O Jovem Ahmed

While the main character could have a used a bit more character development, once we know his goal and his different attempts the suspense becomes riveting.

Knowing quite well the events in France and Belgium of the past year I'd say that the film is a strong realistic representation of fanatism in a miniature setting.

The Dardenne brothers linger, during 80 minutes, to a subject as cleaving as delicate: obscurantism and radicalization. Although the atmosphere is neat, the psychology of the characters is not elaborate enough. Thus, the character of Ahmed interpreted by Idir Ben Addi is definitely not credible: he looks like a harmless kid with a baby face. I can not believe such a child might fool adults so easily. As a matter of fact, the film is essentially based on this character who may then be considered as the keystone of a cinematographic structure. This keystone being defective, the structure collapses! Moreover, the rhythm of the film is a bit sluggish, even if this feeling is possibly due to my global lack of interest for the movie. In short: disappointing! 4/5 of 10.

In Belgium, the teenager Ahmed (Idir Ben Addi) lives with his family and has classes of French and Arabic languages with his teacher Inès (Myriem Akheddiou). However, he has been brainwashed by his Imam Youssouf (Othmane Moumen) with a wrong interpretation of the Koran, despite the warnings of his mother (Claire Bodson). Ahmed decides to kill Inès but fails and is arrested. While under the care of the State, he works at a farm and meets the young Louise (Victoria Bluck), who has a crush on him. But she is not Muslin, and Ahmed scorns her. The radical Ahmed has an agenda and flees from his social worker.

"Le jeune Ahmed", a.k.a. "Young Ahmed" (2019), is a Franco-Belgian production with a simple story of hatred. The movie shows an impressive demonstration of how teenagers may be manipulated and become fanatic by radicals. This is the case of the lead character Ahmed, who received and adopted a wrong interpretation of the Koran and is destroyed by his belief. My only question is why fanatics stay in the Western civilization, instead of returning to their home countries. This is the same case of fanatic racists that praise their mother land. Why they do not move back? My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "O Jovem Ahmed" ("The Young Ahmed")

The Dardenne brothers have once again produced a film that is both simple and powerful.

As the title suggests, this is the story of young Ahmed, a pre-teen who becomes totally involved in Islamism under the influence of an imam who recruits people to kill those who don't think like the Islamists. The film is interesting because it shows how the imam goes about indoctrinating him. The film is interesting because it shows how the imam goes about indoctrinating him, which will disturb, interrogate and question those around him: his school teacher, his family.

The great quality of the film is its script and staging: the story is told through the staging and what we see, i.e. Not through dialogues, intertitles or voice-overs, but through the behavior of the characters, particularly the young man. It's an impressive feat of realism and simplicity, giving every second of the film a sense of tension, a seemingly inescapable race to the finish. As the viewer is constantly from the young man's point of view, but not in his head, he discovers and understands what he is doing with a slight delay. And of course, the Dardennes exclude music from the staging: the film contains none. There's no bias to make us understand or dramatize what we're watching. A kind of empirical method.

Simple, powerful cinema. Prix de la Mise en Scène at the 2019 Cannes Film Festival. It seems obvious.

Even as an agnostic who sees religion very critically, I'm baffled how irresponsibly the producers and directors fuel the fire of bigotry, with such an agenda driven film, in an already toxic political climate. It's rather appalling how the movie tries to intentionally vilify a group of people, by regurgitating the same islamophobic tropes we have been hearing for 20+ years, while failing to maintain any nuance. How can a movie call for open mindedness while being bigoted and close minded itself?