Rômulo & Remo

Steve Reeves was the "god" of these sandal-and-spear movies and Gordon Scott the "demi-god," and here you have them together playing brothers in one of the best examples of the genre. Plus Virna Lisi! In telling the tale of Romulus and Remus, this manages to include one of filmdom's odder whipping sequences. Steve Reeves is spreadeagled to a vertical frame which is rapidly rotated by one man while another man goes at Steve's chest with a whip. Curiously, though the whipper goes at his work with a vengeance, at the end of the sequence, Steve only has about 4 welts on his skin!

One of these days, I hope, we'll see a serious re-evaluation of the so-called sword & sandal genre of historical/mythic epics produced in Italy in the 1950s and '60s. When seen in ideal circumstances—excellent prints in the original widescreen formats—the best examples of the genre are quite impressive. DUEL OF THE TITANS (ROMOLO E REMO) is one of the best, and it's magnificent.

This is not a muscleman fantasy with superhuman feats of strength, like HERCULES, but a serious retelling of the foundation myth of Rome. Various elements of the Romulus and Remus story are freely but intelligently reinterpreted, the sets and costumes have a convincing Iron Age look, and the larger-than-life characters of the legendary Twins are strongly portrayed by Gordon Scott and Steve Reeves. Both actors are at the peak of their considerable cinematic charisma. (Virna Lisi as Julia and Ornella Vanoni as the pants-wearing Tarpeia are also impressive!)

As I write (2006), the movie is virtually impossible to find except as a bootleg. It deserves a DVD release of a quality widescreen print.

The first detail to catch my eye about ROMOLO E REMO (DUEL OF THE TITANS) was the screenplay collaboration between the two Sergios of spaghetti Western fame: Corbuccci and Leone. By 1961, Corbucci had already directed quite a few biblical epics, disaster flicks, comedies starring Toto, and even sci-fi, mostly low budget; Leone would achieve global fame by directing FOR A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS three years later.

Alas, the screenplay is not ROMOLO E REMO's strongest card due to evidently implausible moments, but it wisely focuses on the relationship between the two brothers raised by a wolf who would - according to the legend - create Rome. That relation reminds one of the biblical Abel and Cain, Romolo the good guy, played by the splendidly fit, former Mr Universe Steve Reeves, Remo (Gordon Scott) the self-confessed envious sibling.

Both Reeves and Scott post muscular, larger than life physiques in this sword and sandal epic, with the great Massimo Girotti playing the king, Tazio, who does not want yet another settlement - the future eternal city, Rome, no less! - to steal thunder from his realm, and resents having his daughter abducted by Romolo.

Tazio's daughter is Iulia, played by the absolutely gorgeous Virni Lisi. Needless to say, Romolo is smitten at the sight of her, as any man worth his salt would be. Problem is, Remo - who already has loyal Laura Solari carrying a torch for him - also wants lovely Lisi, and has designs on becoming king of the new city that his sibling is so enthusiastic about... meaning that he wants no living brother to share power with. Now, that is real drama for you!

Cinematography by Enzo Barboni looks cheap, the battle sequences and the volcanic eruption reflect shoestring production values, but somehow Corbucci manages to keep the action interesting to the end. 7/10.

Brothers Romulus (Steve Reeves) and Remus (Gordon Scott), nursed by a wolf then raised by a shepherd, lead a rebellion and then fall out over a woman (sexy Virna Lisi) and over the founding of Rome, the eternal city. While likely not remembered as 'actor's actors', Reeves and Scott are absolutely fine in this colourful, well-made mytho-historial saga. The production manages to look more epic than it is and the battle scenes, while a bit small-scale, are quite well done. There is some fine horse stunt-work (notably in the early race through fire and in the final battle scenes - I suspect that the rules pertaining to animal stunts were more relaxed in Italy than in the US). The 'special effects' (such as arrows hitting in or near people) are well executed and although the dubbing leaves something to be desired, the characters are all fine for a sword-and-sandal opus. I watched this primarily because I wanted something 'visual that's not too abysmal', and was pleased (and surprised) that it wasn't abysmal at all. The torture scene, where Romulus is spun on something akin to a giant salad-spinner while being flogged, is one of a kind (and a tribute to the sacrifices the actor was willing to make for his art).

This movie is a pretty good movie, there's lots of action scenes, the storyline makes sense. It takes place in Ancient Rome. It's a good movie for the time period. What I didn't like as much was that the movie wasn't centered as much around the plot, but instead the movie was centered around the two men's muscles. It, again, is a good movie for the 60's, but cannot compare to modern movies. Overall, it's a pretty good movie worth seeing, but only if you don't mind that the main plot of the movie is the two men's muscles, how big they are, and how manly the men are.