AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,0/10
1,9 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAllen Quinton writes a fellow soldier's love letters; tragedy results. Later, Allen meets a beautiful amnesiac who fears postmen...Allen Quinton writes a fellow soldier's love letters; tragedy results. Later, Allen meets a beautiful amnesiac who fears postmen...Allen Quinton writes a fellow soldier's love letters; tragedy results. Later, Allen meets a beautiful amnesiac who fears postmen...
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Indicado a 4 Oscars
- 2 vitórias e 6 indicações no total
Harry Allen
- Farmer
- (não creditado)
Conrad Binyon
- Boy in Library
- (não creditado)
Nina Borget
- Italian Waitress
- (não creditado)
Matthew Boulton
- Judge
- (não creditado)
Clifford Brooke
- Cart Driver
- (não creditado)
David Clyde
- Postman
- (não creditado)
Alec Craig
- Dodd
- (não creditado)
Catherine Craig
- Jeanette Campbell
- (não creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
It is not right that Random Harvest, which came 3 years earlier and played on very similar plot notes, is considered a timeless classic whereas Love Letters has somehow been relegated to the dustbin of cinematic history and is almost impossible to find these days.
First, the teaming of Cotton and Jones is magical. Cotton could not give a bad performance if his life depended on it (he was always the first casting choice for an Orson Wells project) and Jones had a rare on screen charisma which is unequalled in the present day. (Three years after this project, they did Portrait of Jennie together, a truly perfect and one of a kind production which leaves Random Harvest in its dust.)
Love Letters is not perfect but it is a still a masterpiece. The first act is flawless, especially the clever transition from Cotton's uneasy sense that writing love letters for another man is itself an act that only lead to calamity... to the almost Hitchcockian mystery as to what actually happened to Jones' character.
The second act however seems a bit long and perhaps stretched. Ninety minutes might have made a tighter film.
In spite of such quibbling Love Letters is a remarkable piece of entertainment and deserves more attention from cinephiles than it is getting.
First, the teaming of Cotton and Jones is magical. Cotton could not give a bad performance if his life depended on it (he was always the first casting choice for an Orson Wells project) and Jones had a rare on screen charisma which is unequalled in the present day. (Three years after this project, they did Portrait of Jennie together, a truly perfect and one of a kind production which leaves Random Harvest in its dust.)
Love Letters is not perfect but it is a still a masterpiece. The first act is flawless, especially the clever transition from Cotton's uneasy sense that writing love letters for another man is itself an act that only lead to calamity... to the almost Hitchcockian mystery as to what actually happened to Jones' character.
The second act however seems a bit long and perhaps stretched. Ninety minutes might have made a tighter film.
In spite of such quibbling Love Letters is a remarkable piece of entertainment and deserves more attention from cinephiles than it is getting.
This is one of the 4 (successful) pairings of Joseph Cotten and Jennifer Jones. The latter receiving 3 Oscar nominations for her (their?) efforts (including this one). The debonair Cotten and the delightful Jones are perfectly cast. The title of the film provides the "connecting thread" for our seemingly doomed lovers. This mystery/love story is a "grabber" beginning to end. The film is a cornucopia of actions and emotions. The English countryside is very effective for this tale. The inevitability of their fates is obvious, but it's a very long and twisted road to get there....... and a very enjoyable road too...
Joseph Cotten at his best, Jennifer Jones at her best, and a fine supporting cast... A MUST SEE...
Joseph Cotten at his best, Jennifer Jones at her best, and a fine supporting cast... A MUST SEE...
I have seen this video many times mainly because I absolutely adore Jennifer Jones.She is an awesome beauty and I must be honest, a sexual fantasy of mine.The fact she is playing a Canadian orphan in the film at least explains her accent.The story of an amnesiac who gradually becomes her true self is OK but why oh why does Hollywood insist on producing "twee" versions of "little 'ole England" in California complete with "gargoyles"? Surely English actors playing English characters in England would have been more authentic.Just to throw in a few English actors (Gladys Cooper and a boy in the London Journal reading room plus stock film company footage of London England, is not convincing enough to the film connoisseur).Also how could a private home have a view overlooking Trafalgar Square!This is unsubtle image - fixing on innocent susceptible eyes.I am sure Americans cringe just as much when they hear unconvincing American accents from non-U.S. nationals.Jo Cotten had the great good fortune to appear to my knowledge with Ms Jones also in Duel in the Sun (1946)/Portrait of Jennie (1948) and Since you went away (1944).Therefore they had already done a film together and their scenes worked well and I almost found myself forgetting his "English" accent! JJ never looked more lovely than in this 1945 picture and there is a very memorable scene when Alan (Jo Cotton) comes back to his house in Essex and receives a call from Dilly Carson (Ann Richards) that "Singleton" appears to have gone missing.Suddenly there is a giggle and the lovely "Singleton" a.k.a.Victoria Moreland, (JJ), pops up from the sofa to surprise Alan- JJ looks absolutely stunning!
"Love Letters" is one of the most interesting films of 1945, yet it's seldom seen these days. We watched an excellent copy of it courtesy of a cable channel. The picture has kept well throughout the years. Directed by an old pro of that period, William Dieterle, and with an excellent cinematography by Lee Garmes, it was a joy to watch again. Victor Young's haunting musical score plays softly in the background.
Some comments seem to indicate that Ayn Rand wrote the original work in which the movie is based. Contrary to those opinions, the fact is it was based on a Christopher Massie's novel, "Pity my Simplicity", and adapted by the author and Ms. Rand into the finished product. Ms. Rand was an obvious admirer of the French playwright Edmund Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac, which plays in the action without making it too obvious.
The best thing in "Love Letters" was the casting of the main roles. Jennifer Jones and Joseph Cotten played with their characters with conviction. Ms. Jones was at a great moment of her movie career; her dual role of Victoria Morland/Singleton proved she was the right choice for it. Mr. Cotten was an actor that always delivered, as it's the case with his character, Allen Quinton, the man who has loved Victoria from a distance.
The marvelous cast is enhanced by Gladys Cooper, who is seen as Beatrice Remington, the woman who brought up Victoria as her own daughter and who holds the key to solving the mystery of the tragedy that involves Victoria. Ann Richards and Cecil Kellaway are also seen in minor roles.
"Love Letters" will delight fans of the genre as it is one of the better exponent of the Hollywood of the 40s.
Some comments seem to indicate that Ayn Rand wrote the original work in which the movie is based. Contrary to those opinions, the fact is it was based on a Christopher Massie's novel, "Pity my Simplicity", and adapted by the author and Ms. Rand into the finished product. Ms. Rand was an obvious admirer of the French playwright Edmund Rostand's Cyrano de Bergerac, which plays in the action without making it too obvious.
The best thing in "Love Letters" was the casting of the main roles. Jennifer Jones and Joseph Cotten played with their characters with conviction. Ms. Jones was at a great moment of her movie career; her dual role of Victoria Morland/Singleton proved she was the right choice for it. Mr. Cotten was an actor that always delivered, as it's the case with his character, Allen Quinton, the man who has loved Victoria from a distance.
The marvelous cast is enhanced by Gladys Cooper, who is seen as Beatrice Remington, the woman who brought up Victoria as her own daughter and who holds the key to solving the mystery of the tragedy that involves Victoria. Ann Richards and Cecil Kellaway are also seen in minor roles.
"Love Letters" will delight fans of the genre as it is one of the better exponent of the Hollywood of the 40s.
This film is more than just the best of the "other fellow writes love notes" genre. The Ayn Rand screenplay, though a potboiler, conveys the absolutist nature of true romantic love, which certainly dovetailed nicely with her objectivist philosophy. Jennifer Jones is lovely as ever, and extremely convincing in her amnesiac role. A fine film.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe role of Victoria Morland/Singleton was initially planned for Ann Richards, but after Jennifer Jones became available, Richards ended up playing Dilly, Singleton's friend.
- Erros de gravaçãoDilly Carson relates to Alan Quinton that she found Singleton sitting by the fireplace with a bloody knife and a letter from which Dilly quotes the signature line, "I think of you my dearest as the distance promise of beauty". But during the climactic flashback, we see the letter with that very line burning in the fireplace.
- Citações
Allen Quinton: You are so calm, it is so contagious, you... you are so happy.
Victoria Morland: I will tell you the secret, just two words, "Be yourself". You are afraid of that, everybody is. But I have no choice, I can't be anything but myself.
- ConexõesReferenced in Mamãezinha Querida (1981)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Love Letters?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Love Letters
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 41 min(101 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente