O assassinato da cheerleader
Título original: Death of a Cheerleader
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,1/10
601
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA shy outsider tries to make friends with the popular high school cheerleader and seeks revenge after she's rejected.A shy outsider tries to make friends with the popular high school cheerleader and seeks revenge after she's rejected.A shy outsider tries to make friends with the popular high school cheerleader and seeks revenge after she's rejected.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Aubrey Shea
- Bridget Moretti
- (as Aubrey Peeples)
Maddy Hillis
- Trish Doyle
- (as Madelyn Grace)
Lauren K. Robek
- Betty Locke
- (as Kirsten Robek)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
There's very little build up to the murder and, other than Nina, the characters are all bland and forgettable. The film is also anachronistic. It's supposed to be set in the 80's but looks like it's set in modern times and the main lead dresses like she's from the 40s. Kellie Martin appears in this for like 5 minutes at the end. That's it. No One Would Tell was a decent remake but I'm not really into this one.
It's 1983 in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in California. Bridget Moretti (Aubrey Peeples) is an outsider from a modest family. She is desperate to befriend Kelly Locke, the coolest girl in school, and join the Bobettes. Nina Miller is not into the superficial and narrates as Bridget gets arrested for the murder of Kelly Locke.
It's a Lifetime movie. That's the start and the end of it. The cinematic look is poor. The places look cheap despite this is supposed to be the wealthiest neighborhood. The girls are twenty somethings. From the start, Nina should have the same look. I didn't connect her to the opening of the movie. She has no rooting interest. Peeples needs to go full force right from the beginning. She does have a few nice acting moments. That's probably the only good from this. Mostly, it's all very flat. The ending tries to wrap it up by blaming it on the pressure. That needs to be set up much better. All of this needs to be much better.
It's a Lifetime movie. That's the start and the end of it. The cinematic look is poor. The places look cheap despite this is supposed to be the wealthiest neighborhood. The girls are twenty somethings. From the start, Nina should have the same look. I didn't connect her to the opening of the movie. She has no rooting interest. Peeples needs to go full force right from the beginning. She does have a few nice acting moments. That's probably the only good from this. Mostly, it's all very flat. The ending tries to wrap it up by blaming it on the pressure. That needs to be set up much better. All of this needs to be much better.
Failure is not an option for these girls at Hollybrook High School and peer pressure is overwhelming
This made for TV film was based on a true story so I have to accept that the events outlined actually did occur. There were a lot of caddy and cliquey girls misbehaving and being cruel to one another in an attempt to show who were the alpha girls, and who were the subordinates. Many of these young ladies came from affluent parents and unlimited funds to achieve their lofty goals easily influencing any voting on who gets in and who does not make the cut.
The lead actresses Aubrey Peeples (perpratrator) and Sarah Dugdale (victim) did more than an adequate job and if I did not know that these events actually happened then I would have said the film is hokey. But the events did happen and a number of families lives were ruined all because one young lady felt she was being shunned because she was not as rich as her peers, nor in with the "cheerleaders".
The fate of two of these ladies is life (and death) changing and any young teenagers (female and male) should pay close attention to how hurtful words and actions can be to their classmates.
I give the film a 6 out of 10 IMDB rating
The lead actresses Aubrey Peeples (perpratrator) and Sarah Dugdale (victim) did more than an adequate job and if I did not know that these events actually happened then I would have said the film is hokey. But the events did happen and a number of families lives were ruined all because one young lady felt she was being shunned because she was not as rich as her peers, nor in with the "cheerleaders".
The fate of two of these ladies is life (and death) changing and any young teenagers (female and male) should pay close attention to how hurtful words and actions can be to their classmates.
I give the film a 6 out of 10 IMDB rating
The original was better. The first part is hard to follow - badly directed and unclear with too many characters and girls who kind of look alike. The camera is jerky. The The killing is scary still.
The killer isn't plain enough.
Not great. Just watch the original. An unnecessary remake.
The killer isn't plain enough.
Not great. Just watch the original. An unnecessary remake.
Horrible remake, horrible camerawork, horrible wigs. They took out some of the storyline, which really just deflates any emotion or reasoning behind everything.
Did they blow their entire budget on Kellie Martin? They didn't even have enough extras to fill out "The Bobettes" - did you notice how the group seemed to only have 1 member when the new group joined?
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesBased on the 1984 murder of Kirsten Costas who was killed by her classmate Bernadette Protti in Orinda, California.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe police never check out Bridget's fake babysitting alibi for the night of Kelli's murder, only a private investigator working for Kelli's parents much later on. Her guilt should have been established right away.
- ConexõesReferences Os Caça-Fantasmas (1984)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was O assassinato da cheerleader (2019) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda