AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,8/10
282
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA wife whose goal is power begins a game of manipulation that insidiously destroys her family.A wife whose goal is power begins a game of manipulation that insidiously destroys her family.A wife whose goal is power begins a game of manipulation that insidiously destroys her family.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Fotos
Scott Forbes
- Dr. Valentine Christie
- (as Julian Dallas)
Gus McNaughton
- Vet Surgeon
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
Soooo similar to queen bee, or harriet craig! Sylvia, a very controlling wife and mother, can't help herself, and is determined to have everything happen just the way she pictures it. Joan crawford must have been busy when they filmed this! But of course, this is from a british production company, excelsior films. When sylvia's daughter announces that she's getting married, sylvia tries to interfere and talk her out of it. She doesn't seem to approve of the new son in law. Very loud, dramatic, piano music always playing. Sometimes it's quite intrusive. Sylvia's zest to personally move the pieces around the chess board angers the rest of her family. And she's driving everyone apart. Except for the maid; she seems to be encouraging even the maid to come between her daughter's marriage. Can this all be worked out? Will anyone stand up to mom and tell her to butt out? It's entertaining. Based on the play by joan morgan. She had started as a very young actress, and worked with her director dad sydney morgan many times. It doesn't quite have the crawford edge, but it's good! Film directed by tim whelan. Didn't win any oscars, but he should have! He sure worked with some big stars.... spencer tracy, jimmy stewart, harold lloyd, conrad veidt.
The formidable Sonia Dresdel reprises her stage role as the monstrous Sylvia Russell, manipulative, sadistic, and finally murderous. Venerating power and success, she demoralizes her husband and schemes to break up her daughter's marriage, though it is not altogether clear as to what she stands to gain from the latter act. In the course of this she attempts to corrupt the maid, including lending her an under-the-counter edition of Lady Chatterley's Lover, then banned in Britain though available in English versions from France, and quite possible to get hold of if you had the money. (Had the prosecutor in the later obscenity trial, who famously asked the jury whether they would be happy if their wives or servants read it, watched this by any chance?). There is also a suggestion of lesbianism as Sylvia strokes the maid's hair, telling her how beautiful she is.
Though some these days could no doubt advance other explanations for Sylvia's behaviour, the original play opened in 1944, and with her cruelty and belief that the ends justify the means, she was surely intended as an embodiment of those evils we were supposedly fighting. It had been written by Joan Morgan, another remarkable woman, an actress in silent films turned playwright who lived on into the present century. In common with several other British films from this period, including Compton Bennett's Daybreak, and Lawrence Huntington's The Upturned Glass, there is a very dark and pessimistic outlook on human nature, reflecting a general mood of despair at recent revelations to the depths to which humanity could sink. Though there is some hope, in that Sylvia's nemesis comes partially through her son, whom has inherited something of her iron will, and as doctor will be caring for rather than destroying others.
The film's main weakness is the lack of any explanation of why Sylvia's poisonous character has never manifested itself previously during all those years she had been bringing up the family. There is no sign of rationing and few people post-war could afford servants so it is presumably set in the late Thirties. It does remain fairly theatrical, though this enables a great power and tension to build in the final scenes. And some of the acting from the younger members of the cast is remarkably feeble. Nevertheless, this is another British film of its time that deserves to be much better known. Not always an easy watch for dog lovers though.
Though some these days could no doubt advance other explanations for Sylvia's behaviour, the original play opened in 1944, and with her cruelty and belief that the ends justify the means, she was surely intended as an embodiment of those evils we were supposedly fighting. It had been written by Joan Morgan, another remarkable woman, an actress in silent films turned playwright who lived on into the present century. In common with several other British films from this period, including Compton Bennett's Daybreak, and Lawrence Huntington's The Upturned Glass, there is a very dark and pessimistic outlook on human nature, reflecting a general mood of despair at recent revelations to the depths to which humanity could sink. Though there is some hope, in that Sylvia's nemesis comes partially through her son, whom has inherited something of her iron will, and as doctor will be caring for rather than destroying others.
The film's main weakness is the lack of any explanation of why Sylvia's poisonous character has never manifested itself previously during all those years she had been bringing up the family. There is no sign of rationing and few people post-war could afford servants so it is presumably set in the late Thirties. It does remain fairly theatrical, though this enables a great power and tension to build in the final scenes. And some of the acting from the younger members of the cast is remarkably feeble. Nevertheless, this is another British film of its time that deserves to be much better known. Not always an easy watch for dog lovers though.
1945's "Leave Her to Heaven" is a classic film about an evil and mentally disturbed woman who destroys people. It's a great film. "This Was a Woman" is a similar sort of movie, though not nearly the same quality....mostly because it lacked the subtlety of the Hollywood movie.
The story is set in the home of a well to do English family, the Russells. The mother, Sylvia, is vicious and it's strange that it takes everyone so long to realize this. It's odd, even after putting the family dog to sleep for no particular reason, folks don't seem to think she's a bit off! And why did she do this? Her daughter was getting married and Sylvia didn't approve...so she took the dog to the vet to put it down! Soon after, she does everything she can to ruin the marriage...though you're never really sure why. Later, for kicks, she poisons her husband...something clearly telegraphed in the film when she's caught reading up on that sort of thing.
As I already mentioned, Sylvia isn't exactly subtle and that's a problem with the story. Clearly, she's an awful person but oddly no one in the family seems to notice...until it's too late. Had the movie been more subtle and had Sylvia's actions been more covert, it would have improved it tremendously. Now I am not saying it's a bad film...but with a few minor changes, it could have been marvelous. Instead, it just had me wish I'd re-watched "Leave Her to Heaven".
The story is set in the home of a well to do English family, the Russells. The mother, Sylvia, is vicious and it's strange that it takes everyone so long to realize this. It's odd, even after putting the family dog to sleep for no particular reason, folks don't seem to think she's a bit off! And why did she do this? Her daughter was getting married and Sylvia didn't approve...so she took the dog to the vet to put it down! Soon after, she does everything she can to ruin the marriage...though you're never really sure why. Later, for kicks, she poisons her husband...something clearly telegraphed in the film when she's caught reading up on that sort of thing.
As I already mentioned, Sylvia isn't exactly subtle and that's a problem with the story. Clearly, she's an awful person but oddly no one in the family seems to notice...until it's too late. Had the movie been more subtle and had Sylvia's actions been more covert, it would have improved it tremendously. Now I am not saying it's a bad film...but with a few minor changes, it could have been marvelous. Instead, it just had me wish I'd re-watched "Leave Her to Heaven".
Sylvia Russel is akin to Harriet Craig ,one of Joan Crawford's triumphs (1950) ; and Sonia Dresdel's impressive performance compares favorably with her American colleague's.
Sylvia is even more terrifying than Harriet: if eyes could kill ,hers certainly would."Mother's always watching us, her eyes are X rays ". She's a monster , a mentally-ill person , a frustrated woman who hates mediocrity (represented by her meek husband's world which consists of his dog and his roses),who wants power and uses the others as puppets .
She's got everything to live a comfortable bourgeois life: her son and her son-in-law are both doctors .But a routine life does not satisfy her ,the coming of handsome Austin makes her even more destructive .
But it had begun before: a woman asking the vet to put a good old dog to sleep? A mother who warns her daughter against her husband? Who urges her maid to seduce her son-in-law by making her read "lady Chatterley's lover",a book forbidden in the UK till 1960 (an under-the- counter French edition : the novel was first tranferred to the screen by Yves Allégret in 1955 in this country ,but in a chaste way)?
Sylvia gets her kicks by destroying her family's life ; you should see her sweetly smile when she sees her "power" on the others .
This is first-rate film noir ; Sonia Dresdel's piercing eyes (when she watches her sick husband , they will give you the jitters)will haunt you after the viewing .Try to forget them!
Sylvia is even more terrifying than Harriet: if eyes could kill ,hers certainly would."Mother's always watching us, her eyes are X rays ". She's a monster , a mentally-ill person , a frustrated woman who hates mediocrity (represented by her meek husband's world which consists of his dog and his roses),who wants power and uses the others as puppets .
She's got everything to live a comfortable bourgeois life: her son and her son-in-law are both doctors .But a routine life does not satisfy her ,the coming of handsome Austin makes her even more destructive .
But it had begun before: a woman asking the vet to put a good old dog to sleep? A mother who warns her daughter against her husband? Who urges her maid to seduce her son-in-law by making her read "lady Chatterley's lover",a book forbidden in the UK till 1960 (an under-the- counter French edition : the novel was first tranferred to the screen by Yves Allégret in 1955 in this country ,but in a chaste way)?
Sylvia gets her kicks by destroying her family's life ; you should see her sweetly smile when she sees her "power" on the others .
This is first-rate film noir ; Sonia Dresdel's piercing eyes (when she watches her sick husband , they will give you the jitters)will haunt you after the viewing .Try to forget them!
Sonia Dresdel goes Joan Crawford in Queen Bee one better in This Was A Woman, a British film from 1948.
Dresdel was considered one of Britain's finest actresses, and there was widespread disappointment that she never played Lady Macbeth. That's just to give you a heads up of what's coming.
Dresdel plays the matriarch of a home, with a husband, a son, and a daughter. She does horrific things to all of them.
Her mild-mannered husband has prize roses- which she cuts and puts around the house. He has a beloved dog. The minute I saw him, I knew he was doomed. She doesn't like his barking and has him put down.
Her daughter is engaged to be married. Her mother brings a young maid into the house to give him slutty books, hoping she'll make a play for the fiancé.
Then she scares her daughter about sex so horribly that she won't even let her new husband kiss her. The maid starts looking pretty good.
Finally, she meets a successful friend of her husband and decides hubby has to go.
Outrageous. It's not like no one stands up to her, but they don't seem to hold a grudge. In the next scene, everything seems fine.
A tour de force for Dresdel. She's hateful. Must be seen to be believed.
Dresdel was considered one of Britain's finest actresses, and there was widespread disappointment that she never played Lady Macbeth. That's just to give you a heads up of what's coming.
Dresdel plays the matriarch of a home, with a husband, a son, and a daughter. She does horrific things to all of them.
Her mild-mannered husband has prize roses- which she cuts and puts around the house. He has a beloved dog. The minute I saw him, I knew he was doomed. She doesn't like his barking and has him put down.
Her daughter is engaged to be married. Her mother brings a young maid into the house to give him slutty books, hoping she'll make a play for the fiancé.
Then she scares her daughter about sex so horribly that she won't even let her new husband kiss her. The maid starts looking pretty good.
Finally, she meets a successful friend of her husband and decides hubby has to go.
Outrageous. It's not like no one stands up to her, but they don't seem to hold a grudge. In the next scene, everything seems fine.
A tour de force for Dresdel. She's hateful. Must be seen to be believed.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesCelia Lipton's debut.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt about 16:00 as Mrs. Russell is taking the dog to the vet, the shadows of the cameraman is at bottom left.
- Citações
Sylvia Russell: Fenella is not meant for marriage - she's too sensitive, too highly strung, hysterical almost. When she fell in love with you I hoped she'd alter. But if anything, marriage has intensified her abnormality.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe listing of the actors' names in the opening credits ends with "etc, etc".
- ConexõesReferenced in Ken Adam: Designing Bond (2000)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is This Was a Woman?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 42 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente