Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA man is framed and sent to prison for a crime he didn't commit. When he is let out on limited parole, he sets out to clear his name and find the real criminals.A man is framed and sent to prison for a crime he didn't commit. When he is let out on limited parole, he sets out to clear his name and find the real criminals.A man is framed and sent to prison for a crime he didn't commit. When he is let out on limited parole, he sets out to clear his name and find the real criminals.
Ted Billings
- Bar Patron
- (não creditado)
George Cleveland
- Gas Station Attendant
- (não creditado)
Lester Dorr
- Bank Teller
- (não creditado)
Jane Keckley
- Hawkins' Landlady
- (não creditado)
Donald Kerr
- Barfly
- (não creditado)
Frank LaRue
- Orbison's Boss
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
Former football star Dave " Whizz " Tyler is convicted of a robbery and spends three years in jail . Given parole he faces completing the remaining six years if he breaks his parole but vows that he's innocent of the crime and will do everything to prove it
You don't need to be a jailbird to know the convicts code - you don't snitch . If a tunnel suddenly appears in the next cell and you suddenly find a pneumatic drill in your own cell then you invoke the Nuremberg defence of " I didn't hear anything , I didn't see anything , this has got nothing to do with me " and you'll probably live long enough to complete your sentence
With a title like CONVICT'S CODE you could be forgiven for thinking you're going to be watching the similar sounding premise of EACH DAWN I DIE where an innocent man who has been framed trying to clear his name surrounded by hardened criminals . This isn't how the film works out . Instead we get Whizz Tyler walking about from one cheap studio set to another with not very good actors who are marginally just less wooden than the sets
There's also something that puzzled me and that is Whizz continually claims to be innocent to everyone including the prison Warden and his parole officer and I kept wondering how the parole board works in America . In Scottish and English law someone is only eligible for parole if they admit to the crime and are genuinely sorry they did the crime . Someone claiming they are innocent wouldn't in theory qualify . Of course the practise is entirely different and we've been treated to some truly hideous sights like Johnathan King calling a press conference on his day of release saying his victims were lying and he can prove it . Needless to say we're still waiting for this evidence to surface . I was under the impression that America does tend to be a lot stricter about parole and its granting of it
You don't need to be a jailbird to know the convicts code - you don't snitch . If a tunnel suddenly appears in the next cell and you suddenly find a pneumatic drill in your own cell then you invoke the Nuremberg defence of " I didn't hear anything , I didn't see anything , this has got nothing to do with me " and you'll probably live long enough to complete your sentence
With a title like CONVICT'S CODE you could be forgiven for thinking you're going to be watching the similar sounding premise of EACH DAWN I DIE where an innocent man who has been framed trying to clear his name surrounded by hardened criminals . This isn't how the film works out . Instead we get Whizz Tyler walking about from one cheap studio set to another with not very good actors who are marginally just less wooden than the sets
There's also something that puzzled me and that is Whizz continually claims to be innocent to everyone including the prison Warden and his parole officer and I kept wondering how the parole board works in America . In Scottish and English law someone is only eligible for parole if they admit to the crime and are genuinely sorry they did the crime . Someone claiming they are innocent wouldn't in theory qualify . Of course the practise is entirely different and we've been treated to some truly hideous sights like Johnathan King calling a press conference on his day of release saying his victims were lying and he can prove it . Needless to say we're still waiting for this evidence to surface . I was under the impression that America does tend to be a lot stricter about parole and its granting of it
Convict's Code is a surprisingly engaging little film noir about Dave Tyler, a man on parole who tries to clear his name while trying not to get thrown back in the slammer. While the reasoning why Dave is hired by a man who wants him thrown back into prison is highly ridiculous, as is the totally melodramatic conclusion, the in-betweens are great, with Robert Kent doing a fine job as the tormented parolee, and Anne Nagel equally fine as his (of course!) blonde haired girlfriend, who mustn't know that he's a parolee, because of course, they have to get permission from his parole officer! (Oh, and she's also the heavy's sister). Actually, this film carefully describes parole life back in 1939, and seems to be more of a burden on a person then it is now. Quite interesting and entertaining!
(1939) Convict's Code
CRIME DRAMA
It centers on a former football player, Dave Tyler (Robert Kent) on his first day out, granted parole after serving three years of his six year sentence with strict conditions. And despite offered a job with Gregory Warren investment company, he still visits old friends such as newspaper man, Jeff (Ben Alexander) we find out it was regarding a bank robbery to which he says he has nothing to do with. Except that during the conversation, there were six witnesses who said they had saw him. As it turned out, Dave's boss Greg Warren and his accomplice, Joe Russell (Norman Willis) were coincidentally the ones who framed him. Complicating matters is the fact that as soon as he begins working for him, he falls in love with his sister, Julie Warren (Anne Nagel) as he is continued to be tailed by his boss right hand man, Pete Jennings (Carleton Young) to continue to inform him what he is up to.
I was involved until it got to the fourth act I thought was dumb and nonsensical to which as soon as Dave's trusted friend, Jeff Palmer (Ben Alexander) who happened to be a journalist got the names of the supposedly six witnesses, why can't he go and investigate them as opposed to the guy, Dave who could not violate his parole. And what would make this make even more sense is why can't Dave's friend Jeff as a journalist/ newspaper man investigate the six witnesses while Dave is serving time in prison. The movie never answers.
It centers on a former football player, Dave Tyler (Robert Kent) on his first day out, granted parole after serving three years of his six year sentence with strict conditions. And despite offered a job with Gregory Warren investment company, he still visits old friends such as newspaper man, Jeff (Ben Alexander) we find out it was regarding a bank robbery to which he says he has nothing to do with. Except that during the conversation, there were six witnesses who said they had saw him. As it turned out, Dave's boss Greg Warren and his accomplice, Joe Russell (Norman Willis) were coincidentally the ones who framed him. Complicating matters is the fact that as soon as he begins working for him, he falls in love with his sister, Julie Warren (Anne Nagel) as he is continued to be tailed by his boss right hand man, Pete Jennings (Carleton Young) to continue to inform him what he is up to.
I was involved until it got to the fourth act I thought was dumb and nonsensical to which as soon as Dave's trusted friend, Jeff Palmer (Ben Alexander) who happened to be a journalist got the names of the supposedly six witnesses, why can't he go and investigate them as opposed to the guy, Dave who could not violate his parole. And what would make this make even more sense is why can't Dave's friend Jeff as a journalist/ newspaper man investigate the six witnesses while Dave is serving time in prison. The movie never answers.
Five years ago, Sidney Blackmer framed Robert Kent for a robbery. Now Kent's friends have gotten him out on parole, and he's to work for Blackmer, who wants to keep a watch on him; he figures he can always violate him back to prison. Kent is trying to find the witnesses who falsely identified him, but he and Blackmer's sister, Anne Neagle, have fallen in love.
It's a B movie plot, and John Krafft's script is B movie material, and it's a Monogram picture. The cast is good, though, and the director is Lambert Hillyer, who had been an A director for William S. Hart, and he works the scenes at a crackling pace and his actors make their lines sound convincing, turning the film into a variation of the Good Bad Man movies that Hillyer and Hart had done. It's clear that the production was done on the cheap, and Hillyer would never venture beyond B westerns and the occasional serial again. However this is a nice little movie to cap his non-western career.
It's a B movie plot, and John Krafft's script is B movie material, and it's a Monogram picture. The cast is good, though, and the director is Lambert Hillyer, who had been an A director for William S. Hart, and he works the scenes at a crackling pace and his actors make their lines sound convincing, turning the film into a variation of the Good Bad Man movies that Hillyer and Hart had done. It's clear that the production was done on the cheap, and Hillyer would never venture beyond B westerns and the occasional serial again. However this is a nice little movie to cap his non-western career.
Former college football star Dave Tyler (Robert Kent) maintains his innocence even after three years in prison. He gets released on parole and sets about finding the real culprits. His new bosses are actually the criminals who had set him up and he falls for the bosses' sister.
This is a B-movie crime drama. The filmmaking is simple without much style. The acting isn't any better. The writing is the most problematic. One would think that the perpetrators would keep their distance from Tyler especially since he seems clueless to their scheme. It is solidly stuck in B-movie territory and can't rise above it.
This is a B-movie crime drama. The filmmaking is simple without much style. The acting isn't any better. The writing is the most problematic. One would think that the perpetrators would keep their distance from Tyler especially since he seems clueless to their scheme. It is solidly stuck in B-movie territory and can't rise above it.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Convict's Code?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Paroled to Exile
- Locações de filme
- Malibou Lake, Agoura Hills, Califórnia, EUA(across Malibou Lake Mountain Club)
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 2 min(62 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente