Crackerjack

Ever since the 13th century legend of Robin Hood surfaced, writers have created various good thieves as heroes. "The Adventures of Robin Hood" was first made as a 1922 silent film and then in a 1938 technicolor sound movie that is a classic today. That swashbuckler starred Erol Flynn and Olivia de Haviland and was set in the early Middle Ages.

"The Man With 100 Faces" film is a modern rendition, also set in England. It is based on a 1926 novel by William B.M. Ferguson, "Other Folks' Money: an adventure story." As the mythical Robin Hood before him, "Crackerjack" robs from the rich to help the poor. Only, the real person known as Crackerjack isn't known. And, the Sherwood Forest where the thievery takes places in this film is the world of the wealthy and high society of London.

Tom Walls stars as Jack Drake, aka "Crackerjack," known as such only by his personal secretary, Burdge (played by Charles Heslop), and a couple of other characters who are mostly out of sight except when needed. One can't help thinking that the Batman comic stories seem to have similar characters - masks that hide real identities, only a choice few in on the real people, and heroes for justice. Of course the hero there is independently wealthy.

Jack Drake has been taking from the wealthy for the benefit of the needy and good causes. After some years, he writes a book about his exploits. The best seller earns him considerable "honest" money on which to live - for a time. But, as he continues to give to good causes, he must once again resort to relieving the rich of some of their surplus.

Lili Palmer plays the love of Drake's life, Baroness Von Haltz. The film has a sizable cast of characters, many with substantial roles. All perform very well. Walls is particularly interesting to watch for his different disguises. He is excellent in each of his different roles. A mark of the superb makeup as well as his acting, is that one can barely tell that it is Walls under those disguises. But for the sake of the audience, he makes one or two gestures to convince viewers that this isn't a stand-in or double.

For a very early sound film, this one has quite good quality. It's an interesting story that has some nice scenes of the culture and social landscape of London just before World War II. This is a very good comedy mystery that those who like old films especially should enjoy.

Here are some favorite lines from the film.

Sculpie, after Jack Drake knocks out Benting of Scotland Yard during the airplane heist, "Thanks, brother. What's the big idea?" Jack Drake, "Well, I thought he might prefer a headache to lead."

Superintendent Benting, "From now on, every crime in the country will be attributed to Crackerjack."

Superintendent Benting, "Don't forget to let me know if you get on the trail of Crackerjack." Baroness Von Haltz, "Why should I do your work for you?" Benting, "Because, it's a woman's job, not a policeman's."

Jack Drake, "You've hit on the two reasons that are keeping me here. Firstly, the infernal woman you mentioned. And secondly, I dislike having my nice clean charitable robberies messed up by a lot of murdering swine. I'm gonna put those gangsters out of business." Burdge, "How?" Drake, "I haven't the faintest idea."

Hambro Golding, "You're a very clever young woman." Baroness Von Haltz, "You're the second person within the last hour who has told me that this is a woman's job."

Baroness Von Haltz, "The only way you'll meet that man is to catch him on a job."

Hambro Golding, "Many problems, my dear, have been solved by a woman's intuition."

Jack Drake, to Burdge, "You ought to know by now, that where the baroness Is concerned, you matter very little."

The film begins with a scene in which a plane is hijacked by a gang of criminals and some precious diamonds are stolen. However it is not the gang that gets away with the loot but rather the master thief and modern day Robin Hood, Jack Drake, who has beaten the gang to it. Meanwhile, the latest craze in London is the memoirs of a thief, who goes by the pseudonym of "Crackerjack." When a string of precious pearls is stolen at a society party, Crackerjack is suspected, owning to a number of idiosyncrasies of the culprit, which are also mentioned in Crackerjack's book. But who is Crackerjack - is he Jack Drake? And will Jack get away with his philanthropic thieving?

This film is good entertainment but nothing special. The sort of story that the film uses involving gangs of criminals, stolen jewels and princesses (or a Baroness in this case) has been used so many times before - even by Tom Walls himself - that it needs something special to make it work. There are a few fairly uninventive twists in the plot - the people you least expect turn out to be criminals and so on. All of it leads to a rather formulaic showdown towards the end of the film. Nevertheless, there are a few good surprises which add interest to what would otherwise be a fairly average film. For me, the most disappointing thing is that we know who Crackerjack is for almost all of the film. I think it would've added a whole extra dimension to the film if the answer had've been denied us until the end - and it would've justified the existence of the "Crackerjack" book, which, as the film stood, was totally peripheral to the plot.

Tom Walls makes a wonderful gentleman criminal; almost as great as James Mason, but in a different, more old-world chivalrous way. His name on the bill was what made me decide to watch this film, and he is definitely its strongest link. The rest of the cast are nothing special and I found Lilli Palmer a tad annoying but an acceptable leading lady. Overall the story is sufficiently engrossing and consistent enough to make this reasonable viewing - but only slightly above average.

This an early attempt at the gentleman thief idea and it works beautifully. The film offers much elegance, wit and sophistication, just like its two stars. If only Hollywood produced this type of film today.

I've always liked Tom Walls' farces – this is a more straightforward comedy, full of frothy sometimes witty dialogue and period furnishings with music veering from staid British dance band to hot American and a corny yet cogent script. Mind you, it also had an innocent bystander shot by hoodlums at point blank defending "a string of duds" from being stolen.

Mysterious and confident cracksman robs to order for almost purely altruistic reasons, but takes great exception when he's embroiled with and considered by the police to be the head hoodlum of a rather nasty gang of thieves so decides decidedly to clear his alias. It's inventive and predictable at the same time, interesting and so-so – basically I enjoyed it! It was the first time of viewing, I really wouldn't mind taking another crack at it and viewing it again sometime. Tom Walls is urbane and monocled, Lilli Palmer is elegant and shrewd, Noel Madison is snarly and impetuous – and everything else runs true to form too. There seems to be even more of an age-gulf between Lilli and the rest of the cast which was ignored of course so we have to accept it too and put any qualms we may have down to our collective post-rock and roll cynicism. The other star of the picture is Art Deco – for example the "hotel" and its interiors and furniture where a lot of the story is based is quite breathtaking at times in its poignant gleaming beauty. Not so long ago this fashion was sneered at, now that it's becoming more obvious we're living in a completely styleless age the focus on the past only gets sharper.

And yes, that's clearly a sound mike seen dangling in the ornate mirror in Lilli Palmer's apartment at 46 minutes – even that's interesting to view! Enjoyable stuff, but probably only to those of us who appreciate British pre-War comedies.

This is boring. Tom Walls (Jack) is known as Crackerjack. He steals jewellery and hands out the proceeds of his thieving to good causes like hospitals. He's a bit creepy looking especially when he visits the children in a hospital. The whole thing just reminded me of Jimmy Saville. Anyway, on one particular job, a party gets held up by a gang who have been beaten to the prize once again by Walls. On this occasion, a rather fat rugby-player who is meant to be England's captain gets shot dead. Eventually the film finishes but you may be in a coma by that point.

We also get an unlikely romance due to the age gap - again, a bit creepy. The cast aren't that good and speak in that upper class English accent. It's a shame because I was looking forward to this Gainsborough film. The lady at the beginning is the standout during the logo.