Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Estão Mortos
Título original: Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead
Dois personagens secundários da peça 'Hamlet' tropeçam, desconhecendo suas vidas planejadas e incapazes de se desviar delas.Dois personagens secundários da peça 'Hamlet' tropeçam, desconhecendo suas vidas planejadas e incapazes de se desviar delas.Dois personagens secundários da peça 'Hamlet' tropeçam, desconhecendo suas vidas planejadas e incapazes de se desviar delas.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 3 vitórias e 2 indicações no total
Serge Soric
- Tragedian
- (as Srdjan Soric)
Sven Medvesek
- Laertes
- (as Sven Medvesck)
Avaliações em destaque
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead was one of my favourite films whilst growing up. The movie follows two irrelevant characters (irrelevant in that although they served a significant purpose, their characters were not developed in any depth... Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, as individuals, were relatively unimportant) through one of the most renowned stories ever told (Hamlet). It is a film about two characters that are completely unaware of the magnitude of the events taking place around them. This carries on throughout the entire film, and is also evidenced in their accidental discoveries of significant historical scientific findings (such as the steam engine or the concept of gravity). The characters stumble their way through the film, unaware of the consequences to their actions or their significance or importance.
The characters spend the entire film coming to terms with their existence. Shakespeare didn't provide any detailed character development of either Rosencrantz or Guildenstern, and as such, they are left confused as to the purpose of their own existence.
The film also looks at the concept of a predetermined destiny. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern's fate is already determined before the film begins. And although they play an important role in one of the greatest stories ever told, they are completely unaware of their destiny; they are merely victims of circumstance.
I should also note that the constant banter between the two characters (specifically in their 'Game of Questions') is pure quality.
The characters spend the entire film coming to terms with their existence. Shakespeare didn't provide any detailed character development of either Rosencrantz or Guildenstern, and as such, they are left confused as to the purpose of their own existence.
The film also looks at the concept of a predetermined destiny. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern's fate is already determined before the film begins. And although they play an important role in one of the greatest stories ever told, they are completely unaware of their destiny; they are merely victims of circumstance.
I should also note that the constant banter between the two characters (specifically in their 'Game of Questions') is pure quality.
So I was sitting around watching TV on a Sunday afternoon... or
trying too, anyway. Tragically there was nothing on... until my eye
caught a title; Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. My inner- geek answered "well duh. Read the play didn't I?" Of course my
inner geek is also curious as anything, so my geek and I turned
the channel sat back and watched as two befuddled, goofy
Shakespearian hooligans find themselves in Elsinor home of their
loony friend Hamlet. Now don't get me wrong, the dialogue goes
about 90 miles per hour, but the topics are Kevin Smith-like in their
randomness and the relationship between these two classic
characters also remind me of one Kevin would write. What's more the only way to know which is Rosencrantz and which
is Guildenstern is to look on the credits. Even they sometimes
aren't sure who's who. This movie is lightning fast and painfully
clever, definitely not for the faint of heart or head, but if you've got it
in you I *highly* recommend it.
trying too, anyway. Tragically there was nothing on... until my eye
caught a title; Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. My inner- geek answered "well duh. Read the play didn't I?" Of course my
inner geek is also curious as anything, so my geek and I turned
the channel sat back and watched as two befuddled, goofy
Shakespearian hooligans find themselves in Elsinor home of their
loony friend Hamlet. Now don't get me wrong, the dialogue goes
about 90 miles per hour, but the topics are Kevin Smith-like in their
randomness and the relationship between these two classic
characters also remind me of one Kevin would write. What's more the only way to know which is Rosencrantz and which
is Guildenstern is to look on the credits. Even they sometimes
aren't sure who's who. This movie is lightning fast and painfully
clever, definitely not for the faint of heart or head, but if you've got it
in you I *highly* recommend it.
I love this movie. I remember first watching it in a college class talking about different takes, different points of view. Watching it again now and I find myself liking it even more. It's such an interesting film with an anti-narrative and such a wonderfully, deliberately bizarre structure. Rose & Guild follows the story of our titular characters but it's really more about what they're doing off to the side of the main story of Hamlet. So much so that they just randomly show up in places when the story demands it and they don't even know how they got there.
It's weird and it absolutely isn't going to work for some people but I love this one. It's so unique and fun, creative and inventive and I try to give props to any movie setting out to be as different as this one especially when it actually succeeds at what it's trying to do. Strong recommend here, whether you're familiar with Hamlet or not, though a loose understanding of the play would likely be beneficial.
It's weird and it absolutely isn't going to work for some people but I love this one. It's so unique and fun, creative and inventive and I try to give props to any movie setting out to be as different as this one especially when it actually succeeds at what it's trying to do. Strong recommend here, whether you're familiar with Hamlet or not, though a loose understanding of the play would likely be beneficial.
This clever screenplay by Tom Stoppard challenges the viewer to listen and watch closely as the Shakespeare tragedy Hamlet is turned on its ear via taking the perspective of the oblivious rhetorics, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. There are multiple 'plot within plot' twists which intersect and skew at will, sometimes creating a surreal experience for the observer. The script is brilliant, full of double-entendres and mixed reactions executed superbly by Tim Roth and Gary Oldman, along with a solid supporting cast (including American actor Richard Dreyfus). Stoppard felt that the title characters, messengers in the original play, were under represented and so examines their possible perspectives in the tale by way of exploring their destiny and their lack-of-awareness of it. Stunning and hilarious wordplay with excellent repartee between Oldman and Roth. Refreshing and creative spin of the tale of Denmark's 'melancholy prince'.
A wonderfully witty film masterfully transferred from a marvellous stage script to the screen.
The dialogue is constant and highly entertaining, the meshing of Stoppard's modern day speech of the original parts of the story and Shakespeare's original Hamlet practically seamless and masterfully worked.
Gary Oldman gives a superb performance as Guildernstern (or is it Rosencratz - and, at the end of the day, does it matter?) outstanding in a fabulous cast. All in all this film cannot be recommended highly enough.
The dialogue is constant and highly entertaining, the meshing of Stoppard's modern day speech of the original parts of the story and Shakespeare's original Hamlet practically seamless and masterfully worked.
Gary Oldman gives a superb performance as Guildernstern (or is it Rosencratz - and, at the end of the day, does it matter?) outstanding in a fabulous cast. All in all this film cannot be recommended highly enough.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesOriginally, the two leads (who appropriately spend the movie mixing up their own names) were cast the other way around.
- Erros de gravaçãoThroughout the movie there are scenes where day suddenly changes to night and vice versa. This is a running gag of Tom Stoppard plays which often have "time jumps" written into the stage directions.
- Citações
Rosencrantz: Do you think Death could possibly be a boat?
Guildenstern: No, no, no... Death is "not." Death isn't. Take my meaning? Death is the ultimate negative. Not-being. You can't not be on a boat.
Rosencrantz: I've frequently not been on boats.
Guildenstern: No, no... What you've been is not on boats.
- ConexõesEdited into Spisok korabley (2008)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Rosencrantz y Guildenstern han muerto
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 739.104
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 24.004
- 10 de fev. de 1991
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 739.104
- Tempo de duração1 hora 57 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Estão Mortos (1990)?
Responda