AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,2/10
13 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um homem rapta um dono de uma floricultura e mantém-a cativa numa pequena sala insonorizada num esforço para extrair um segredo obscuro do seu passado.Um homem rapta um dono de uma floricultura e mantém-a cativa numa pequena sala insonorizada num esforço para extrair um segredo obscuro do seu passado.Um homem rapta um dono de uma floricultura e mantém-a cativa numa pequena sala insonorizada num esforço para extrair um segredo obscuro do seu passado.
Christian Blaque Meier
- Jarrod
- (as Christian Meier)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
A lot of people are saying that this film is bad. But as for me, it's kind of enjoyable. But I must admit that the plot is kind of simple and the whole film is kind of normal.
When I watched this film, I kind of wanted to have such a soundproof room. It really seems to be a good idea, especially the environment I'm currently living in. And the house is so cool. A simple house, but a good house.
Overall is that this film isn't that much good, but it's not bad either. At least, we can all learn the truth doesn't come easily and there is another truth under it. I don't know about the others, I really enjoyed the film.
When I watched this film, I kind of wanted to have such a soundproof room. It really seems to be a good idea, especially the environment I'm currently living in. And the house is so cool. A simple house, but a good house.
Overall is that this film isn't that much good, but it's not bad either. At least, we can all learn the truth doesn't come easily and there is another truth under it. I don't know about the others, I really enjoyed the film.
If you are just looking for anything to watch you should give this movie a try. Slow in some parts, and very predictable. Not only that, but the scenerios in the movie are very far fetched, and in my mind could not happen.
This film popped up on Now TV with 1/5 rating. Checked IMDb and again, the rating was low. Regardless, I decided to watch it and I'm glad I did. The film is much better than the ratings suggest; It was quite tense in places with a decent twist, and top notch acting. Take the bad reviews with a pinch of salt and watch this film; you'll be as pleasantly surprised as I was.
Not sure what the terrible reviews are about. This deserves at minimum 5-6/10. It's unique, it's got some thrills and great fight scenes. Give it a try, guaranteed your entertained.
I want you to tell me your name.
Cathy.
My name is Cathy Noland.
One thing is certain. "10X10" breaks all records when speaking of resurrections. The number of times you see one of the two protagonists getting back on their feet again seemed endless. It looked like a newer version of "Night of the living dead". But this time with two stubborn non-zombies playing in it, whose resilience seemed superhuman. At one point I was more concerned with figuring out which of the two had the lowest IQ. Because you can't keep up with the number of stupidities after a while. And finally, I also wondered at the end what statement Lewis (Luke Evans) would give about the whole event when the police show up on his driveway. It's clear I didn't really like this film. And that because of the accumulation of absurdities.
I wanted to see this movie solely because of Luke Evans appearing in it. Personally, I don't think he's a bad actor. He has a certain likable appearance. In my opinion, he didn't act so bad in "No one lives" and "Message from the king". He radiates a calmness and coolness. But here he also seems to have the gift of stupidity. Or they tried to portray him as a real amateur. However, it all starts fairly intriguing. The patience with which Luke observes his future victim Cathy (Kelly Reilly) and the seemingly perfect way in which he carries out the abduction. From then on it started to look more like a slapstick than a nerve-racking thriller. The abduction wasn't perfect, but rather a combination of coincidences and pure luck. But for all we know, he could have been caught red-handed and taken into custody. On the other hand, would that be the case, this would have been a short movie. Speaking of luck-pushing.
The next hilarious moment (intentionally I suppose) is the arrival at his hypermodern, tastefully decorated house. There the victim awaits an ingenious installed, low-noise isolation cell of 10 by 10 meters. Luke turns out to be a regular do-it-yourself shopper because he made it all by himself. He did manage to do that. But apparently, a perfectly functioning garage door was a bit too much. And from then on a psychological cat and mouse game starts that only revolves around revenge. It's best I don't tell more specifics of this less successful film. Contentwise, it's already nothing much. Let alone I'd reveal more. Actually, the content is so limited that they decided to fill it up with irrelevant trivialities and artificial emotional moments. You have to admit that the creators of this film ensured that the pace is high. Only half an hour has passed and poor Cathy is already gagged and screaming anxiously in her cell.
The fact that "10X10" didn't meet my expectations is, in my opinion, not due to the acting itself. That wasn't so bad. It was even reasonably convincing at times. I think that the script is the cause of this disappointment. And this because of a too limited story. How can you make a whopper of a film from a wafer-thin, simplistic plot? Even the Spielberg's and George Lucas's wouldn't figure out how to do that. To be honest, it didn't matter to me anymore who would die in the end. I was already satisfied that at least an acceptable playing time had been provided.
One thing is certain. "10X10" breaks all records when speaking of resurrections. The number of times you see one of the two protagonists getting back on their feet again seemed endless. It looked like a newer version of "Night of the living dead". But this time with two stubborn non-zombies playing in it, whose resilience seemed superhuman. At one point I was more concerned with figuring out which of the two had the lowest IQ. Because you can't keep up with the number of stupidities after a while. And finally, I also wondered at the end what statement Lewis (Luke Evans) would give about the whole event when the police show up on his driveway. It's clear I didn't really like this film. And that because of the accumulation of absurdities.
I wanted to see this movie solely because of Luke Evans appearing in it. Personally, I don't think he's a bad actor. He has a certain likable appearance. In my opinion, he didn't act so bad in "No one lives" and "Message from the king". He radiates a calmness and coolness. But here he also seems to have the gift of stupidity. Or they tried to portray him as a real amateur. However, it all starts fairly intriguing. The patience with which Luke observes his future victim Cathy (Kelly Reilly) and the seemingly perfect way in which he carries out the abduction. From then on it started to look more like a slapstick than a nerve-racking thriller. The abduction wasn't perfect, but rather a combination of coincidences and pure luck. But for all we know, he could have been caught red-handed and taken into custody. On the other hand, would that be the case, this would have been a short movie. Speaking of luck-pushing.
The next hilarious moment (intentionally I suppose) is the arrival at his hypermodern, tastefully decorated house. There the victim awaits an ingenious installed, low-noise isolation cell of 10 by 10 meters. Luke turns out to be a regular do-it-yourself shopper because he made it all by himself. He did manage to do that. But apparently, a perfectly functioning garage door was a bit too much. And from then on a psychological cat and mouse game starts that only revolves around revenge. It's best I don't tell more specifics of this less successful film. Contentwise, it's already nothing much. Let alone I'd reveal more. Actually, the content is so limited that they decided to fill it up with irrelevant trivialities and artificial emotional moments. You have to admit that the creators of this film ensured that the pace is high. Only half an hour has passed and poor Cathy is already gagged and screaming anxiously in her cell.
The fact that "10X10" didn't meet my expectations is, in my opinion, not due to the acting itself. That wasn't so bad. It was even reasonably convincing at times. I think that the script is the cause of this disappointment. And this because of a too limited story. How can you make a whopper of a film from a wafer-thin, simplistic plot? Even the Spielberg's and George Lucas's wouldn't figure out how to do that. To be honest, it didn't matter to me anymore who would die in the end. I was already satisfied that at least an acceptable playing time had been provided.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe house used in the film was featured in the Channel 4 programme Grand Designs. This documented the construction of the house from start to finish.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt 17:42, Lewis (Luke Evans) tells Cathy (Kelly Reilly), that she's being kept prisoner in a room with "four-foot thick concrete walls," yet when he opens the door, it's clear that the walls (at least around the door) can't be more than about six-inches thick.
- Trilhas sonorasCountry of Mine
Written by Beranger
Performed by Beranger (Beranger Gras, Todd James)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is 10x10?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Una verdad inquietante
- Locações de filme
- Atlanta, Georgia USA(Outside scenes)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 2.263
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 1.430
- 15 de abr. de 2018
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 68.260
- Tempo de duração1 hora 28 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente