[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais popularesFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroMais populares no cinemaHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de cinemaFilmes indianos em destaque
    O que está na TV e no streaming250 séries mais popularesSéries mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias da TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts da IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuidePrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Nascido hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorSondagens
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Possuída: O Início

Título original: Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
  • 2004
  • R
  • 1 h 34 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,8/10
12 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins in Possuída: O Início (2004)
Werewolf HorrorDramaHorrorThriller

No Canadá do século 19, Brigette e sua irmã, Ginger, se refugiam no Forte dos Comerciantes que, mais tarde, fica sob o cerco de alguns lobisomens selvagens.No Canadá do século 19, Brigette e sua irmã, Ginger, se refugiam no Forte dos Comerciantes que, mais tarde, fica sob o cerco de alguns lobisomens selvagens.No Canadá do século 19, Brigette e sua irmã, Ginger, se refugiam no Forte dos Comerciantes que, mais tarde, fica sob o cerco de alguns lobisomens selvagens.

  • Direção
    • Grant Harvey
  • Roteiristas
    • Christina Ray
    • Stephen Massicotte
  • Artistas
    • Katharine Isabelle
    • Emily Perkins
    • Nathaniel Arcand
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,8/10
    12 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Grant Harvey
    • Roteiristas
      • Christina Ray
      • Stephen Massicotte
    • Artistas
      • Katharine Isabelle
      • Emily Perkins
      • Nathaniel Arcand
    • 101Avaliações de usuários
    • 40Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 1 indicação no total

    Vídeos1

    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
    Trailer 2:02
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning

    Fotos146

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 141
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal16

    Editar
    Katharine Isabelle
    Katharine Isabelle
    • Ginger
    Emily Perkins
    Emily Perkins
    • Brigitte
    Nathaniel Arcand
    Nathaniel Arcand
    • Hunter
    JR Bourne
    JR Bourne
    • James
    Hugh Dillon
    Hugh Dillon
    • Reverend Gilbert
    Adrien Dorval
    Adrien Dorval
    • Seamus
    Brendan Fletcher
    Brendan Fletcher
    • Finn
    David La Haye
    David La Haye
    • Claude
    • (as David LaHaye)
    Tom McCamus
    Tom McCamus
    • Wallace Rowlands
    Matthew Walker
    Matthew Walker
    • Doc Murphy
    Fabian Bird
    • Milo
    Kirk Jarrett
    Kirk Jarrett
    • Owen
    David MacInnis
    David MacInnis
    • Cormac
    Stevie Mitchell
    • Geoffrey
    Edna Rain
    • Elder
    Jake McKinnon
    Jake McKinnon
    • Hellhound
    • (não creditado)
    • Direção
      • Grant Harvey
    • Roteiristas
      • Christina Ray
      • Stephen Massicotte
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários101

    5,812.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    5LeonLouisRicci

    Painfully Slow

    Origin Stories are Cool, most of the time. But in the Original Ginger Snaps the Origin was Original enough to make it the Sleeper Hit of its Era. It was sharp, smart, and, yes, snappy. This Movie is none of the above, it is dull, depressing, and slow.

    It looks good and there seemed to be some Energy in the Production but it all gets lost in a wildly muddled Script. The Characters are all bland and the Native American Curse stuff is painful and confusing. Our two Sisters huddle together forever and look out of place and out of time/space.

    An unwanted and ill received mess, this is not horrible but really takes an effort to like. A shame, because the Audience is with this from the beginning. Bringing along previous thoughts and anxieties from the first two Movies that had a genuine allure.

    This one is Soul less with rough edges that are never smoothed into a believable and exciting Film. It tries way too hard to be a Profound Period Piece, adding depth to the Trilogy. In the end it is an unwelcome miss on most levels, but Horror Fans may give it a Pass. Ginger Snap Fans may give it a Fail.
    8claudio_carvalho

    Great Beginning of a Curse

    In 1815, in Canada, the sisters Ginger (Katharine Isabelle) and Brigitte (Emily Perkins) survive to a boat sinking, where her parents die. Alone and lost in the forest, they meet an old clairvoyant Indian that foresees their fate. Later, they are guided by the Indian The Hunter (Nathaniel Arcand) to a fort, and they seek for shelter with the men of the Northern Legion Trading Company. They note that the place is under siege of "Wendigos", a sort of werewolf that has killed most of the dwellers of the place, and the survivals are very afraid. Their lives are put in danger by the deranged locals and by the surrounding beasts.

    I usually hate sequels and remakes, but "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning" is a great movie and I liked it more than the cult "Ginger Snaps". The cold cinematography is very sad and beautiful. The good story try to explain the curse of the two sisters, but is completely different from "Ginger Snaps" and "Ginger Snaps: Unleashed". It uses only the characters of Ginger and Brigitte, and werewolves of course, taking place in different time and situations. The costumes of the sisters, specially the dark "Little Red Riding Hood" clothes of Ginger, are scary and complete the atmosphere imposing a sort of fear. The make-up of the werewolves is excellent. The DVD is full of Extras. Therefore, I liked this film a lot and highly recommend it to the fans of these cult characters. My vote is eight.

    Title (Brazil): "Possuída – O Início" ("Possessed – The Beginning")
    6matt-1252

    Watchable, but shallow

    What made the original Ginger Snaps a classic horror movie is the way it used the genre to explore universal themes. It offered a unique take on sibling rivalry, death, suicide, puberty, feminism, sexuality and love. Most poignantly, it gave us Ginger, a complex character with a genuine hatred of herself and everything around her.

    Ginger Snaps also introduced Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins, two talented, beautiful and utterly believable actresses. So while I was a bit put off by the premise of Ginger Snaps Back, I was excited for the chance to watch the girls reprise their roles.

    Ginger Snaps Back is a very watchable movie. It re-imagines the sisters in a different era, which is interesting. It's creepy. The special effects are much better than in the original. The climax is very cool. And the sisters are both perfectly portrayed. Unfortunately, when it was over, I wasn't thinking about my own mortality. I was just thinking, "Hey, cool werewolves."

    I was also irritated by the dialog. Most of the time, the characters speak in stilted sentences appropriate to the era. But occasionally, Ginger drops a pithy one liner or a curse word which seems completely out of place.

    The supporting cast was filled with stereotypes. The harsh minister and the sage native American hunter were especially flat.

    Ginger Snaps Back gives you two things. An entertaining werewolf movie. And an excuse to watch two talented actresses portray Ginger and Brigitte. But it doesn't give you anything beyond that.
    5juliankennedy23

    Werewolf? Therewolf!

    Ginger Snaps Back the Beginning: 5/10: The original Ginger Snaps truly deserves its cult classic label. Leads Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins created original characters that transcended both the teen angst genre as well as werewolf films needless to say. The second sequel transports both characters to the 19th century Canadian wilderness. The good news is that the girls and their relationship is exactly the same as the first film. The bad news is that the first film took place in modern suburbia and the girls' characterization simply couldn't feel more out of place. It's like coming across a valley girl in a WWI Drama.

    Anachronisms aside what they really don't have from the first film is the witty banter and subtext of the story. The script is a true bare bones affair with that old Assault on Precinct 13, Rio Bravo plot. But instead of gang members our antagonists are werewolves. Now this plot can work mind you (See Dog Soldiers for a perfect werewolves trapping people movie) but with the first two Snaps films about puberty and addiction a trapped with crazy people plot line is quite a let down.

    The script is lazy in other ways as well. We have a ridiculous preacher character that would have been thrown out of 17th century Salem for being too fundamentalist and we also have endless Native American (okay Native Canadian) mumbo jumbo.

    There are very very few things that grate on my nerves faster in a movie than the wise Indian character with the endless intelligible incantations and feathered dream catchers. And of course they predict the future and give warnings of bad tidings and initially scare our girls but turn out to be the real good guys that everyone treats badly. Pretty generic and lazy screen writing.

    Needless to say the movie is all over the map. The end is good, the werewolves look good and honestly I can watch Katharine Isabelle all day long. The plot however is a really a mess and Snaps really doesn't make much sense if you haven't seen the other two Ginger Snaps films and even less sense if you have.
    8rob30316

    A great movie in its own right

    Neither sequel has been nearly as good as the original, but considering how brilliant "Ginger Snaps" was, no one could reasonably expect that. Actually, my main disappointment with both sequels is that I wanted what GS had--horror, humor, hipness, irony. But anytime there's a sequel that tries to be the original, it fails because it tried to emulate the first installment. Both sequels have completely different story lines and character. The only real continuity is in the characterization and the themes. And that's a brilliant decision. I probably liked "The Beginning" better than "Unleashed," but I just finished watching the former, so I can't be objective. It is, in its own right, a really terrific film. All of the films have had their fair share of visual panache, but this one is so beautiful it reminded me of "Sleepy Hollow" at times. I almost wish they'd been released under completely different titles--I can't help but compare the sequels to the original, and they're not really sequels. They all feature the same two leading actress; they're all about werewolves; "Unleashed" even picks up after the first left off. But you could watch "Unleashed" without having seen "Ginger Snaps" and still know what's going on, and since the third starts close to 200 years before the first, you obviously don't have to see the others. They're separate films connected by actresses and themes, as I see it. Speaking of the actresses--Emily Perkins and Isabelle Katherine are, of course, beyond reproach. Their direction is wrong; they don't fit in to the milieu they're put in, but I think that's a director error. Or the director's way of maintaining the integrity of the characters we know from the first two movies. Ginger and Bridget can't exactly be Puritans, can they? Next to the drop-dead brilliant score Mike Shields composed for the original, this soundtrack doesn't stand a chance. But it works very, very well with the setting and the action. I had to watch one scene towards the end (the fire) twice only because of the music. One thing I absolutely loved, though found a bit campy--Ginger spends half the movie dressed as Little Red Riding Hood, though her hood, and the rest of her clothes, are black...It makes for some stunning cinematography, though. So basically, after "Ginger Snaps," it's a bit of a letdown. But not taking the original into account, it's an incredible film that you shouldn't miss.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Possuída 2: Força Incontrolável
    6,4
    Possuída 2: Força Incontrolável
    Possuída
    6,8
    Possuída
    Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - Deleted Scenes
    7,0
    Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed - Deleted Scenes
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes
    6,1
    Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes
    Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth and Fur
    7,7
    Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth and Fur
    Amaldiçoados
    5,1
    Amaldiçoados
    May, Obsessão Assassina
    6,6
    May, Obsessão Assassina
    Lua Negra
    5,8
    Lua Negra
    Um Lobisomem Americano em Paris
    5,1
    Um Lobisomem Americano em Paris
    Lobisomem: A Besta Entre Nós
    5,1
    Lobisomem: A Besta Entre Nós
    American Mary
    6,2
    American Mary
    A Fera Assassina
    5,2
    A Fera Assassina

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Shot back-to-back with Possuída 2: Força Incontrolável (2004).
    • Erros de gravação
      The movie states it takes place in 1815. All of the rifles/muskets used in the movie are percussion locks, not flintlocks. The percussion cap was invented in the early 1820's. Percussion style rifles did not start becoming prevalent until the 1840's. In fact many of the "Northwest trading companies" produced flintlock trade guns well into the late 1880's.
    • Citações

      Ginger: Come closer... it's a secret.

      [smiles through canine teeth]

      Ginger: [whispers] they're coming.

    • Cenas durante ou pós-créditos
      Near the end of the credits, it says "No animals or werewolves were harmed badly during the production of this film."
    • Versões alternativas
      The DVD release contains deleted scenes. The additional footage is as follows:
      • While looking for a set of keys, Finn tells the girls that he is a map maker. The girls ask what has happened at the fort. Finn doesn't answer them. They see a pile of werewolf drawings on a desk, and look at Finn questioningly. He says that the pictures are of old wives tales.
      • An extended dinner scene with additional dialogue amongst the men. Seamus says that the scripture has made Gilbert twisted. James loudly questions Hunter's motives for staying at the fort. Seamus defends Hunter. Hunter puts a knife to James' throat before letting him go. Rowlands begins to make a speech before being interrupted by the howling of werewolves outside.
      • Returning to the fort after helping Ginger escape, Brigitte is brought before Rowlands. Gilbert claims she is a disciple of the devil and will steal the souls of the men. Rowlands tells Brigitte that when he looked into his son's eyes before shooting him, he saw nothing. He then says that when he looks into Brigitte's eyes, he sees only her sister. He tells the men they can do what they want with Brigitte, and that he washes his hands of the whole thing.
      • An extended burial scene where Gilbert makes several veiled attacks towards Seamus' personal life.
    • Conexões
      Edited into Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning - Deleted Scenes (2004)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes28

    • How long is Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • What kind of natives are featured in the film?
    • What is 'Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning' about?
    • Is "Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning" based on a book?

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 27 de agosto de 2004 (Canadá)
    • País de origem
      • Canadá
    • Idiomas
      • Inglês
      • Cree
    • Também conhecido como
      • Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning
    • Locações de filme
      • Fort Edmonton Park - Fox Drive and Whitemud Drive, Edmonton, Londres, Canadá
    • Empresas de produção
      • 49 Films
      • Combustion
      • Lions Gate Films
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • CA$ 3.500.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      1 hora 34 minutos
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
    • Proporção
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins in Possuída: O Início (2004)
    Principal brecha
    By what name was Possuída: O Início (2004) officially released in India in English?
    Responda
    • Veja mais brechas
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.