Das Ungeheuer von London-City

THE MONSTER OF LONDON CITY is another Wallace story idea from Wallace Jr. Unlike THE MAD EXECUTIONERS, the previous film in this series of Edgar Wallace-inspired krimis, the results this time are less than satisfying. The fourth film in the collection TERROR IN THE FOG: THE WALLACE KRIMIS AT CCC disappoints in more than one way. Ironically, the failure can be attributed to a lack of Englishness.

The Wallace krimis (that's German for "crime films") stand or fall by the believability factor-the degree to which they suspend belief that they are, in actuality, taking place in England. This is a curious starting point for a West German production, especially when the actors speak German, but when English murder mystery culture blends with Teutonic melodrama, the result can be a lot of fun. Here, it just doesn't work, possibly because Jack the Ripper (upon which this film is based) is too sordid a subject matter to take lightly.

There is nothing more "English" in the world of crime than the Jack the Ripper story. Perhaps the problem with THE MONSTER OF LONDON CITY is it attempts to tell the tale by making the victims very beautiful young women, which is a bit like sweetening the gruesome facts (bloody murders), with confection sugar (eye candy). This approach just didn't work for me.

One item of interest, German actress Marianne Koch, who portrays one of the principal roles, soon after filming her part went to work with director Sergio Leone, paired with a young American actor named Clint Eastwood, then on the cusp of major cinematic stardom, in the first "Dollar" film, FISTFUL OF DOLLARS. Koch, like Eastwood, has been blessed with longevity and is still active at age 93. Maybe they should team up again and call it SPOONFUL OF GERITOL?

THE MONSTER OF LONDON CITY's idea of focusing on an actor portraying Jack the Ripper while simultaneously the actual Ripper murders were taking place, has its basis in reality. At the time of the Ripper murders in London in 1888 a young German-born, English/American actor named Richard Mansfield was taking the London theatre world by storm with his performance as Jekyll/Hyde. His performance was so convincing he was for a time considered by the investigating authorities to be an actual suspect! Now that sounds like something Edgar Wallace might have dreamed up!

THE MONSTER OF LONDON CITY isn't a bad film it just doesn't quite ring true no matter how many shots of Big Ben are included.

"Big Ben." "Ring true." Get it?

Never mind. You be the judge.

The idea for this film isn't bad, but somehow when it all came together the whole thing was a bit dull and I had a very hard time sticking with it. This is a German film dubbed into English and I wonder if perhaps it might have played better in its original form. Regardless, I couldn't wait for it to end.

The story is set in 1960s London and a series of Jack the Ripper style have been occurring. At the same time, there's a play about the Ripper playing to huge crowds in the city and after a while it appears that the two might be related.

The problem I had is that the characters weren't that interesting and the mystery wasn't all that hard to predict. On top of that, things were made a bit worse by a horrible musical track made by a cheesy theater organ. Overall, you could do a lot better.

Pretty sure this is my first German 'krimi' and am rather surprised how much I enjoyed it. Said by some to be a precursor to the Italian giallo, I can now see why. Not only is there a silly/comic element but the actual kills are uncompromising with extensive use of force reducing victims to 'rag doll' like state and complete with body dragging and carrying sequences. My copy is dated 1964 and in some respects this looks earlier, being shot in b/w and featuring foggy streets (Hamburg standing in for London), complete with cobbles sparkling in their wetness. Also referencing back to the earliest German expressionist horror with curved brick walls extreme angles and long dark shadows creeping across the victim before the attack. In other ways the film strikes as later because 1964 would seem early to see such casual and concentrated violence and incidental sexuality. Very interesting and enjoyable watch.

I have seen most, but not all, of the German Edgar Wallace thrillers of the 60s. They do vary in quality, but when "on target" the filmmakers behind this peculiar franchise had a wonderful thing going. At their best these "krimis" (German equivalent of the Italian giallo) possess a unique flavor and style. They are dark and atmospheric, most activity seems to take place at night (or at least it should). Great advantage is taken of the opportunity to use the moody lighting of London at night, and these films do very well when the narrative allows for many scenes in seedy pubs, run down hotels, smoky nightclubs, Gothic mansions and the like. Characters tend to be exaggerated and grotesque, especially the villains. The violence is intense and shocking, and thankfully this welcomed potency is accomplished without the use of copious amounts of gore. One of the highlights of the franchise is the music. The scores are always noteworthy, either due to being outlandish and bizarre (avant garde and atonal), or more traditional but still overtly evocative and compelling. During the 1960s film composers in both Germany and Italy were riding a crest of supreme creativity, self-expression, and experimentation. In no films is this fantastic artistic freedom more evident than in the Edgar Wallace thrillers. The Monster of London City was scored by Martin Bottcher (pronounced "bett-ker"). Bottcher is a very well known and beloved musician in Germany, particularly to film fans (he is deeply affiliated with the German westerns of the 60s). His style is extremely smooth and elegant, usually relying on rich melodies and simple but emphatic designs. For those versed in the world of film music it will help to offer that his work is comparable to that of John Barry, Henry Mancini and Neal Hefti. Bottcher's main theme for The Monster of London City is typical of his service to the genre; it is a slinky and sensual jazz-infused instrumental. The melody is not complex, but nonetheless bold and effectively communicative of sex, sleaze and sin - three prime ingredients of any solid German-filmed Wallace mystery! As for the narrative, this is a good one. The story concerns a reincarnation of Jack the Ripper terrorizing the denizens of the London after-hours crowd, and the principles involved are an actor (coincidentally starring as the Ripper in a play that benefits from the publicity generated by the real-life murders), a stuffy politician and his beautiful niece (Marienne Koch of A Fistful of Dollars), her lover, and a bumbling detective. The story moves at steady clip and the desired ambiance of decadence and cosmopolitan glamor is thick and juicy. If you have a taste for such things you'll love it! - John Bender

The 'Krimi' genre is mostly made up of films based on stories by novelist Edgar Wallace and many of the best of them were directed by the prolific Alfred Vohrer. The Monster of London City does not benefit from the input of either of these two genre luminaries and is undoubtedly one of the weaker films of its type out there. As mentioned, the film is not based on a novel by Edgar Wallace; but it does boast perhaps the next best thing as the story used for this film was penned by none other than Wallace's son, Bryan Edgar Wallace. Like many films of this type, the story takes influence from the murders committed by Jack the Ripper and we focus on a stage play about the serial killer. Unfortunately, someone has taken it upon themselves to begin copying The Ripper and is murdering girls throughout London. Naturally this means that a harrowing eye is cast upon the play; and the lead actor soon becomes the chief suspect in the investigation carried out by the London police.

Naturally the film is set in London; and director Edwin Zbonek does a good job of capturing the fog drenched streets which help to give the film a thick and foreboding atmosphere. It's often the style that I like most about these films; and while this one is not so heavy on the style as some other films in this genre; the style is once again the best thing about it. The cast list does not include any well known actors; although as an ensemble there is nothing wrong with the performances. The story is the biggest let-down, however, as while there are certainly opportunities for a good, strong thriller here; it unfortunately falls somewhat short of the potential. There is very little in the way of suspense and therefore it is easy to get rather bored with the investigation. Naturally the murders are not very grisly; but they're not really memorable either and this also harms the film. The ending is a particular disappointment and can be seen coming a mile away. Overall, this film might be worth a look if you're a big Krimi fan, but I wouldn't bother with it otherwise.