[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais popularesFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroMais populares no cinemaHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de cinemaFilmes indianos em destaque
    O que está na TV e no streaming250 séries mais popularesSéries mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias da TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts da IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of So FarDisability Pride MonthPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Nascido hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorSondagens
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Slipstream

  • 2005
  • R
  • 1 h 29 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,5/10
3,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Sean Astin in Slipstream (2005)
ActionSci-FiThriller

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA scientist goes to a bank to meet a pretty bank teller. His time machine allows him to go 10 minutes back in time and correct his approaches to her. He's shadowed by two FBI agents and the ... Ler tudoA scientist goes to a bank to meet a pretty bank teller. His time machine allows him to go 10 minutes back in time and correct his approaches to her. He's shadowed by two FBI agents and the bank gets robbed.A scientist goes to a bank to meet a pretty bank teller. His time machine allows him to go 10 minutes back in time and correct his approaches to her. He's shadowed by two FBI agents and the bank gets robbed.

  • Direção
    • David van Eyssen
  • Roteiristas
    • Louis Morneau
    • Phillip Badger
  • Artistas
    • Sean Astin
    • Vinnie Jones
    • Ivana Milicevic
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    4,5/10
    3,6 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • David van Eyssen
    • Roteiristas
      • Louis Morneau
      • Phillip Badger
    • Artistas
      • Sean Astin
      • Vinnie Jones
      • Ivana Milicevic
    • 87Avaliações de usuários
    • 14Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos5

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal20

    Editar
    Sean Astin
    Sean Astin
    • Stuart
    Vinnie Jones
    Vinnie Jones
    • Briggs
    Ivana Milicevic
    Ivana Milicevic
    • Sarah
    Kevin Otto
    Kevin Otto
    • Jake
    Victoria Bartlett
    • Gillian
    Thorsten Wedekind
    • Cam
    Hakeem Kae-Kazim
    Hakeem Kae-Kazim
    • Runson
    Grant Swanby
    • Tokin
    Verity Price
    • Margaret (Bank Teller)
    Chantal Lambert
    • Sigrid (Bank Manager)
    Patrick Lyster
    Patrick Lyster
    • Hooks
    Andrew Whaley
    • Negotiator
    Sean Higgs
    Sean Higgs
    • Bus Driver
    Tamsin MacCarthy
    Tamsin MacCarthy
    • Air Stewardess
    Eve Szapira
    • Carrie (Young Mother on Airplane)
    Ben Chowney
    • Kevin (Air Marshall)
    Farouk Valley-Omar
    Farouk Valley-Omar
    • Taxi Driver
    • (as Farouk Valley Omar)
    Pierre Malherbe
    • Pilot
    • Direção
      • David van Eyssen
    • Roteiristas
      • Louis Morneau
      • Phillip Badger
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários87

    4,53.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    6heshootshescores

    Even with the quirkiness and errors it was interesting

    The first 10 minutes had me thinking this was one of the worst movies ever produced. As it went on it became more watchable and evolved into a quirky sort of interesting movie. There were some seemingly pointless scenes and some artsy for artsy sake bits, but the plot itself as well as some of the effects were actually pretty decent.

    As for the acting, Sean Astin was as good as Sean Astin gets, take that for what it's worth and the seemingly unknown cast was fair with only a few who were brutal actors.

    Overall, this was an interesting free watch, I might have walked away from a theater scratching my head mind you :-)
    2goanna_38

    Could have been good.

    Just watched this on DVD. Potentially a good idea, spoiled by woeful direction and some of the worst acting I have seen outside of a school play. Sean Astin puts in a reasonable performance and Vinnie Jones tries hard, but the rest of the cast was appalling. It's almost as if the principal cast was signed up, locations scouted, and then they knocked on doors at their locations and asked people if they wanted to be in a movie. The story had promise but it all fell in a heap. Awful. Time travel movies can tend to be disjointed, but if it's done well it all makes sense in the end. This makes sense it just doesn't seem worth the effort of watching. I ended up sticking with it till the end and was not rewarded for my efforts.
    1atkins-m

    So bad, it's painful to watch

    I really believe a fourth grader could have written better dialog and plot. The idea for this movie creates tremendous potential which is totally wasted on sheer stupidity of conversation and illogical plot. Movies involving time travel can be tricky but if done right, can also be very thought provoking. This movie doesn't even try to go there. This movie, like so many scifi's today, is overly focused on special effects with the plot and dialog treated as an afterthought. I'll have to remember the name, David Van Eyssen, and make concerted efforts NOT to watch anything directed by him. Foolish waste of time. I really have nothing more to say about this movie but the submission filter wants more lines. So here they are.
    1spammehard

    Insultingly bad....

    Where do these good reviews come from? With words and phrases like "accomplished," "mesmerizing," "visually stunning," "reminds me of the best moments from Blade runner and 2001," "Astin acts his heart out." Sounds to me like some PR people are doing damage control on the old IMDb in the hopes they can salvage some kind of life for this film on DVD. "I can't believe it wasn't theatrically released." Well, I can, and we should thank the studio execs who decided to give this movie a basic cable burial. They did so to preserve social harmony. If the general public had paid box office price to watch Slipstream, riots would have surely ensued.

    Make no mistake, people, this movie is BAD. The amazing directorial technique some seem to be so inexplicably impressed by is nothing but hack. Slow motion is used to signal the slowing down of time before a backwards trip, but it's also just used any old time to signify nothing other than the total running time needed to be longer to qualify as a feature-length film. Then there's the rotating camera. Why use the technique so much? Well they bought the rig, and darn it, they were going to use it. Stupid, horribly staged bank shootout? No worries, we've got a rotating camera. Stupid, horribly written and acted bus bathroom scene? No worries, we've got a rotating camera. And here's a dilemma, we've got two versions of a scene, one with the actors inside a car and one where they're outside, both are horribly written and acted, but we forgot to use the rotating camera. What do we do? No worries, we'll just inter-cut the two separate takes, and the lack of continuity will jar the stupider viewers into thinking that we "have a visual style." Yeah, that's right, I've been saying horribly acted. No one, in this movie is a great actor, by which I mean, has a great range. To the Astinites out there, sorry, but your boy is a serviceable actor at best. Without an extraordinary director and extraordinary writing, the mediocrity of Astin's performance is an unbearable distraction. He's had the good fortune to be in a few good movies in his career, but, left to his own devices, he will pick insipid little things like Slipstream simply because the script uses the phrase, "String Theory." This is a dangerous trait for a less-than amazing actor to possess. If he wises up, he will accept the role of supporting, character actor with grace. He cannot and should not attempt to carry a film.

    To give a little credit to the actors, including Astin, there's not much you can do with writing as terrible as this. There are no character arcs to speak of, just starting points and end points. How did they get there? What's the motivation? Who could be that stupid? Who cares! Have you seen our rotating camera? And, to all you aspiring directors, when faced with a script with no feeling and actors phoning it in, don't forget to use slow-motion. It saves the writer from having to write something compelling and the actor from having to emote. The slower you get it, the more emotional weight a scene can carry. And if you manage to have a rotating camera with slow-motion, whoa boy! Oscar can't be far behind. Or at the very least, a BAFTA.

    I've never, before watching Slipstream, felt it my duty to so harshly trash a film on the internet. I registered with IMDb because of it. Believe it or not, this is me at my most humanistic. Mankind should not have to watch this movie. If I can prevent one person, then I've done my part to make a better world.

    For the love of all that is good, go rent Donny Darko and stay far away from the abomination known as Slipstream.
    2smash016

    Mere pretentiousness

    Slipstream obviously is a bad movie. Now there are two types of bad movies. The first is of the Steven Seagal-category: meant to be cheap fun, and that's what it is. Poor film-making, but somehow fun to watch. The second category is where Slipstream fits into: meant to be original, innovative and artful yet all you get is mere pretentious junk. A Steven Seagal-picture knows it's terrible but doesn't want to be any more than terrible. Slipstream tries to be terrific but is actually the opposite, so in the end it's annoying as hell. The whole movie you're thinking: whoever made this should be sent to prison for insulting the intelligence of man. To sum up some of the things that went wrong with this flick: 1) the director uses all kinds of advanced techniques, mostly derived from The Matrix, for no purpose at all (a little like Swordfish but a thousand times worse), 2) the acting is totally unconvincing, people dying everywhere and the protagonists behaving like nothing is the matter, 3) huge plot holes everywhere, 4) an incredible load of editing errors, 5) everything is ripped from other movies, 6) this is the worst thing I've ever seen, 7) you shouldn't watch it, 8) forget all the positive comments around here. Thank you.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    O Julgamento do Diabo
    5,4
    O Julgamento do Diabo
    A Fúria
    6,7
    A Fúria
    Um Sonho Dentro de um Sonho
    4,8
    Um Sonho Dentro de um Sonho
    Nas Asas do Vento
    4,7
    Nas Asas do Vento
    Alexandria
    7,1
    Alexandria
    Slipstream
    6,8
    Slipstream
    Automatons
    4,5
    Automatons
    Labirinto do Tempo
    5,7
    Labirinto do Tempo
    Interkosmos
    5,7
    Interkosmos
    Ciclo Mortal
    5,3
    Ciclo Mortal
    Night at the Golden Eagle
    5,7
    Night at the Golden Eagle
    Puzzlehead
    5,6
    Puzzlehead

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Erros de gravação
      The action is set in the USA, but the bus in the hostage scene is right-hand drive and the door is on the left. This configuration is not used in the USA, but in South Africa where it was filmed.
    • Citações

      Stuart Conway: What happened?

      Sarah Tanner: You were dead. He shot you.

      Stuart Conway: Again? Will you please stop shooting me.

    • Conexões
      References Butch Cassidy (1969)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes13

    • How long is Slipstream?Fornecido pela Alexa

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 26 de agosto de 2005 (Portugal)
    • Países de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
      • África do Sul
      • Zâmbia
      • Alemanha
    • Centrais de atendimento oficiais
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Contra o Tempo
    • Locações de filme
      • Cape Town International Convention Centre, Cape Town, Western Cape, África do Sul
    • Empresas de produção
      • Film Afrika Worldwide
      • ApolloProMedia GmbH & Co. 1. Filmproduktion KG (I)
      • ApolloProMedia GmbH & Co. 2. Filmproduktion KG
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      1 hora 29 minutos
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby Digital
    • Proporção
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    Sean Astin in Slipstream (2005)
    Principal brecha
    By what name was Slipstream (2005) officially released in Canada in English?
    Responda
    • Veja mais brechas
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.