Noose for a Lady

Dennis Price once again plays detective in this entertaining murder mystery.He plays a relation of a murdered man who finds that the man's wife has been convicted of murder and is facing execution.He joins forces with the murdered man's stepdaughter to track down the real murderer.The problem is that the local poacher who saw the murderer creep away from the house is himself murdered.Then Charles Lloyd Pack who looks as if he has an important clue has a stoke and dies in hospital.So with time ticking away all the usual suspects are assembled together,and believe it or not they include Esme Cannon..I have to say that the identity of the murderer is cleverly disguised,I did not guess write and was put off the scent by some very effective red herrings.So although essential a supporting feature the cast writing and direction make this into a very effective low budget thriller.

Pamela Alan is to hang for murdering her husband. Cousin Dennis Price comes in from Uganda and proposes to find the real murderer with the help of Rona Anderson, Miss Alan's stepdaughter.

Wolf Rilla's first feature feature after toiling for a decade in the BBC's television division is a rather straightforward mystery in which Price proposes to prove that the British justice system has gotten it all wrong with the skeptical help of police sergeant George Merritt. This includes all the traditional appurtenances of such stories, including the scene where he gathers all the suspects together. He has little trouble accumulating two additional corpses and several people with some excellent motives and opportunities. This makes one wonder what the police and the defense had been doing.

Rilla handwaves this away, and deals with the endless talking and the help of Walter J. Harvey's gracefully moving camera. The result is a good, if unexceptional murder movie although I suspected the actual murderer about halfway through. There were enough decent red herrings to keep me in doubt until the revelation.

I saw this movie once as a child and it has always escaped me . For a long time i thought i just imagined it , that it never existed , then i saw it again some 20 years later . Its not a great film by any means but i think it attains classic status solely on the dialogue and filming techniques . I mean how can you not like a grainy black and white film with poor lighting and extreme closeups with dialogue like ."Ive called you all here because the killer is amongst you, here in this room " " the killer is...." then the light goes out and there is a shot ... and then ... well you will have to see this movie to find out how it ends.. its a classic.. If any one has seen ths recently please let me know...I will be forever in your debt....

A really neat little thriller, the story plays fair and the killer comes as a real surprise. The cast work well together and Dennis Price is a reliable lead as the solver of the crime. Well worth 90 minutes of your time.

This is a neat thriller. The acting is good, and what's more important is that it is 1953 and Capital Punishment is the focus of the film. It was good to show back then that there were innocent men and women being executed in this country. On the surface it does not attack the system, but in one essential way it does. If an innocent person is executed, then it puts to shame the whole concept of murder by state murder. Also 1953 was one of the most appalling years in UK judicial history. Homosexual men were rounded up as never before and imprisoned, and state execution was considered ' normal ' by most so-called decent people. It was a brave act to make this film and to make a basically indifferent public aware that the wrong person could be caught and hanged. The Craig/Bentley case posed many questions, but it took Ruth Ellis to realise that Capital Punishment was a crime in itself. In the more enlightened Sixties both Homosexuality and Capital punishment showed many in the public that new laws were needed and death by execution was abolished and homosexuality was partly decriminalised. This film was a step forward, and the anguish on the condemned woman's face speaks volumes. For this alone and her acting it is worth seeing, and to reflect on how much was wrong back in the Fifties. Wolf Rilla keeps the pace going, and all within one hour and sixteen minutes. Not great, but necessary.