AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,0/10
569
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA woman discovers her new husband wants to keep her all to himself.A woman discovers her new husband wants to keep her all to himself.A woman discovers her new husband wants to keep her all to himself.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Michelle Chin
- Reporter
- (as Michelle Bradbury)
Douglas Kidd
- Tony (the waiter)
- (as Douglas Miller)
Helen Batabyal
- Woman in Restaurant
- (não creditado)
Karl Claude
- Uniformed Cop
- (não creditado)
Sally Clelford
- Cafe Patron
- (não creditado)
Jason Daley
- Detective
- (não creditado)
Jocelyn Forgues
- Cafe Patron
- (não creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
I loved this movie, To say Tracy Nelson is not a good actress is nuts. I think she's totally believable and a great actress. The movie had me on the edge of my seat. Tracy did the part like it was written,maybe she could of gotten out of the situation as some other reviewer said but that's not how the writers wrote her character. The actor who played the husband was absolutely nuts but played the part terrific. I was totally for Tracys character, she loved her husband and loved the child they were having together. He even killed their child making her have a miscarriage. This is the type of movie that gets you nuts but is fun to watch. I definitely want to add it to my collection!
We have seen the cliché plot (woman marries perfect husband but turns out to be a psychopath) many times.
In the 70s, 80s and 90s we were inundated with this theme in the true stories category, in which the story was almost always told one-sidedly from the female perspective and in which the perpetrator was usually portrayed in a very two-dimensional way without a satisfactory backstory.
This was of course to demonize the perpetrator as much as possible and to portray the victim character as sympathetically as possible.
But why not some more backstory for the perpetrator? That could give the story a lot more depth and make for a much interesting film.
Here too it is actually very cliché. The fact that the couple gets married after 4 months does not make it much more believable.
Of course this is a 13 in a dozen thriller, but still, there were moments in the film where I thought: boy, is this all you could come up with in terms of text dialogue? Such as in the dinner scene in which TY shows up uninvited and they ask him how he comes up with his characters in his books.
Funny that Michael Riley plays this role, I had seen him play alongside Brian Dennehy in To Catch a Killer and he played really well in it, even though Dennhy was superior as gacy.
In the 70s, 80s and 90s we were inundated with this theme in the true stories category, in which the story was almost always told one-sidedly from the female perspective and in which the perpetrator was usually portrayed in a very two-dimensional way without a satisfactory backstory.
This was of course to demonize the perpetrator as much as possible and to portray the victim character as sympathetically as possible.
But why not some more backstory for the perpetrator? That could give the story a lot more depth and make for a much interesting film.
Here too it is actually very cliché. The fact that the couple gets married after 4 months does not make it much more believable.
Of course this is a 13 in a dozen thriller, but still, there were moments in the film where I thought: boy, is this all you could come up with in terms of text dialogue? Such as in the dinner scene in which TY shows up uninvited and they ask him how he comes up with his characters in his books.
Funny that Michael Riley plays this role, I had seen him play alongside Brian Dennehy in To Catch a Killer and he played really well in it, even though Dennhy was superior as gacy.
Caught this one late at night after a long day of work and couldn't sleep. This one didn't disappoint as it was slower and the spouse didn't loose his sh- until mid-way through the movie allowing for character development. Tracy Nelson is sympathetic as the ensnared wife and the husband wasn't just the one-dimensional psychopath. The actor who played him's performance was nuanced and you genuinely see that crazy-evil thing going on in his head. I'm actually going to go a step further and actually recommend this one (I don't normally do that with LMNs) but only if you have nerves of steel. The second half of the movie is very nerve-wracking and you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat when as the wife becomes injured and is seeminly rendered helpless.
This is my favorite Lifetime movie! It's the king of wacky Lifetime! Ty Kellington is hilarious and played to absolute perfection by Michael Riley. For such a typical premise (insecure, jealous controlling husband) it could've been dull but there's twist and turns and you're never bored.
For made-for-TV, this is better than average, though it doesn't bring anything original to the screen. Michael Riley does a good job of switching from the perfect to not-so-perfect husband in an instant, and his character is what keeps you watching. The rest of the acting is a bit bland, and instead of fearing for our protagonist, you identify more with our villain.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Dr. Kiley diagnoses Lisa with a fractured ankled and torn ligaments, she only uses x-rays. You cannot see ligaments on a x-ray, only bones.
- Citações
Ty Kellington: You're being very rude right now.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosA train whistle is heard near the end of the ending credits scroll.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 34 min(94 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente