Um casal envolvido em um caso amoroso atropela um ciclista com seu carro e não oferece ajuda por medo de seu relacionamento ser exposto.Um casal envolvido em um caso amoroso atropela um ciclista com seu carro e não oferece ajuda por medo de seu relacionamento ser exposto.Um casal envolvido em um caso amoroso atropela um ciclista com seu carro e não oferece ajuda por medo de seu relacionamento ser exposto.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias no total
- María José de Castro
- (as Lucia Bose)
- Matilde Luque Carvajal
- (as Bruna Corra)
- Comisario
- (as Jose Sepulveda)
- Decano
- (as Jose Prada)
- Padre Iturrioz
- (as Manuel Arbo)
- Nico
- (as Rufino Ingles)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Maria Jose Castro (portrayed by the lovely Lucia Bose) is married to wealthy Miguel Castro (Otello Toso). It is a marriage of convenience, she has everything she wants materially, but nothing of love or emotion left in the marriage. She spends her days in a circle of bored friends, attending lunches, but wishing to be with her lover Juan Fernandez Soler (Alberto Closas).
The cinematography here is intriguing and sinister. Stark landscapes, cold winter, yet the people involved are comfortable and corrupt, drinking and dining.
Of course the character of Rafa Sandoval (played by Carlos Casaravilla) is excellent and elemental to a pivotal part of the story. He has seen the couple in their car on the highway, but just how much he has seen he will not divulge to Maria Jose. It is an ongoing teaser that we watch in suspense...we are not certain what each character will do.
Juan Fernandez, a professor of mathematics is merely existing, he resents his job which was acquired through his in-laws. He is tired of keeping up appearances.
There is a twist and you should watch this film more than once for the subtle nuances and character actors who play a part in the mood.
It begins with the death of a cyclist, but evolves into study of society, politics, and how people act out to endure their mortality, or the prison of their mortality. In the end it is their choice. 10/10.
Thing is, this is so good that it can be viewed without all those details. There is a brilliant script and the characters are much more well written than other 50's film characters, these have "flesh and blood", you feel for them, you understand their troubles. The most interesting character is the protagonist. Up to a point, the whole movie was exciting but not unique. However something happened (the "incident" with his student) and from this point, movie elevated to a masterpiece, the protagonist transformed into something else and overall, the script was not a movie script anymore but great Literature.
The ending of this movie is not the original ending which was a much more powerful and daring ending. Unfortunately, the Dictatorship censored it. Yet, the ending of the movie was still good. But this 8.2/10 is a rating for the original ending.
Alberto Closas gave one of the greatest acting performances i have ever seen.
The pair are threatened when a pianist/art critic (Carlos Casaravilla) begins making oblique comments hinting that he knows something, and then later when the pair disagree about whether to admit what they've done or not. This tension is strong in the beginning, but falters a bit with an unnecessary subplot involving one of the professor's students, as well as in becoming a bit too much of a morality tale. It's also pretty clear what the art critic knows, but the pretense for ambiguity is carried on a little too long, and this interesting subplot and character aren't taken advantage of in better ways. It picks up towards the end though, with Bosè delivering some great moments through the coolness of her eyes, and a dramatic finish.
The film makes social points in showing how far the wealthy will go to obtain or maintain their position, and you can see in it political commentary too. After the war, society is stratified in unfair ways, with a big gap between the powerful and the poor, and indeed, the powerful can sometimes believe they are above the law. The scene of the crime being near a battlefield seems to mean that this horrifying but relatively small act is a microcosm of much larger crimes having been committed against Spain, or something along those lines. Seen from that perspective, perhaps the ending is less the natural conclusion of a morality tale, and more a subversive message, which was interesting to think about. It's when I consider these aspects and the courage it took for Bardem to make films like this under Franco that I liked 'Death of a Cyclist' best. As just a drama alone, it's probably just average, but it could be rated higher because of this context.
The context of the film is an accident in which a car collides with a bycicle. Inside the car there are a man and a woman having an extramarital relationship. To keep their relationship secret, they don't call for help and the cyclist dies. A little while later someone tries to blackmail them, because "he knows something".
From that moment on the film takes on a guilt and penitence character. The central theme of the film is that the penitence that the man experiences is totally different from the penitence of the woman.
The man feels the guilt inside. The question if the widow of the death cyclist is left behind well cared for torments him and he tries to gather information about this question.
For the woman her quilt is more of an external nature. She sees her guilt as a threat to her luxury life. A life in which her older husband brings in money and her younger lover brings in pleasure. As long as the knowledge of the accident is limited to herself the threat shall not materialize. She goes at great length to find out what the blackmailer exactly knows. Knows he only about her extramarital relationship or also about the traffic accident?
In the opening scene we see the two lovers together. In the rest of the film we see them mostly apart. Through smart editing the director stresses the different ways the two main characters are handling their common guilt.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesLucia Bose was an Italian actress who did not speak fluent Spanish. For this film, all of her dialogue was dubbed by another actress.
- Erros de gravaçãoA cameraman's hand is visible in the back seat when Maria Jose is alone in the car towards the end.
- Citações
Miguel Castro: The other day, someone told me a very interesting story. The story of a happy marriage that went downhill.
María José de Castro: Why?
Miguel Castro: The woman tricked the man.
María José de Castro: Oh really? How original.
Miguel Castro: Let me finish. The woman tricked the man. They were both good people, especially the woman. And he had a lot of money.
María José de Castro: So what did the husband do, kill his wife?
Miguel Castro: No, even better. He left her. Without a penny, suddenly she lost her entire life. Even everyday life, lost. And nobody wanted to give her a hand. Do you like it?
María José de Castro: The story? It's not too bad. Who told it to you?
Miguel Castro: Rafa.
- ConexõesFeatured in Cuando Franco murió, yo tenía 30 años (2005)
Principais escolhas
- How long is Death of a Cyclist?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Death of a Cyclist
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 28 min(88 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1