A advogada Claire Kubik vê seu mundo de cabeça para baixo quando seu marido, que vivia com um nome falso, é preso pela polícia militar e levado a julgamento pelo assassinato de aldeões enqua... Ler tudoA advogada Claire Kubik vê seu mundo de cabeça para baixo quando seu marido, que vivia com um nome falso, é preso pela polícia militar e levado a julgamento pelo assassinato de aldeões enquanto estava na Marinha.A advogada Claire Kubik vê seu mundo de cabeça para baixo quando seu marido, que vivia com um nome falso, é preso pela polícia militar e levado a julgamento pelo assassinato de aldeões enquanto estava na Marinha.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 2 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
This may look like just another one of those 'trial' movies, but this isn't. It is actually quite good if you just look past the typical plot and watch it. Other recommendations include A FEW GOOD MEN and RULES OF ENGAGEMENT. They are both a little different, but still go along the same lines.
This film is for people who appreciate good, old-fashioned suspense thrillers. These kind of movies are the kind people need to show us that looks can be deceiving and that people are not always what they appear to be.
HIGH CRIMES: 5/5.
That question keeps the viewer guessing for much of the film and provides some very good suspense. It's another film, however, in which there is a strong anti-U.S. military flavor, so typical in films since the 1960s.
Also, once you know the ending, I doubt if this would be a movie you would watch more than once. However, it's definitely worth a look and will entertain you for about two hours. Ashley Judd, Jim Caviezel and Morgan Freeman are three attractive lead actors, all interesting to watch, as usual.
The acting is surprisedly well, especially by Caviezel. I didn't understand why he had that "outburst" at the end, but that's a minor detail. Judd is equally good as Claire, except she seemed to be too slow at some parts. So did the pacing. It seemed to drag on a little, and the genre seemed to be more like a courtroom drama instead of a crime thriller.
Morgan Freeman is OK as the lawyer Claire hires. His acting seemed a little forced at times, though. The plot, though nothing new, was one of those that were predictable, but I was enjoying it too much to care. It's very entertaining if you just sit back and watch it instead of scrutinizing every little detail of it.
But, at the end, after the final court scene, it seems to continue on for a little long after spending an hour and a half leading up to that part. The running time was a little long. And the ever-lovable Amanda Peet plays a role where she could have gotten more time and shown off her acting ability. If you sit back for two hours and leave your mind on hold, it's a very entertaining yarn.
My rating: 7/10
Rated PG-13 violence and some language.
A woman must uncover national security secrets to clear her husband,accused of war crimes in El Salvador.
Best Performance: Morgan Freeman Worst Performance: Jim Caviezel
The film is both suspenseful and intriguing, with very fine performance from all the cast. Most of the film is quite interesting and even compelling at times, as the mystery builds and then as it begins to unravel. The surprise ending however, lets the movie down; when with more attention to detail it could have been quite impressive and really could have made the movie.
By the end you are left feeling a bit unfulfilled, mainly due to all the smoke and mirrors used to make the ending a shock.
6/10 should have been better, but it's watchable
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesIn early versions of the script, Ashley Judd's character was to be a Harvard law professor.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe presiding Judge threatened to send Charlie Grimes to the brig for improper trial conduct. Mr. Grimes is a civilian and the judge doesn't have the authority to detain him in a military jail.
- Citações
[Charlie and his dog Delilah's answering machine]
Charlie Grimes: This is C.W. Grimes and associates. If you wanna talk to Charlie you should leave a message after the beep. I you wanna talk to Delilah, you should get your head examined!
- ConexõesFeatured in High Crimes: A Military Mystery (2002)
Principais escolhas
- How long is High Crimes?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Crimen en primer grado
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 42.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 41.543.917
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 14.005.550
- 7 de abr. de 2002
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 63.781.810
- Tempo de duração1 hora 55 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1