[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

The Other Side of the Underneath

  • 1972
  • 2 h 22 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
566
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
The Other Side of the Underneath (1972)
Drama

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaJane Arden's surreal take on a group of females in a therapy session.Jane Arden's surreal take on a group of females in a therapy session.Jane Arden's surreal take on a group of females in a therapy session.

  • Direção
    • Jane Arden
  • Roteirista
    • Jane Arden
  • Artistas
    • Sheila Allen
    • Susanka Fraey
    • Liz Danciger
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    6,1/10
    566
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Jane Arden
    • Roteirista
      • Jane Arden
    • Artistas
      • Sheila Allen
      • Susanka Fraey
      • Liz Danciger
    • 7Avaliações de usuários
    • 9Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos16

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 10
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal13

    Editar
    Sheila Allen
    • Meg the Peg
    Susanka Fraey
    Liz Danciger
    Ann Lynn
    Ann Lynn
    Penny Slinger
    Jane Arden
    Jane Arden
    • Therapist
    Sally Minford
    • Cellist
    Jenny Moss
    Elaine Donovan
    Jack Bond
    Bill Deasey
    Lis Kustow
      Rosie Marcham
      • Direção
        • Jane Arden
      • Roteirista
        • Jane Arden
      • Elenco e equipe completos
      • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

      Avaliações de usuários7

      6,1566
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10

      Avaliações em destaque

      7gajodaw-731-933063

      There is so much more to this

      I don't feel this film can be divorced from Jane Arden's evolution in to radical feminism and R. D Laing's 'Anti-Psychiatry' movement of the 60's. It is more than a film, it is a jarring polemic. Jane Arden and Jack Bond made 3 of the most unique 'art films' of British cinema: 'Separation', 'The other side of underneath' and 'Anti-Clock' (in which they experimented with and pioneered video techniques). Not a trilogy more a triptych on the sense of self, it's disintegration and the internal and external influences on that process. Where as 'Separation' can be humorous and 'Ant-Clock' dream like. 'The other side of underneath' is a dark night of the soul, the nightmare that lingers when you wake. All beyond narrative description. Caveat Inspectoris (I have never studied Latin please don't be harsh)
      1selfdestructo

      (Throws arms up in the air)

      Let's see, definitively avant-garde, British, absolutely no narrative, everyone's on LSD, it's 1972, a cacophony of a soundtrack, nearly two hours. What can possibly appeal to me in this film? As it turns out, NOTHING.

      It starts out as nonsense, devolves into further levels of nonsense, the asylum throws out a mental patient, who in turn, aimlessly wanders the countryside, observing filthy hippies, doing all sorts of... nonsense, I think she's crucified? Then she returns from the dead (given that was even her... it made the cover, anyway), takes the very last fistful of psychedelics (offscreen) and performs with a bunch of freaks, which brings us to the abrupt thud of a nonsensical ending. Hey, this filmmaker is posthumously finally getting her due respect in the cult film world!

      Ouch. I can't believe I made it through the whole thing, as there's absolutely nothing to grasp onto. I watched this as the fourth and final movie of the House of Psychotic Women box set, culled as one of the four very best in Kier-La Janisse's book of the same name. Granted, I really, REALLY dug the first two movies, Identikit, and I Like Bats (of which it could be argued the woman in it is not psychotic at all, she's a vampire! And it's a comedy! She isn't someone who THINKS she's a vampire, and behaves as one, she IS one). Anyhow, there's a severe nosedive in quality with the remaining two, with three scores/soundtracks progressively getting more and more horrifying.

      Either Janisse is much, much smarter than I am, or the introductions she gives for each movie is a series of ramblings, and habitual tangents. I found next-to no light shed on any of these films. I gleaned more info in other supplements.

      Seems like I've gone off on a tangent of my own. Oh, there's gotta be a bizarro audience for a film like this, and it ain't me. I can only describe it as grating, insufferable, and embarrassing. There's a rather violent fake-murder between two mental patients (in a basement, I guess?), with both participants clearly in outer space on God-knows-what, done to the tune of ("live") Britain's worst acid rock band. Hell, get in a time machine, travel back to England in the late 60's/early 70's, throw a rock and you will hit one. I'm sure finding these guys was one of the easier production tasks.

      Zero point zero.

      Extras: In surrealist Penny Slinger's interview segment, where they discuss (and show extended clips of) her career in film and photos, I was reminded of my years in school studying Fine Arts. The way they evaluated (and read in to) her abstract and surreal work was exactly like the art critiques that I so many times participated in. What can I read into this film? Ya freakin' got me. I'm sure there's some feminist messages to be found in the confrontational "psychologist" scenes inside the asylum, but the movie is primarily a series of meandering, random scenes.

      Fun fact: In another extra, one participant reveals writer/director Jane Arden (who also plays the doctor) was drunk the entire duration (just guessing, she was an angry drunk), and all the women in the asylum scenes were fed acid. These facts alone make this film something I would have an aversion to.
      9johndavies007

      A female director's powerfully expressive and personal exploration of mental health issues.

      Apparently the only British film directed solely by a woman (Jane Arden) in the 1970s, The Other Side of Underneath is quite harrowing and claustrophobic, taking us into the minds of female psychiatric patients in Wales, with discordant screeching sounds and strange searing and hallucinatory images. It seems to subvert not only polite society but also the repression of sexuality; late in the film we have a relative, almost idyllic sense of freedom, with an open air coupling. There's something of Max Ernst and Edvard Munch about the film, but this is very much from a female perspective, implying that society for too long has damagingly frowned on female sexual feelings as unclean. Scenes with Romanies and a few black children are telling, underlining the shared status of unwanted powerless outsiders. Alongside almost infernal visions, the film also questions attitudes to religion and neglect of a more natural life.

      Maybe wretchedly self-indulgent, relentless and disgusting to some, for me it's a serious, persuasive and emotion-churning examination of "mental illness", one of the boldest films to emerge from the UK, but one from which i was relieved to step out into the warm sunlight.
      1shandycr

      The blatant side of utter rubbish

      This is my second attempt at doing a review.

      Okay, this is a supposedly 'avant garde' film, and if you think of Derek Jarman's early features as 'avant garde', consider them like John Waters but without intentional comedy.

      This is absolutely laughable rubbish, and having read that it's likely everyone involved was imbibing and ingesting certain substances, that certainly comes across on the waste of celluloid. It's literally just people doing 'free form' freakouts, that are meant to be expressive and deep and meaningful. Unfortunately this just means that there's a ton of nuddy women and an extremely graphic sequence that lasts forever involving some digits.

      The main thing I took from this was concern for the number of children that happened to get in the way of the front of the camera, and thus evidently involved in the production of all the drug-taking and goodness knows what milieu.

      We're supposed to be grateful that this 'artiste' had her work preserved because her life 'tragically' ended a few years later as she was a drunk. No, this is utter rubbish and whatever 'arts council' or similarly trendy project that threw the confetti money at her to make this has not changed in the subsequent 50 years.

      I've got to add. Her attitude towards women is plainly poisonous. Simultaneously seeing them as sexual objects then wanting them to destroy each other. What a disgusting individual.
      5bobhartshorn

      Enough already!

      Being the only film of 1972 solely written & directed by a woman who would tragically commit suicide 10 years later at the age of 55 would, surely, cancel out any impact a gratuitously experimental and excruciating experience like this one might have to offer. But Jane Arden's linear-free schizo-mental health examination remains brain numbing hard work for anyone with the courage & patience to sit through it.

      Beginning with images & ambiance similar to that found in the previous year's Lets Scare Jessica To Death (itself an exploration of a woman losing her marbles), TOSOTU Starts promisingly but quickly buckles under the weight of a too-much-too-soon dosage prescribed by the heavy-handed Dr Arden.

      A young lady pulled from a lake in an undisclosed part of the Welsh countryside winds up in what can only be described as an all female funny farm for avant-garde theatre performance artists. There is no plot or characters so to speak of, only a bloody-minded desire on behalf of the filmmaker to set her creative co-ordinates to eleven on the launch pad and blast off into the solar system for the best part of two hours before crash-landing somewhere in the region of Zeta Reticuli. One can only assume by that point the coffers must have run dry for film stock.

      There is certainly no question of the director's earnest sincerity broaching the weighty subject matter. But the ruthless disregard for linear dynamics disallows any point of entry other than to smirk or guffaw at the serious-as-a-heart-attack images of women sharing beds with sheep whilst taunted by Mr Punch's ugly sister or, birthday suited nymphs flanking cellos in the Green Green Grass of Home (at least composer Sally Minford's oppressive string arrangements hit the vulnerable dark spot).

      I find it hard to believe that even back then this was considered fresh and challenging, especially considering the likes of Ken Russell had been there, seen it and vommed on the t-shirt with this sort of visual excess a million times before already. Meanwhile, over at the BBC, the Monty Python gang were running full throttle dropping raspberry stink- bombs on targets like Arden's school of pretension with devastating precision. Their merciless lampooning of the great King Ken's work in the 'Gardening Club' sketch should give you a good idea of what you're letting yourself in for.

      Whilst I do have a big appetite for seeking out the more cutting edge offerings to be found hidden away in the dead-letter-office of secret cinema, this is one I feel has not stood the test of time and would've preferred to have left under lock and key.

      Mais itens semelhantes

      Lubie nietoperze
      5,5
      Lubie nietoperze
      The Collingswood Story
      5,2
      The Collingswood Story
      Queer for Fear: The History of Queer Horror
      7,3
      Queer for Fear: The History of Queer Horror
      Síndrome Mortal
      6,0
      Síndrome Mortal
      May, Obsessão Assassina
      6,6
      May, Obsessão Assassina
      O Ladrão de Cavalos
      6,8
      O Ladrão de Cavalos
      Golem
      6,6
      Golem
      Anti-Clock
      6,1
      Anti-Clock
      Noite do Espantalho
      6,7
      Noite do Espantalho
      Uma Cabana no Céu
      7,1
      Uma Cabana no Céu
      Santa Sangre
      7,5
      Santa Sangre
      O Sono Tem Sua Morada
      6,9
      O Sono Tem Sua Morada

      Enredo

      Editar

      Você sabia?

      Editar
      • Curiosidades
        Alcohol and LSD use was rampant from the crew during production, particularly with Arden. The filmmaking process was so painfully intense for almost everyone involved that it brought an end to the Holocaust theatre company, and the majority of participants parted ways for good.
      • Citações

        Masked woman: Strength, little girl, is madness. And madness is a persistent belief in one's own hatefulness ... lightning in the brain.

      • Conexões
        Featured in Penny Slinger: Out of the Shadows (2017)
      • Trilhas sonoras
        Soldiers' Chorus from 'Faust'
        (uncredited)

        Music by Charles Gounod

      Principais escolhas

      Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
      Fazer login

      Perguntas frequentes

      • How long is The Other Side of Underneath?
        Fornecido pela Alexa

      Detalhes

      Editar
      • Data de lançamento
        • 9 de fevereiro de 1973 (Reino Unido)
      • País de origem
        • Reino Unido
      • Idioma
        • Inglês
      • Também conhecido como
        • The Other Side of Underneath
      • Locações de filme
        • Abertillery, Blaenau Gwent, Gales, Reino Unido(film credits)
      • Empresa de produção
        • Bond
      • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

      Especificações técnicas

      Editar
      • Tempo de duração
        2 horas 22 minutos
      • Mixagem de som
        • Mono
      • Proporção
        • 1.33 : 1

      Contribua para esta página

      Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
      The Other Side of the Underneath (1972)
      Principal brecha
      By what name was The Other Side of the Underneath (1972) officially released in India in English?
      Responda
      • Veja mais brechas
      • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
      Editar página

      Explore mais

      Vistos recentemente

      Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
      Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
      Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
      Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
      Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
      Para Android e iOS
      Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
      • Ajuda
      • Índice do site
      • IMDbPro
      • Box Office Mojo
      • Dados da licença do IMDb
      • Sala de imprensa
      • Anúncios
      • Empregos
      • Condições de uso
      • Política de privacidade
      • Your Ads Privacy Choices
      IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

      © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.