AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,4/10
2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA seemingly harmless telephone service endows an evil teacher with powers from beyond the grave.A seemingly harmless telephone service endows an evil teacher with powers from beyond the grave.A seemingly harmless telephone service endows an evil teacher with powers from beyond the grave.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Patrick O'Bryan
- Spike
- (as Pat O'Bryan)
Philip McKeon
- Taylor
- (as Phil McKeon)
George 'Buck' Flower
- Turrell
- (as Buck Flower)
Avaliações em destaque
This is a Darn Good Movie that I Would have never Expected to be so Good. I first got Interested in the Series upon Learning that the Guy who Plays the Infamous "Freddy" Directed Part One. I Was looking to rent the Original, but could only found the Sequel, and was left with no other Choice. I didn't Expect Much, and got much more than I Would have ever Thought.
What Makes this Movie such a Masterpiece is really hard to put into Words. I would say it is mostly the Originality and the Obvious effort put into the Script to try to do the best with a VERY low budget. In Addition; Very good Acting, Good Video and Sound Quality, Good Murders, and a Remarkable Sense of Suspense.
Why would someone Not like this movie? They lack a sense of love for Horror Movies and/or Put this Movie in with a bad Attitude (If you Say You'll Hate this Movie, you most Likely will). I can also say that This Movie is for a Certain group that not everyone is in, and other user comments prove this! Reading the Plot Summary and Viewing the Trailer should really help you Decide before renting.
I give this Film 10 out of 10.
People who enjoyed this movie might like: Puppet Master, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Friday the 13th, Child's Play, Scream 2, The Dead Next Door, Bloody Murder, Phantasm, The Dead hate the Living, Castle Freak, Bad Channels, House and Haunted Hill, and I Know what you did last summer. For more Recommendations, Check the other Movies I Have commented on by Clicking on my Name above this Comment Section.
What Makes this Movie such a Masterpiece is really hard to put into Words. I would say it is mostly the Originality and the Obvious effort put into the Script to try to do the best with a VERY low budget. In Addition; Very good Acting, Good Video and Sound Quality, Good Murders, and a Remarkable Sense of Suspense.
Why would someone Not like this movie? They lack a sense of love for Horror Movies and/or Put this Movie in with a bad Attitude (If you Say You'll Hate this Movie, you most Likely will). I can also say that This Movie is for a Certain group that not everyone is in, and other user comments prove this! Reading the Plot Summary and Viewing the Trailer should really help you Decide before renting.
I give this Film 10 out of 10.
People who enjoyed this movie might like: Puppet Master, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Friday the 13th, Child's Play, Scream 2, The Dead Next Door, Bloody Murder, Phantasm, The Dead hate the Living, Castle Freak, Bad Channels, House and Haunted Hill, and I Know what you did last summer. For more Recommendations, Check the other Movies I Have commented on by Clicking on my Name above this Comment Section.
I believe, we did not. The first part of this movie was far not very good (What do you expect of a film directed by Freddy Krueger?). But this is one of the worst horror movies I have ever seen. Rene Assa (Who is this?) gives the worst performance of a college chief, who fell in love with one of his pupils, then he started dialing this number 976-EVIL, and than started performing assorted Omen-like murders. This poor girl (pupil) stands his evil powers with (guess who?) Spike, an annoying biker who participated in the first part too. Special F/X are poor, the acting is horrible, directing by Jim Wynorski (that genius whose mind brought us "Ghoulies IV" a movie which is in no way better). I didn't see any point in the script, it seems to rely solely on cheap special effects and some disgusting dead scenes. This movie sucks!
This sequel has the survivor from the first tracking down a serial killer who is apparently using the 976-evil line to gain demonic powers. The thing is with this story is he isn't really becoming demonic as the character in the first film was. Yeah he shows signs of it but it isn't the same kind of way. More or less he uses astral projection. Almost a different story with the 976-Evil name on it. For straight to video it isn't bad really. Its true claim to fame for horror fans is one scene that steals the movie.That being one of the characters is zapped into the TV and is put into a situation that begins as Its a Wonderful Life and turns into Night of the Living Dead. Such a clever combination and it works so well. Its an idea that's good and executed well but belongs in a better movie. Other than that you have a few car explosions and people being ran over and a few death scenes. Also has a fairly interesting ending which especially at that time you didn't see a lot. Acting wise its your standard low budget actors and nobody is really "phoning " it in. There are also a couple of cameos and a sign to a play that most horror fans will get and understand. So its not great but its not bad either. The wonder life/living dead scene is a show stealer but the movie is average at best.
Horror sequels are a curious breed. Often, they struggle to capture the essence of what made their predecessors successful, or they amplify the wrong elements in a misguided attempt to outdo the original. "976-Evil II" (1991) is one such film-a movie that exists in the shadow of its predecessor but ends up being a fascinatingly chaotic and campy ride. Directed by Jim Wynorski, a prolific filmmaker known for his exploitation films, this sequel dials into a horror subgenre that revels in its own absurdity, delivering a mixed bag of supernatural thrills, low-budget effects, and unintentional comedy.
Plot Overview
"976-Evil II" follows the cursed phone line concept from the original film but takes it in an entirely different, and somewhat nonsensical, direction. The story centers around Robin (Debbie James), a college student who starts experiencing terrifying visions after answering a call from the demonic hotline. Enter Grubeck (Rene Assa), a sadistic college dean who gains the ability to astral project and commit murders thanks to the satanic power of the 976-evil hotline. As Robin teams up with Spike (Patrick O'Bryan), a returning character from the first film, they must confront Grubeck's ghostly rampage before he completes his sinister plans.
Aesthetics and Direction: Wynorski's direction is a testament to the "more is more" philosophy that dominated low-budget horror in the early 90s. The film is a hodgepodge of horror tropes, from possession and slasher elements to outlandish supernatural occurrences. The effects are a particular highlight (or lowlight, depending on your perspective)-with Grubeck's ability to astral project leading to a series of bizarre death scenes that feel more like a fever dream than a cohesive narrative.
One particularly memorable scene involves a victim being trapped inside a television, forced to live through a warped version of "It's a Wonderful Life" that ends in her brutal demise. It's moments like these where the film's absurdity reaches a peak, offering a glimpse into the kind of surreal horror that can only come from a director unafraid to push the boundaries of good taste.
Visually, "976-Evil II" is drenched in neon lighting, fog machines, and quick cuts, creating a disorienting atmosphere that mirrors the disjointed nature of the plot.
**Performances:** The acting in "976-Evil II" is a mixed bag, with some performances adding to the film's campy charm while others fall flat. Rene Assa as Grubeck chews the scenery with relish, delivering lines with a menacing glee that makes his character's descent into madness all the more entertaining. His performance is one of the film's saving graces, providing a villain who is both ridiculous and genuinely unsettling.
Debbie James, as the film's final girl, brings a certain vulnerability to Robin, though her character is often overshadowed by the over-the-top events surrounding her. Patrick O'Bryan reprises his role as Spike, but his character feels more like a plot device than a fully fleshed-out protagonist. He's the link to the original film, yet he spends most of the movie reacting to the insanity around him rather than driving the plot forward.
The tone is where the movie truly sets itself apart from its predecessor. While the original "976-Evil" (1988), directed by Robert Englund of Freddy Krueger fame, had a darker and more serious approach to its horror, the sequel veers into outright camp. This shift in tone makes "976-Evil II" feel less like a continuation and more like a parody of the original. The film's blend of horror and humor doesn't always work, leading to moments that are more confusing than scary. However, for fans of B-movies, this tonal inconsistency can be part of the film's appeal.
Cultural Impact and Legacy: In the grand scheme of horror cinema, "976-Evil II" is a footnote-an oddity that's more likely to be found in a midnight movie marathon than in any serious discussion of the genre. Yet, it's precisely this obscurity that gives the film its cult status. Like many low-budget horror sequels of its time, "976-Evil II" appeals to a niche audience who revel in its absurdity, its flaws, and its unapologetic embrace of the ridiculous.
The film also serves as a reminder of the creative risks taken by directors like Wynorski, who were willing to push the boundaries of what horror could be, even if the results were often more laughable than terrifying. In a way, "976-Evil II" is a celebration of the excesses of early 90s horror, a time when filmmakers were experimenting with new ideas, technologies, and ways to shock audiences-no matter how bizarre the outcome.
Conclusion: "976-Evil II" is not a good film by traditional standards. It's poorly paced, questionably acted, and the plot is a disjointed mess. But that's exactly what makes it such a fascinating watch. For fans of schlocky, so-bad-it's-good cinema, this sequel offers a treasure trove of outrageous moments and unintentional comedy that's hard to find in today's more polished horror fare.
If you're looking for a coherent, genuinely scary movie, "976-Evil II" will disappoint. But if you're in the mood for a surreal, campy trip through the wild world of early 90s horror, this film might just be your perfect midnight dial-in. Whether you love it or hate it, "976-Evil II" is a film that demands to be seen-if only to be believed.
Plot Overview
"976-Evil II" follows the cursed phone line concept from the original film but takes it in an entirely different, and somewhat nonsensical, direction. The story centers around Robin (Debbie James), a college student who starts experiencing terrifying visions after answering a call from the demonic hotline. Enter Grubeck (Rene Assa), a sadistic college dean who gains the ability to astral project and commit murders thanks to the satanic power of the 976-evil hotline. As Robin teams up with Spike (Patrick O'Bryan), a returning character from the first film, they must confront Grubeck's ghostly rampage before he completes his sinister plans.
Aesthetics and Direction: Wynorski's direction is a testament to the "more is more" philosophy that dominated low-budget horror in the early 90s. The film is a hodgepodge of horror tropes, from possession and slasher elements to outlandish supernatural occurrences. The effects are a particular highlight (or lowlight, depending on your perspective)-with Grubeck's ability to astral project leading to a series of bizarre death scenes that feel more like a fever dream than a cohesive narrative.
One particularly memorable scene involves a victim being trapped inside a television, forced to live through a warped version of "It's a Wonderful Life" that ends in her brutal demise. It's moments like these where the film's absurdity reaches a peak, offering a glimpse into the kind of surreal horror that can only come from a director unafraid to push the boundaries of good taste.
Visually, "976-Evil II" is drenched in neon lighting, fog machines, and quick cuts, creating a disorienting atmosphere that mirrors the disjointed nature of the plot.
**Performances:** The acting in "976-Evil II" is a mixed bag, with some performances adding to the film's campy charm while others fall flat. Rene Assa as Grubeck chews the scenery with relish, delivering lines with a menacing glee that makes his character's descent into madness all the more entertaining. His performance is one of the film's saving graces, providing a villain who is both ridiculous and genuinely unsettling.
Debbie James, as the film's final girl, brings a certain vulnerability to Robin, though her character is often overshadowed by the over-the-top events surrounding her. Patrick O'Bryan reprises his role as Spike, but his character feels more like a plot device than a fully fleshed-out protagonist. He's the link to the original film, yet he spends most of the movie reacting to the insanity around him rather than driving the plot forward.
The tone is where the movie truly sets itself apart from its predecessor. While the original "976-Evil" (1988), directed by Robert Englund of Freddy Krueger fame, had a darker and more serious approach to its horror, the sequel veers into outright camp. This shift in tone makes "976-Evil II" feel less like a continuation and more like a parody of the original. The film's blend of horror and humor doesn't always work, leading to moments that are more confusing than scary. However, for fans of B-movies, this tonal inconsistency can be part of the film's appeal.
Cultural Impact and Legacy: In the grand scheme of horror cinema, "976-Evil II" is a footnote-an oddity that's more likely to be found in a midnight movie marathon than in any serious discussion of the genre. Yet, it's precisely this obscurity that gives the film its cult status. Like many low-budget horror sequels of its time, "976-Evil II" appeals to a niche audience who revel in its absurdity, its flaws, and its unapologetic embrace of the ridiculous.
The film also serves as a reminder of the creative risks taken by directors like Wynorski, who were willing to push the boundaries of what horror could be, even if the results were often more laughable than terrifying. In a way, "976-Evil II" is a celebration of the excesses of early 90s horror, a time when filmmakers were experimenting with new ideas, technologies, and ways to shock audiences-no matter how bizarre the outcome.
Conclusion: "976-Evil II" is not a good film by traditional standards. It's poorly paced, questionably acted, and the plot is a disjointed mess. But that's exactly what makes it such a fascinating watch. For fans of schlocky, so-bad-it's-good cinema, this sequel offers a treasure trove of outrageous moments and unintentional comedy that's hard to find in today's more polished horror fare.
If you're looking for a coherent, genuinely scary movie, "976-Evil II" will disappoint. But if you're in the mood for a surreal, campy trip through the wild world of early 90s horror, this film might just be your perfect midnight dial-in. Whether you love it or hate it, "976-Evil II" is a film that demands to be seen-if only to be believed.
Slightly better sequel finds that evil telephone line still in business. It seduces a teacher at first and then turns him into a full blooded killer. Lots of grisly memorable death scenes and a wicked twist of an ending are what make this entry better. Sure it is rather poorly done, but this film is a lot of fun and moves along at a nice pace. Rated R.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesBrigette Nielsen was cast after she met director Jim Wynorski at a party. At the party, the two of them played a round of pool together with a wager: if Nielsen won, Jim would "put on a maid's outfit and clean her house" but if Wynorski won, Nielsen would work on the film for one day.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen the truck Grubeck steals to chase after Spike is shown pulling out of the impound lot of the police station the rear shutter of the trailer is open. During the chase itself several shots show the shutter is now closed most likely to hide the pyrotechnics loaded into the trailer for the impending explosion at the end of the chase.
- Citações
Zuzu Bailey: Look, Daddy! Every time you hear a bell, a zombie takes a soul to hell.
- ConexõesEdited into Ghoulies IV: Eles Estão Próximos (1994)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is 976-Evil II?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Força Demoníaca: Linha Direta para o Inferno II
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 33 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Força Demoníaca 2 (1991) officially released in India in English?
Responda