Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.
Avaliações em destaque
Such a horrible screenplay if anyone values 3 hours pf valuable time refea8n from the movie . Story telling is at the lowest no proper BGM, cheap graphics . Hero has built body eating too much of meat but not investiled time to sharpen his acting skills. Expressions are horrible . Only saviour is 15 mins of prabhas. Better to watch it on OTT moving fast forward button.
I need my 3 hours of vaouable time back wasted my life trustong this horrible movie makers not worth watching....
Location is out of sync to movie, the primary focus is lost in story telling by director. Ecpressionless cast except prabhas.
Dont waste time.
I need my 3 hours of vaouable time back wasted my life trustong this horrible movie makers not worth watching....
Location is out of sync to movie, the primary focus is lost in story telling by director. Ecpressionless cast except prabhas.
Dont waste time.
"KANNAPPA" (2025), a Telugu-language mythological devotional film directed by Mukesh Kumar Singh, attempts to portray the life of Kannappa, a devoted follower of Lord Shiva.
As someone unfamiliar with the legend of Kannappa, I found the film largely unsuccessful in bringing his story to life.
At 3 hours and 3 minutes, the movie is excessively long, but my issue isn't with its runtime-it's with the sluggish pacing, unnecessary vulgarity for a devotional film, forgettable dialogue, and underdeveloped characters.
While the story centers on Kannappa, it also tries to mimic the grandeur of Baahubali, with Kannappa and Nemali resembling Prabhas and Tamannaah's characters from that epic.
Even the villain feels like a recycled version of Baahubali's Kaalikey.
The star-studded cast, including Akshay Kumar, Mohanlal, Kajal Aggarwal, Mukesh Rishi, and Prabhas, is impressive but underutilized. Most actors are sidelined or given lackluster roles.
The visual effects are also feel low quality and literally bad.
Prabhas shines in his scenes, but his entry comes only after two hours, by which point the film has already dragged. The first two hours feel bloated and could easily have been condensed into 40-50 minutes to maintain momentum.
Last 30 minutes are absolutely best but it could be way more better.
Ultimately, Kannappa fails as a family-friendly devotional or mythological film due to its inappropriate content and lackluster execution. I wouldn't recommend it for those seeking a meaningful cinematic experience.
As someone unfamiliar with the legend of Kannappa, I found the film largely unsuccessful in bringing his story to life.
At 3 hours and 3 minutes, the movie is excessively long, but my issue isn't with its runtime-it's with the sluggish pacing, unnecessary vulgarity for a devotional film, forgettable dialogue, and underdeveloped characters.
While the story centers on Kannappa, it also tries to mimic the grandeur of Baahubali, with Kannappa and Nemali resembling Prabhas and Tamannaah's characters from that epic.
Even the villain feels like a recycled version of Baahubali's Kaalikey.
The star-studded cast, including Akshay Kumar, Mohanlal, Kajal Aggarwal, Mukesh Rishi, and Prabhas, is impressive but underutilized. Most actors are sidelined or given lackluster roles.
The visual effects are also feel low quality and literally bad.
Prabhas shines in his scenes, but his entry comes only after two hours, by which point the film has already dragged. The first two hours feel bloated and could easily have been condensed into 40-50 minutes to maintain momentum.
Last 30 minutes are absolutely best but it could be way more better.
Ultimately, Kannappa fails as a family-friendly devotional or mythological film due to its inappropriate content and lackluster execution. I wouldn't recommend it for those seeking a meaningful cinematic experience.
Not worth👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻. 99% of the audience are Prabhas fans and that 20 mins of Prabhas screen presence is good other than that nothing great. Not a great writing, direction and screen play. The budget they put to make this movie is not justified at all. First half of the movie is not even worth 5 mins. Last 20mins of the movie is okay
Wait for OTT if you really want to watch.
Director-1.5/5 BGM-2/5 Screenplay-1/5 Prabhas as Rudra-3.5/5 Mohan babu acting-3/5 Akshay kumar-3/5 Other actors-2/5 Vishnu-1/5
Story-1/5 better to watch the Original Bhakta Kannapa movie.
Big budget movie but lacks in every aspects.
Wait for OTT if you really want to watch.
Director-1.5/5 BGM-2/5 Screenplay-1/5 Prabhas as Rudra-3.5/5 Mohan babu acting-3/5 Akshay kumar-3/5 Other actors-2/5 Vishnu-1/5
Story-1/5 better to watch the Original Bhakta Kannapa movie.
Big budget movie but lacks in every aspects.
Seems like the movie is dubbed using Google translater. Some scenes copied from bahubali, some from 2013 Mahabharat serial, poorly written dialogues. Bad costume choice for actress. Example of how too much budget can spoil a movie.
Such a big cast and none of them do justice. Akshay as Lord Shiva doesn't do justice. Worse is Kajal playing Maa Parvati. Unnecessary romantic angle and projected vulgarity. Some scenes are literally cringe. With this much budget they could have done better VFX, the two eyes showing on lingam could have been projected better.
Though VFX is not as bad as Adipurush 😀. At least forest is green.
Such a big cast and none of them do justice. Akshay as Lord Shiva doesn't do justice. Worse is Kajal playing Maa Parvati. Unnecessary romantic angle and projected vulgarity. Some scenes are literally cringe. With this much budget they could have done better VFX, the two eyes showing on lingam could have been projected better.
Though VFX is not as bad as Adipurush 😀. At least forest is green.
A great cast, a poor screenplay and a disastrous storyline is what brings Kanappa together.
The future generation of Manchu family (Vishnu's kuds) are introduced in the first 10 minutes. Sharat kumar, Mohanlal, Brahmanandam could have done better roles.
The casting is a big minus. Especially Akshay Kumar for Shiva, Vishnu for Thinnada
The direction was oppressed by the senior actors esp Mohan babu, when his character wins some sense until Prabhas/Rudra comes to the screen. Acting is surely an understatement.
The movie flatters boredom right from the start as the script lacked conviction. It was more a natural tour of New Zealand.
Srikalahasti is a legendary tale, they should have focused more on that. But when amateur directors are welcomed, this is what we get best.
The future generation of Manchu family (Vishnu's kuds) are introduced in the first 10 minutes. Sharat kumar, Mohanlal, Brahmanandam could have done better roles.
The casting is a big minus. Especially Akshay Kumar for Shiva, Vishnu for Thinnada
The direction was oppressed by the senior actors esp Mohan babu, when his character wins some sense until Prabhas/Rudra comes to the screen. Acting is surely an understatement.
The movie flatters boredom right from the start as the script lacked conviction. It was more a natural tour of New Zealand.
Srikalahasti is a legendary tale, they should have focused more on that. But when amateur directors are welcomed, this is what we get best.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 147.428
- Tempo de duração
- 3 h 3 min(183 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente