O Pecado de Nora Moran

THE SIN OF NORA MORAN (Majestic, 1933) directed by Phil Goldstone, with title inspiration to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer's THE SIN OF MADELIN CLAUDET (1931) featuring Helen Hayes, is a low-budget production with high production values. Starring Zita Johann, a notable stage actress with few films to her credit. her characterization of Nora Moran offer her a very rare opportunity in a feature film performance.

The plot opens as John Grant (Alan Dinehart), a district attorney, is visited by Edith Crawford (Claire DuPrey), his sister, regarding a handful of unsigned love letters belonging to her deceased husband and governor of the state, Dick Crawford (Paul Cavanagh). Grant reveals the woman to be Nora Moran, age 21, in prison on death row awaiting her execution. Through flashback, Grant relates the sin of Nora Moran, Crawford's mistress, starting as a child of six where young Nora (Cora Sue Collins) is adopted by Mr. and Mrs. Moran (Harvey Clark and Aggie Herring). Following their deaths, the teenage Nora (Zita Johann) faces life of uncertainty. With the help of her good friend, Father Ryan (Henry B. Walthall), Nora goes on her own searching for work until eventually working for the King Brothers Circus under Paulino (John Miljan), a lion tamer. She leaves the circus after Paulino forces himself on her. While in New York, Nora becomes a chorus girl in musical shows, attracting attention of Dick Crawford (Paul Cavanagh), a man with political ambitions. She learns through Grant that Dick has a wife, but continues to show her love for Dick by preventing Paulino from ruining his political career through blackmail. Grant's story further reveals why Nora ended up in prison and awaiting execution. Also in the cast are Sarah Padden, Ann Brody, Syd Saylor and Otis Harlan.

I first saw THE SIN OF NORA MORAN when presented during the after midnight hours on New York City's WOR, Channel 9 back in 1982 under another title, VOICE FROM THE GRAVE. With Zita Johann, best known for co-starring opposite Boris Karloff in THE MUMMY (Universal, 1932), I assumed this to be another horror movie. I have never heard of VOICE FROM THE GRAVE and wanted to see what it was all about. After many years in obscurity, THE SIN OF NORA MORAN (title restored) not only turned up on DVD, but made its Turner Classic Movies premiere May 3, 2020, by this viewing refreshed my memory. Following the original theatrical title and opening credits, THE SIN OF NORA MORAN predated those film elements used frequently during the 1940s through its grand mix of film noir narrative, montage sequences, voice over thoughts, split screen changeover, non-stop underscoring, and slight dose of supernatural overtones. Coming from an independent movie studio as Majestic, THE SIN OF NORA MORAN works surprisingly well through its then unique method of storytelling told during its 64 minutes. Aside from THE POWER AND THE GLORY (Fox, 1933) starring Spencer Tracy, it makes one wonder if there are any other flashback narratives of this sort that have become virtually unknown to film scholars?

Regardless of this newfound rediscovery and interesting premise, it appears Zita Johann's legacy continues to remain more for THE MUMMY than THE SIN OF NORA MORAN. (**)

MAJESTIC PICTURES in their short Hollywood production life 1930-35 made excellent small films using sets at other studios. This meant they could use those facilities and instead spend big on actors and crew. Without studio overheads their input concentrated on finding and using excellent A grade sets and costumes and facilities without owning them. As a result their films had an RKO or MGM look. Actors would be called to make a film at RKO and find it a Majestic title ensuring constant work on a big lot but maybe for a minor player. This allowed Majestic to get A tech and image at a bargain rate and not embarrass their desired actors. However in this film they even excelled themselves and most Hollywood majors studio style in creating a unique melancholy almost- noir nightmare of doomed love and honor... and all the emotional treachery that goes with it. Somewhere between SORRY WRONG NUMBER and DETOUR and overlapping time shift of PULP FICTION, this film THE SIN OF NORA MORAN uses those techniques and techniques of voice over, flashback and sad romance with equal parts hangman's noose, resigned fate and deceit. What a find! THE SIN OF NORA MORAN is a film school textbook of economic film making and could easily stand an upgraded remake today. Excellent! Treat yourself!. Good restored UCLA DVD too. Zita Johan in the lead part as Nora is simply exquisite and her melancholy tone throughout is most effective. Her sin? Being born.

Zita Johann is 21 year old "nora", hiding some deep secret. she is wrapped up in a murder. she knows stuff, but she's not saying much. made in 1933, so even the posters for the film are pretty naughty. convicted of a murder, nora lets us see things through her flashbacks. she starts out in her jail cell, but now we're retracing the events. co-stars John Miljan as Paulino. she gets a job with the circus, and is happy until.. she is brutally attacked by the lion tamer. she leaves, and starts dating someone running for governor. more flashbacks. some twists and turns along the way. Directed by Phil Goldstone. he had produced many films, but only directed thirteen. original story by w.m. goodhue. Pretty good stuff!

The Sin of Nora Moran is a 1933 "talkie" picture. Why it's legendary has more to do with the camera effects used, the movie poster, and the use of flashbacks and talk-overs more than the actual plot of the film itself. That's the hard part to put yourself into in the 21st century. You can imagine all the oohs, and aahs, and confusion & shock of movie-goers in 1933, but after almost 90 years it's hard to feel that way yourself. The movie concerns itself with Nora, and the reason she is on death row awaiting execution. There are double and triple twists aplenty. Probably the most shocking thing in the film that I noticed was an implied rape. I can imagine how controversial this must have been back in the day, if I can tell what the implication was meant to be today. Another impressive feat of the movie is how well the story is told, despite all the time changes that happen during the course of the movie. At 65 minutes it doesn't lag at all, and it also serves to show how well an almost lost film can be brought back to life to breathe again on our small screens at home. Worth a watch to experience a revolution in '30's movie-making.

This film's not quite what you expect from 1933, the trailer boasts that it uses the famous 'narratage' technique from Preston Sturges's The Power and Glory, with Flashbacks and narration; then Flashbacks within Flashbacks. At just sixty five minutes the plot twists are great and the old fashioned dialog is really quite funny.

Made on a tight budget, it manages to look like a bigger movie using library footage and cleaver back projection. Overall well worth watching just for the novelty value.