AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
8,0/10
2,4 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaSilvio refuses to fight for the fascists and joins the resistance with Elena. After the war, his vitriolic newspaper articles cause him to be sentenced to imprisonment.Silvio refuses to fight for the fascists and joins the resistance with Elena. After the war, his vitriolic newspaper articles cause him to be sentenced to imprisonment.Silvio refuses to fight for the fascists and joins the resistance with Elena. After the war, his vitriolic newspaper articles cause him to be sentenced to imprisonment.
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias e 3 indicações no total
Loredana Nusciak
- Giovanna - amica di Elena
- (as Loredana Cappelletti)
Edith Peters
- Self
- (as Edith Catalano Peters)
Carlo Kechler
- Rustichelli - aristocrato
- (as Carlo Kecler)
Nina Hohenlohe-Oehringen
- Ospite in palazzo Rustichelli
- (as Nina Honenlohe Oehringen)
Avaliações em destaque
"A Difficult Life" (1961) stands as a poignant exploration of the everyday struggles and quiet resilience of ordinary people navigating the rapidly changing landscape of post-war Italy. The film weaves together moments of humor and heartbreak to create a narrative that is as socially incisive as it is emotionally resonant. Set against a backdrop of economic recovery and shifting societal norms, the story follows a man caught between the remnants of old-world traditions and the burgeoning modern era-a journey that is both deeply personal and reflective of the broader human condition.
From the very first scene, the director invites us into a world where every small victory is hard-won, and every setback serves as a reminder of the relentless passage of time. The protagonist, portrayed with remarkable nuance, is a man of quiet determination, whose life is punctuated by the challenges of maintaining dignity amid economic hardship and personal loss. His journey, marked by moments of self-discovery and unexpected levity, embodies the struggle to reconcile one's ambitions with the weight of societal expectations. This central performance is both understated and compelling, drawing the viewer into the intimate portrayal of a life that is, at once, uniquely individual and universally recognizable.
The screenplay of "A Difficult Life" is a masterclass in balancing satire with somber reflection. The dialogue is sharply written, capturing the wry humor that emerges in the face of adversity without diminishing the underlying gravity of the characters' circumstances. Each interaction-from family disputes to fleeting encounters with neighbors-resonates with authenticity, painting a vivid picture of a community grappling with its collective identity. The film's narrative structure, which shifts seamlessly between moments of comic relief and introspective melancholy, mirrors the unpredictable cadence of real life, where joy and sorrow often coexist in delicate equilibrium.
Visually, the film is a celebration of its time and place. The cinematography employs natural light and carefully chosen settings to evoke the texture of everyday life in post-war Italy. Urban streets, modest homes, and bustling marketplaces are captured with a documentary-like realism that not only grounds the film in its historical context but also highlights the inherent beauty in ordinary scenes. This visual authenticity is further enhanced by the film's muted color palette, which reflects both the austerity of the era and the nuanced spectrum of human emotion.
The music and sound design in "A Difficult Life" play an equally important role in building its immersive atmosphere. A subtly melancholic score underlines the film's reflective moments, while the ambient sounds of everyday life-the chatter of neighbors, the distant hum of city life-serve as a constant reminder of the world outside the immediate struggles of the characters. This thoughtful use of sound complements the narrative, adding emotional layers that resonate long after the credits roll.
In its thematic depth, "A Difficult Life" deftly examines the interplay between personal ambition and societal constraint. The film raises probing questions about what it means to pursue one's dreams in the face of relentless adversity and how the individual's quest for identity can be both thwarted and enriched by the world around them. It is a meditation on resilience-a reminder that while life's challenges may be many, they often bring with them moments of unexpected humor, tenderness, and hope.
Ultimately, "A Difficult Life" is much more than a period piece; it is a timeless reflection on the human spirit. Its carefully crafted narrative, memorable performances, and keen observations of everyday struggles combine to create a work that is both a product of its time and a universal story. Even decades after its release, the film continues to speak to audiences, inviting us to find beauty in hardship and to recognize that every difficult life carries the seeds of unexpected grace.
From the very first scene, the director invites us into a world where every small victory is hard-won, and every setback serves as a reminder of the relentless passage of time. The protagonist, portrayed with remarkable nuance, is a man of quiet determination, whose life is punctuated by the challenges of maintaining dignity amid economic hardship and personal loss. His journey, marked by moments of self-discovery and unexpected levity, embodies the struggle to reconcile one's ambitions with the weight of societal expectations. This central performance is both understated and compelling, drawing the viewer into the intimate portrayal of a life that is, at once, uniquely individual and universally recognizable.
The screenplay of "A Difficult Life" is a masterclass in balancing satire with somber reflection. The dialogue is sharply written, capturing the wry humor that emerges in the face of adversity without diminishing the underlying gravity of the characters' circumstances. Each interaction-from family disputes to fleeting encounters with neighbors-resonates with authenticity, painting a vivid picture of a community grappling with its collective identity. The film's narrative structure, which shifts seamlessly between moments of comic relief and introspective melancholy, mirrors the unpredictable cadence of real life, where joy and sorrow often coexist in delicate equilibrium.
Visually, the film is a celebration of its time and place. The cinematography employs natural light and carefully chosen settings to evoke the texture of everyday life in post-war Italy. Urban streets, modest homes, and bustling marketplaces are captured with a documentary-like realism that not only grounds the film in its historical context but also highlights the inherent beauty in ordinary scenes. This visual authenticity is further enhanced by the film's muted color palette, which reflects both the austerity of the era and the nuanced spectrum of human emotion.
The music and sound design in "A Difficult Life" play an equally important role in building its immersive atmosphere. A subtly melancholic score underlines the film's reflective moments, while the ambient sounds of everyday life-the chatter of neighbors, the distant hum of city life-serve as a constant reminder of the world outside the immediate struggles of the characters. This thoughtful use of sound complements the narrative, adding emotional layers that resonate long after the credits roll.
In its thematic depth, "A Difficult Life" deftly examines the interplay between personal ambition and societal constraint. The film raises probing questions about what it means to pursue one's dreams in the face of relentless adversity and how the individual's quest for identity can be both thwarted and enriched by the world around them. It is a meditation on resilience-a reminder that while life's challenges may be many, they often bring with them moments of unexpected humor, tenderness, and hope.
Ultimately, "A Difficult Life" is much more than a period piece; it is a timeless reflection on the human spirit. Its carefully crafted narrative, memorable performances, and keen observations of everyday struggles combine to create a work that is both a product of its time and a universal story. Even decades after its release, the film continues to speak to audiences, inviting us to find beauty in hardship and to recognize that every difficult life carries the seeds of unexpected grace.
Just when you are thinking that Italy is a stupid country, ever been stupid and hopeless not to be stupid, find your old VHS of this movie and watch it again. Neorealistic dramas of the forties and the fifties depict a country in comparison of which Transilvanya seems Disneyland, and that's not reasonable; comedies of the sixties and seventies are quite silly and superficial. This film, along with "C'eravamo tanto amati" in my opinion, is a perfectly balanced synthesis of both streams. There's fun and there's poverty, laughter and desperation, and this makes it the most truthful social portrait of this strange, controversial place I live in. It's a good summary of recent national history as well. And it contains two or three of the highest peaks of comedy of the entire world's cinema, see the argument with the restaurant owner for the bill (I fear it works only in Italian, though)or the dinner at the aristocratic family the evening of the elections for the choice between monarchy and republic. This is worth a couple of lines. Silvio, a leftist journalist and former guerrilla soldier against fascists, and his wife are rejected by restaurants because of their lack of money. They meet an aristocrat they know who invites them for dinner. The reason is not generosity but the fact that at that dinner there are thirteen people, and a common belief was that the circumstance would bring bad luck. At the table a full inventory of the meanest and most grotesque old fashioned conservative characters of the time, who, in an embarrassing way, try to hide their opinion on the new despicable hosts and to be kind to them. As the dishes arrive the couple forget good manners and make a show of themselves. Conversation falls on politics and Silvio enworsen his situation with some bitter comments, while his wife kicks him under the table. Suddenly come the results of the elections: Italians chose republic! Someone faint, some other curse, but Silvio and his wife hug each other. The monarchists, now mad, leave the room and here comes the scene you'll remember: the butler comes, bearing a bottle of champagne, solemnly he approaches the two proletarians and fills their glasses in silence.
10Queenfan
This movie is really beautiful: it shows the life of a medium italian, this kind of italian is performed by Alberto Sordi, and he is always very good to make this parts. You can laugh very much with this film, as in every Alberto Sordi film.
I'd say that it is the most Italian movie I've seen in my whole life (and yes I have seen a lots of them). The keyword is LAZY.
OK, there are a lot of things happening around the characters of the movie- the time is WWII. of course it was a hard time for Italians- Germans occupying Rome etc it isn't that they don't care about them. They do. anyway they don't do anything special, revolutional or hysterical. They just enjoy the life. maybe it wasn't the main idea of Dino Risi when he was making the film but is the main idea for me.
Perhaps I like it so much just cause for the first time I saw different Alberto Sordi- not that kind of crazy and stupid, and greedy man who all the time is jumping around and eating pasta and telling far-from-clever jokes to far-from-sexy and hysterical women. Maybe it is because first time in my life I heard the Italian hymn (Fratelli d'italia) used as a background in a movie and it didn't sound neither officious nor impertinent. Perhaps it is because of the atmosphere that is so lazy and romantic- the conversation scene in the bed in a lodge placed in the middle of the forest between Silvio and the young girl while his friends partisans were 'playing with the guns' outside. This is the way I saw Italy for the last time I was there. It was in autumn. Don't get me wrong- the events aren't taking place in autumn. It's just about the atmosphere.
I will lie if I say that this is a very important relating the history of civilization film. It isn't. It doesn't solve any psychological or political problems neither. Maybe it is more for those who are excited with Italy for the right reasons but don't live there yet/anymore.
OK, there are a lot of things happening around the characters of the movie- the time is WWII. of course it was a hard time for Italians- Germans occupying Rome etc it isn't that they don't care about them. They do. anyway they don't do anything special, revolutional or hysterical. They just enjoy the life. maybe it wasn't the main idea of Dino Risi when he was making the film but is the main idea for me.
Perhaps I like it so much just cause for the first time I saw different Alberto Sordi- not that kind of crazy and stupid, and greedy man who all the time is jumping around and eating pasta and telling far-from-clever jokes to far-from-sexy and hysterical women. Maybe it is because first time in my life I heard the Italian hymn (Fratelli d'italia) used as a background in a movie and it didn't sound neither officious nor impertinent. Perhaps it is because of the atmosphere that is so lazy and romantic- the conversation scene in the bed in a lodge placed in the middle of the forest between Silvio and the young girl while his friends partisans were 'playing with the guns' outside. This is the way I saw Italy for the last time I was there. It was in autumn. Don't get me wrong- the events aren't taking place in autumn. It's just about the atmosphere.
I will lie if I say that this is a very important relating the history of civilization film. It isn't. It doesn't solve any psychological or political problems neither. Maybe it is more for those who are excited with Italy for the right reasons but don't live there yet/anymore.
Another Alberto Sordi black comedy(similar to "il boom") with bouts of hilarity, but underlying a sad truth of postwar Italy in the 1950's.The existence of a minority of Italians unable to adapt to "bourgeois" civilian life after spending too many years soldiering during the 2nd world war.Alberto Sordi becomes an idealistic loser in an increasingly amoral,money grabbing society which Alberto Sordi tries to oppose, with honest journalism(his last permanent job). Alberto Sordi ends up losing everything,money,wife even freedom (he ends up in jail for libel).A most poignant moment of Alberto Sordi's life and Italian society in general is when Alberto Sordi returns to his wife's village in a luxurious car wearing expensive clothes..and wins back his wife .....but she soon finds out later that all these luxury goods were lent to him by his despotic boss, a rich industrialist who constantly humiliates Alberto Sordi as he works as a man servant in his villa !.(With a memorable final scene).One of Alberto's Sordi's best film(Also he says it too! ).Recently restored in Italy.A 9/10 film.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesBorante Domizlaff, who plays a Nazi Officer, was really a SS Officer during World War II. He was also among those accused of war crimes, specifically the Ardeatine Massacre; like most of the officers accused of that crime, he was acquitted, as only their superior officer Herbert Kappler was sentenced to life imprisonment.
- ConexõesFeatured in Legendy mirovogo kino: Alberto Sordi
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is A Difficult Life?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 71.630
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 9.167
- 5 de fev. de 2023
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 71.630
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 58 min(118 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente