Spain, at that time still ruled by the dictator Franco. That unrest is the beginning of democracy in Spain.

This film plays the last months in the life of Salvador. It gives a short insight into his life, his why and what and the choices he makes. It then rolls on to his time in jail and all that follows.

Biographic pictures like this one stand or fall with the capability of the actors to play their real life counterparts convincingly. This film stands. It does a very good job at dramatizing the actual events and left me with a giant lump in my throat.

9 out of 10 accidental heroes.

I don't disagree with the view that the subject is quite appropriate for a movie but displays quite gruesome violence, almost senseless for an artistic product. The scenes leading to the execution of the sentence are particularly distressing are particularly lengthy, the sentence itself is really perturbing for such a kind of movie. Other than that the movie is supposed to accurately reflect the violent times around 1970 in the Western World, and hopefully does achieve that target. Have to admit that, however, good acting and good direction are displayed throughout the movie, the main weakness of the movie can be found in the script only.