Pedaços de uma Vida

I think some replies here were a little bit harsh on the movie. Mind you, this is a movie critic's haven, so I can understand. But let's try to level here.

First of all, I knew when starting this movie that it was going to be an indie, low-budget, sort of film, so I wasn't expecting some kind of Lord of The Rings or COlor Purple. I also knew not to expect anything too complex--in my experience with movies such as these, there is more there than just a simple, plausible plot that appeals to everybody. I knew going into it: Hey this is an Elijah Wood movie. Now everything I have seen him in, with the exception of Flipper, has been in some way great, and always told a great or complex story. Summing up all of those conclusions, I went into the movie knowing I shouldn't try to apply any other movie criticisms to it until I had seen it all the way through twice in order to fully catch the drift of the movie.

That being said, the movie was fair. I don't think it is the greatest thing he has ever done; it in no way compares to the Ice Storm or Lord of The Rings. However, I think the end of the movie sort of pulls everything together and helps me to see why Elijah might've chosen to do this movie.

Here is what I liked: The ending, the one that leaves everyone questioning a few things; the sarcastic kid, Billy, and his acerbic sence of humor; the thought processes of Barney Snow (Elijah Wood seems to have mastered the subtlety that is required for this role; Most people here complained that Barney was too apathetic for someone who knew nothing about his past or future, but I think it reflects some of Elijah's character in there too. At the end you see Elijah's happiness restored, when he is able to let go of everything (the very last scene), but throughout the movie it is quiet, subtle nuances; the introvert in Elijah shines through, and I think it is fantastic, and almsot mysterious.) I also liked Mazzo, I think he was a great actor in this movie, and the role worked well with him.

Here is what I disliked: The romantic scene with Rachel Leigh Cook when he finds out she is leaving for Europe...I think their chemistry is terrible, and I don't think the actors are to blame--I think the casting directors are to blame. EW and RLC can both be great, Elijah much more so than Rachel Leigh Cook, but I don't think they worked well together at all.

Suprisingly, I think he and Jordana Brewster from the Faculty had a better chemistry. Also, I think there was too little effort put into the love story. It was like...out of nowhere...they were in love...which is okay sometimes, as long as the characters' feelings are out in the open, but their feelings weren't out in the open. It made it seem strange that the cover of the video box was Elijah and RLC hugging; to me that wasn't the greater message of the movie. THe cover should have been Elijah as the central figure, and then, perhaps, the supporting characters behind him, sort of blended into the background.

Overall, I rate it an 10 for Elijah, Billy,and Mazzo. I rate it a 7 for Rachel Leigh Cook, and I rate a 5 for that silly romantic scene that just didn't flow well with the movie(though I rewound and rewound a few times there...). I give a 9 to the ending because I like enigmatic things but it didn't flow perfectly either. Overall, that's about an 8.

I took interest in this movie because I had purchased the book before I had even known there was a movie made of it. Movies are always different than the books, so I decided to stick with the book and read it to the end before I should rent the movie version. It took me a little while to get used to Robert Cormier's style of writing but once I got into the book, I couldn't put it down. After I got used to the style of writing, it was all I knew, wanted to know, and wanted to expect. I also couldn't put the book down because of the plot development and the story as a whole. But on a different note, let's forget the story line for a moment - I'd like to say that this book is wonderfully written. It just is. Cormier didn't just come up with a story and pull you through the book just to get to the point of it. The journey itself through each page is awesome. Barney is the most developed character because, even though it is third person, we go through his life along side him, we discover his thoughts and feelings - which I think Cormier did the most excellent job of writing in the book. Barney isn't some cheesy character. He has thoughts , feelings, and insecurities like real human beings have and just the way it is written really connected me to it and prompted introspection. At first I was really dissatisfied with the ending, thinking it was abrupt, but the more I thought about it, the way it ended (where it was at) was a good ending. It led us to assume the future without having Cormier tell us, which makes the book very good - because it makes US think about it days afterwards instead of having Cormier tell us "and that was that...the end."

Now the movie itself was OK. My opinion is most likely different from someone else's who has just seen the movie with no prior reading. The story in the movie is similar, but I don't like the way they went about converting the story into a movie. I knew first off that the movie could never be as good as the book (as most movies are) because it is unable to be as detailed and can't successfully develop Barney's character and definitely could not show us his thoughts. But what bothered me most about the movie was not only was it missing things, but it changed ideas around - almost as if the screenplay writer had confused ideas brought up in the book. There are too many for me to explain, though. Also, they could have cast more appropriate actors. I'll just show a few examples. Barney in the book was brown-eyed, bowlegged and insecure. Cassie was in her twenties, blond and blue eyed and was "out of Barney's league" considering the age difference and the situation of it all. Also, a major point made in the book was the difference between Mazzo and Barney. Mazzo was blond and beautiful. Even though his disease was apparant on his body, it never took away his handsomeness. Barney contemplated that Mazzo's beauty was going to waste, while, he, a not handsome, bowlegged boy was not ill and was going to live. A big change which I didn't like was with "the Handyman". He was a man in the book who is much less open and caring towards Barney which contributed to the atmosphere of the Complex and what Barney is going through. The movie softened it up for viewers having it be a caring women who keeps Barney's well-being in mind. I also think the director could have done better. For example, Billy the Kidney could barely walk when he was out of his wheel chair and everytime Barney talked to him, Billy had this look of pain in his eyes, which he never complained about the disease despite the fact he whined about everything else. In the movie he is different - once again, softened up. Also Allie Roon was very spastic constantly moving and stuttering. Allie in the movie was toned down version.

I can't say who would prefer the book or the movie. I prefer the book because it is much more complete, isn't afraid to tell you every detail or hide the darkness of the Complex. The movie has less of that and gives us a happier ending. Barney is very depleted in his life, but even the book can show you (in a much more complete way) he still strives for hopes and accomplishes dreams, which makes him all the more of a character to root for. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of what I am trying to say.

Read the book and see for yourself.

The Bumblebee Flies Anyway was certainly a drama. People die, sad things happen, and the viewer is blown away by the stunning storytelling. That's what it's supposed to be, right? And was it, in this case? Sort of. Major plot points came and went without much surprise from me. But I still found it interesting and entertaining. The title comes from the fact that bumblebees are actually too big for their wings, and shouldn't be able to fly, but they do. The acting was fine, but it's funny to see that Elijah Wood did better than Janeane Garofolo. The script was similarly passable. Soundtrack: Pretty good, and sometimes quite effective.

On the plus side, some awesome questions are asked, and that's what makes this so powerful. I can't go into detail without giving away the plot. Overall, it's not a waste of time, but there are probably better movies out there. I'd recommend it for people who like to ponder philosophically.

It was a flat movie that didn't take the opportunity to tell a very deep and emotional story. It was too short. However I love Elijah Wood in any movie, so that was a plus. He needs to learn how to kiss on film. I also liked Rachael Leigh Cook. A good match for Lij. Hope they do other movies together.

I really tried to like this movie because I really like some of the actors in it. But - it had so many flaws that any thinking person should have found it unwatchable.

This film is so full of confusing and implausible scenes and especially reactions that it's hard to accept almost any following scene without wondering what the heck had just happened. Or why it happened. And the cinematography was uneven. Some of the shots were nice, where others were shot so badly that I wondered if they had handed the camera to Forrest Gump himself.

Okay, to start, the Elijah Wood character is supposed to be stricken with amnesia, which would be profoundly disturbing and worrisome for any real person. Elijah does stress over this, randomly, now and again, in brief and obvious shots. But it's amazingly understated. That's just one example of how all the players under-react (or badly act) to every situation in Bumblebee.

As much as it tried to be different and, I guess, 'artsy', this film is as chock full of obtuse emotional manipulation as any mainstream, big budget, Hollywood piece of crap: feel sorry for the dying kids, understand the detached but not-really-detached doctor, ache for the long-shot romance, laugh with and love the funny kid, but worry about his health. Please.

The worst things about this terrible piece of work were the dialogue and the acting. I honestly don't think the actors are to be entirely blamed for their bad performances. There's only so much one can do with a botched script and bad directing. There are many moments when you feel like you're watching a teeny-bop romp (albeit, a depressing one) or a watch-by-numbers after school special.

It's all very confusing how the movie slaps scenes together which don't fit, and barely explains things which clearly need more definition.

The idea wasn't bad. It could have been an okay film, at least. But they screwed it up all the way through.

Thumbs (and other ligaments) down.