A Mulher que Soube Amar

This film contains a surprisingly high level of violence; in particular the kidnapping scene where the boy's grandmother is beaten up. Even nowadays when gory violence seems to be the norm, it mainly happens to men and I think most film producers would hesitate before depicting a helpless old lady being beaten senseless in prolonged and graphic detail, in this case made more realistic and believable by good acting from Barbara Mullen. The same thug who beat her is later arrested in his bedroom by the police sending in a dog followed by three heavies who give him a savage beating before driving him to the station where he is threatened with more unless he gives the location of the boy. Whether her acting is good or bad the producers probably wanted Jayne Mansfield as added glamour which she provides by looking stunning particularly towards the end when she sings in her club. Overall this is an exciting and entertaining thriller.

There are many really good British noir films that exploit the seediness of post-war London, set around Soho and involving realistic underground criminality and making very watchable drama out of 1950's London low-life.

But this isn't that kind of film.

For some reason, the producers decided to make a Hollywood type noir - ignoring the excellent genre work done by other British producers and creating a totally unbelievable poor-mans version of a movie that should have had Bogart and Raft in it but instead had a collection of totally out-of-place British actors - and - Jayne Mansfield.

Mansfield whispers - Marilyn Monroe style - her way through the part and it is obvious that her attempt at a sultry voice has to be overdubbed for many of her scenes. The rest of the cast try their best to be American gangsters (at one point Anthony Quayle actually calls somebody a "dirty-rat") and betray their true acting ability in a poor attempt to be something they aren't.

The cinematography is good - lots of moody lighting, clever angles and the direction is sharp, closely cut with some good set scenes. But you always feel that this is a British attempt at making a film that is totally un-British.

The film gets better as it progresses as the story takes over and Quayle's excellent performance lifts the film out of its misery into something that is finally worth watching. But you always feel that Quayle is on a damage reduction exercise trying his best to rescue the awful script and Mansfield's execrable acting and try and create something worthwhile. Regrettably, the forces of mediocrity win out.

It is sometimes said that the age of film noir was over by the end of the fifties; Orson Welles's "Touch of Evil" from 1958 is sometimes regarded as marking the end of the line. This may be true of America, the genre's original home, but in Britain noir survived into the sixties. This may be because we were slower than America to adopt colour television, meaning that there was still a market for black-and-white films here. "The Challenge" from 1960 is an example of later British noir. (In America it was shown as "It Takes a Thief", but I will use the original British title).

Jim Maxton, a lorry driver and petty criminal, is persuaded by his gang leader lover Billy to take part in a big robbery. (And no, this isn't a rare example of a film from the early sixties with a gay theme. Although the cast-list spells her name as "Billy" rather than "Billie", she is a woman). He is betrayed to the police, arrested, convicted and sentenced to eight years in jail, of which he serves five, while the rest of the gang remain at liberty. Upon release, Maxton tries to go straight and resumes his career as a lorry driver, but it turns out that he is the only one of the gang who knows where the loot from the robbery is buried. In an attempt to force him to reveal its whereabouts, his former partners in crime kidnap his young son Joey and threaten the boy's life.

Contrary to what one reviewer states, Jayne Mansfield was not a starlet at the start of her career when she made this film. Her career as a Hollywood leading lady was a relatively short one, largely because she was seen as a sort of poor man's Marilyn Monroe. She was not without acting talent, but producers preferred to cast her in undemanding roles in light comedies which showcased her voluptuous figure. (Something similar happened with Diana Dors in Britain). By 1960 her popularity in America was waning, and she tried to reinvent herself in Europe. This was her only British film, but she was also to appear in Italian, German and Greek ones.

Mansfield is not particularly convincing as a female London gang boss, especially as her accent seems stuck halfway across the Atlantic, and we are never sure whether Billy is supposed to be completely ruthless or whether she is partly redeemed by a softer side to her nature. There are better performances from the actors playing two other members of the gang, Carl Möhner as Kristy and Peter Reynolds as Buddy. Kristy, who definitely has no softer side to his nature, is Maxton's rival for Billy's affections and probably the man who informed on Maxton to the police. As for Buddy he is not so much ruthless as psychopathic; he has responsibility for guarding the kidnapped Joey and devises a sadistic scheme to bring about the boy's death and make it look like an accident.

The best acting, however, comes from Anthony Quayle as Maxton. Quayle was a leading light in the British theatre, both as actor and director, but never had quite the same success in the cinema, possibly because (unlike, say, Olivier or Burton) he never really had the looks to be a matinee idol. Most of his films were British- he never attempted to conquer Hollywood- and he mostly appeared in supporting roles. In "The Challenge", however, he had a chance to play a leading role, and made the most of it. His Maxton, despite his criminal past, is a man with a certain decency, far more so than the other members of his gang, and the nearest thing the film has to a hero. In some ways the film is a standard crime thriller, but Quayle's performance, together with a well-written script and a suspenseful ending, is the main reason why it deserves an above-average mark. 6/10.

When you watch a British crime film from the 1950s you expect that the gang boss will be played by Herbert Lom,or Martin Benson or maybe Eric Pohlman,but Jayne Mansfield!\whereas Joan Crawford is a tigress when she is a gang boss,Eg Johnny Notorious,Mansfield is a pussycat.She has all the toughness of a rotten tomato.Once the going gets tough she gets going and Carl Mohne takes over.The best she can do is simper in a variety of wigs and a different outfit for every scene.She simpers a song in a sort of Monroe imitation.She is in short dreadful.Quayle plays against type as her crook lover who went to prison but kept the loot.If you were to take Monroe out of this film you would have a good film.Nevertheless when Mansfield is off the screen the film is quite entertaining.

The setup for "It Takes A Thief" really doesn't make a lot of sense--and that is a huge problem. It begins with Jim (Anthony Quayle) falling for Billy (Jayne Mansfield). He doesn't realize that Billy is a cold and calculating sort--and she is setting him up. She convinces him to join in on a heist and he agrees. Now here is the part that makes no sense at all--Jim is responsible for hiding the money and then someone in the gang lets the cops know he was in on the crime and he's sent to prison. Why turn Jim in to the police? Jim would either return the money to the authorities OR he'd sit on it until after he's out of prison--and that could be years. It simply makes little sense. And for some time you aren't sure if Billy did this or perhaps Kristy--the brooding gang member who appears to have an extremely close relationship with Billy.

Regardless, several years pass and Jim has now done his time--and the money is still hidden. He has no intention of returning to his life of crime--even though the old gang is pressuring him to do so because they want the loot. When he refuses to cooperate with them, the gang turns up the pressure by kidnapping Jim's son. At the same time, the police are keeping an eye on Jim because they, too, want the money as well. With all this pressure on him, what is he to do?

Aside from a main plot idea that makes little sense, "It Takes a Thief" has several other things working against it. The big one is the odd casting of Mansfield considering the film is set in England. Plus, the pairing of the distinguished actor, Anthony Quayle with Jayne Mansfield is just plain weird. Finally, the DVD print is pretty bad--making the viewing experience less than stellar. It's really sad because apart from the weird casting strange plot about Jim being turned it, it's a very good noir sort of film. The film has a lot of tension and the scenes involving the search for the kid late in the film were awfully good.