Asim, O Vigarista

If we make a comparison with the first film, this film is at its lower level. But the performance of Kivanc Tatlitug and Yilmaz Erdogan was successful. I wish Ata Demirer was more likely to be seen in the film. Can be watched to spend time in cinema.

A lot of Istanbul panorama and a very convincing Saruhan (Kivanc Tatlitug) not sufficient to save the poor screenplay and shooting coupled with bad acting.

Forget everything . If you love Istanbul , panoramic Istanbul views in this movie is fair enough . Musics in the first movie was legend . Music in the second one is not so good as the first. Characters are quite successful. Scenario is well known . But contains lots of little surprises. As mentioned at beginning Istanbul views are enough to forgets the failures.

With all the fuss about ticket price shares for the producers and the fight between cinema operators and the movie makers, I was hoping that Turkish movie makers were atleast trying to defend the good product that they created.

After i watched it on the Netflix after the 2nd week of theatrical release!! I was surprised that this title didn't even come close to the first movie, which was very good.

I didn't even liked the acting except Kivanc Tatlitug's performance. I think, by alone, his portrayel of the the Sari Saruhan was the only good thing with the movie.

Movie relied on the panaromic shots of the Istanbul and the background music so much, it was like a music video.

There was no script, dialouges were so cheesy. I think i laughed at some point and i cannot even remember where it was and who was involved on that scene.

Although there were references to the first part , it was very weak compared to the first film. I was expected to have better than Yilmaz Erdogan. Can be watched for Kivanc Tatlitug performance. Technically there was syncronous shift and vere weak lightening.