Um boneco é trazido à vida por uma fada, que o atribui a levar uma vida virtuosa para se tornar um menino de verdade.Um boneco é trazido à vida por uma fada, que o atribui a levar uma vida virtuosa para se tornar um menino de verdade.Um boneco é trazido à vida por uma fada, que o atribui a levar uma vida virtuosa para se tornar um menino de verdade.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 13 indicações no total
Joseph Gordon-Levitt
- Jiminy Cricket
- (narração)
Benjamin Evan Ainsworth
- Pinocchio
- (narração)
Lorraine Bracco
- Sofia
- (narração)
Keegan-Michael Key
- Honest John
- (narração)
Giuseppe Battiston
- Stromboli
- (as Guiseppe Battiston)
Jaquita Ta'le
- Sabina
- (narração)
Avaliações em destaque
I'm gonna be honest, I do try my best to tolerate most of the live action remakes. We only got Jungle Book as the only one worth watching, everything else are either decent or just okay. Now the movie is released, I can already see a good reason people will debate this and the 2019 Lion King. The 2022 Pinocchio remake may not be the worst Disney Plus film, but this could be the worst live action Disney remake to date. There are Pinocchio movies out there that do try to find a way to tell the story of the character well. But this is more of a recycled film from the original 1940 one. Despite it does have some of the performances that's fateful to the original film, it had a weak execution with a poorly written story, mediocre characters, overly dark setups, and awful looking visuals. The one thing I'll say the visuals got right is with Pinocchio himself. But for the most part, they can be out of place and most of the designs try way too hard to make animal characters realistic. I mean, we already gotten Ugly Sonic in Chip and Dale. What more do you want to do all that in, Disney Plus? Of course as a painfully pointless live action Disney remake, I recommend to skip this one and stick with the original film. But you know what, let's all be thankful at least we're getting the one by Del Toro at the end of the year. When that gets released, I can guarantee it will be the one you'd want to watch instead. I think Disney should take a break from remaking their classic animated films before they embarrass themselves the more that are made.
Yet another live action adaptation from Disney of one of their beloved cartoon classics. You wonder why they bothered in this instance when most of the characters are CGI anyway with the exception of Tom Hanks, seriously miscast as the eccentric inventor. As usual with these modern-day Disney productions, this is a bland and soulless affair that goes through the motions without ever engaging the senses. It's not quite as long as some of these remakes can be, thankfully, but it fails to stir the senses in every respect and I find it quite telling that the CGI Pinnocchio has less humanity in his eyes than the old animated version.
Robert Zemeckis is a filmmaker responsible for some of the most colorful, ambitious, and uniquely fanciful films of all time. While his Pinocchio remake is certainly not entirely without its effective moments of visual splendor, it pains me to say that he has continued the trend of live-action Disney remakes that somehow manage to take everything about the original and make it significantly worse.
Every character and setting in this is less expressive and vibrant than it was in 1940, completely draining them of the personality and emotional resonance that once made them so memorable and beautiful.
The voice performances are lacklustre, to say the least. Every line of dialogue from Jiminy and Pinocchio is delivered with the exact same tone of voice. There is no variety to emotions, so the stakes are never clear.
Monstro the whale is not built up at all in this version, so any sense that he is a feared, menacing presence is gone. The tension is nonexistent in the finale. The story's other villainous characters are equally disappointing, coming across as goofy and incompetent rather than calculating and manipulative.
Worst of all, there are some narrative changes made in this version, and all of them make the themes of consequence and repentance lose their meaning and weight.
In this film, Pinocchio never has any moments when he learns the negative consequences of lying, stealing, and self-indulgence like he did in the original. He seems to know these things from the get-go, and he only finds himself in the marionette show and on pleasure island because of circumstance rather than by deliberate choice.
Outside of a couple of visually creative scenes, this is a shallow, soulless copy of a once-profound story. Not to mention that it comes across as insultingly disingenuous, as we all know quite well that Disney executives today don't actually know or care about the difference between right and wrong.
Every character and setting in this is less expressive and vibrant than it was in 1940, completely draining them of the personality and emotional resonance that once made them so memorable and beautiful.
The voice performances are lacklustre, to say the least. Every line of dialogue from Jiminy and Pinocchio is delivered with the exact same tone of voice. There is no variety to emotions, so the stakes are never clear.
Monstro the whale is not built up at all in this version, so any sense that he is a feared, menacing presence is gone. The tension is nonexistent in the finale. The story's other villainous characters are equally disappointing, coming across as goofy and incompetent rather than calculating and manipulative.
Worst of all, there are some narrative changes made in this version, and all of them make the themes of consequence and repentance lose their meaning and weight.
In this film, Pinocchio never has any moments when he learns the negative consequences of lying, stealing, and self-indulgence like he did in the original. He seems to know these things from the get-go, and he only finds himself in the marionette show and on pleasure island because of circumstance rather than by deliberate choice.
Outside of a couple of visually creative scenes, this is a shallow, soulless copy of a once-profound story. Not to mention that it comes across as insultingly disingenuous, as we all know quite well that Disney executives today don't actually know or care about the difference between right and wrong.
Went in with the expectation that this would flop - which ironically made the viewing more tolerable
I have set myself certain expectations with regard to Disney productions these days. Disney seems to be on this trajectory that many of us do not like, yet we cannot avert our eyes from what's coming.
The moment Pinocchio was released, I knew this film would be "Disney-fied" (in the modern sense). I suppose certain elements from the 1940 film would need a modern take to appeal to younger audiences, an with that, I note some positive points from the film:
1. The character designs were good. The designs captured the look of the original film, whilst giving them the modern look that modern films demand. In general, the CGI I thought was immaculate and gorgeous.
2. Certain parts of the dialogue made me chuckle. Naturally, dialogue would have to fit the modern context and I thought it was refreshing to hear modern dialogue in a film like this (at times).
3. The voice acting was spot-on. I especially liked Pinocchio and Honest John's voices.
Now of course, this film has many flaws:
1. The story lacks the soul that the original had. It felt more like watching a new spin-off film, as opposed to watching a Pinocchio film.
2. I was surprised how the film removed key elements from the original story. I don't see why this was even necessary.
3. The Blue Fairy just didn't do it for me. It felt very "by the way".
Overall, I think credit should be given to the cast and CGI team.
Though I think the director seems to have lost his way with his string of mediocre films of late.
The moment Pinocchio was released, I knew this film would be "Disney-fied" (in the modern sense). I suppose certain elements from the 1940 film would need a modern take to appeal to younger audiences, an with that, I note some positive points from the film:
1. The character designs were good. The designs captured the look of the original film, whilst giving them the modern look that modern films demand. In general, the CGI I thought was immaculate and gorgeous.
2. Certain parts of the dialogue made me chuckle. Naturally, dialogue would have to fit the modern context and I thought it was refreshing to hear modern dialogue in a film like this (at times).
3. The voice acting was spot-on. I especially liked Pinocchio and Honest John's voices.
Now of course, this film has many flaws:
1. The story lacks the soul that the original had. It felt more like watching a new spin-off film, as opposed to watching a Pinocchio film.
2. I was surprised how the film removed key elements from the original story. I don't see why this was even necessary.
3. The Blue Fairy just didn't do it for me. It felt very "by the way".
Overall, I think credit should be given to the cast and CGI team.
Though I think the director seems to have lost his way with his string of mediocre films of late.
Even if a movie was made by Disney 20 years ago, it would have meant +1 point for many people.
Then Disney grew up and lost his soul.
The Pinocchio movie is not a successful production, despite all the successful actors and actresses in its cast, despite a lot of effort. Because there is no soul in the movie.
The only thing that comes to my mind after watching this movie is; was to watch the Blu-ray of the 1940 version, again made by Disney.
I hope the Netflix/Del Toro version is better.
I'm tired of big companies destroying my childhood memories.
Still, I can't pass without bowing, Benjamin Evan Ainsworth is also very talented in dubbing.
Then Disney grew up and lost his soul.
The Pinocchio movie is not a successful production, despite all the successful actors and actresses in its cast, despite a lot of effort. Because there is no soul in the movie.
The only thing that comes to my mind after watching this movie is; was to watch the Blu-ray of the 1940 version, again made by Disney.
I hope the Netflix/Del Toro version is better.
I'm tired of big companies destroying my childhood memories.
Still, I can't pass without bowing, Benjamin Evan Ainsworth is also very talented in dubbing.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesGeppetto's cuckoo clocks are a collection of Disney characters: Woody and his horse Bullseye from the Toy Story series (starring Tom Hanks) Donald Duck, Roger Rabbit and his wife Jessica kissing (from Robert Zemeckis's previous film Uma Cilada para Roger Rabbit (1988)) Archimedes the Owl (from A Espada Era a Lei (1963)), The Lion King (1994), Princess Aurora and Maleficent from A Bela Adormecida (1959), Dumbo (1941), Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937). The remaining clocks recreate those seen in the original Pinóquio (1940).
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Pinocchio is locked in a cage, he lies to Jiminy Cricket. In one part, he tells Jiminy Cricket he wanted to go to school, which is actually true because he wanted to try out school earlier in the film, despite telling part of the truth, but his nose still grows anyways.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosIn the beginning, Jiminy Cricket floats by the Disney logo, singing along to the "When You Wish Upon a Star" fanfare, and opens the film.
At the end of the film, Jiminy Cricket flies away.
- ConexõesFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Remembering Stephen Hillenburg (2018)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Pinocchio?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Pinocchio
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 150.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 33.731
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 45 min(105 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente