Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaJudge Mablean Ephriam, who presided over "Divorce Court" from 1999-2006 as the first star of the revived version of the show, returns to the courtroom genre with this half-hour series that d... Ler tudoJudge Mablean Ephriam, who presided over "Divorce Court" from 1999-2006 as the first star of the revived version of the show, returns to the courtroom genre with this half-hour series that deals with life and the law.Judge Mablean Ephriam, who presided over "Divorce Court" from 1999-2006 as the first star of the revived version of the show, returns to the courtroom genre with this half-hour series that deals with life and the law.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
I used to watch her all the time and respected her as a judge but now she treats people like dirt she used to show respect but now I have trouble watching her as she treats people like judge Judy who I also refuse to watch because she treats people like dirt, she needs to go back to the way she used to be. She barks at people and doesn't even give them a chance. She is getting just like judge Judy and not listen to what people have to say, Some people don't even get a chance to speak. So take notes from your earlier shows.
Go back to being the kind person you used to be. Then I will return as a viewer
Go back to being the kind person you used to be. Then I will return as a viewer
You are dead wrong to judge this couple. This child is not a lesbian, her parents are. You are wrong. You judged the couple just like sister francis telling a child to go to hell. These popes and fathers have been raping boys for over a hundred years. I don't watch you but caught this one. I couldn't even wait to hear your verdict.
I watched today's show, S4/Ep51, Drive by DUI, on February 6, 2019. I believe Judge Mablean, ruled this case wrong!
The defendant hit the plaintiff's vehicle, which resulted in it being totaled. The plaintiff vehicle is said to have a Bluebook value of $4,800, and repairs were over $6,000.
The plaintiff was awarded the $6,000, to fix the car!
WHAT? WHAT! and WHAT was that , that I heard ? I was yelling at Judge Mablean thru the TV . She made me angry , because she is so wrong on this, judgement .
She may not have liked the defendant, because I don't think the defendant really cared. That is no reason to make a judgment like that, because that is NOT the law!
The plaintiff should be made whole, they should not get a bonanza.
Because the car was totaled and the Blue Book value is less than the repairs, that is what the plaintiff should get. This will make her hole! Amen.
I do not know why Judge Mablean ruled the way that she did, I'm so angry, because of the power that she has and yet she is wrong!
Example for the Judge ... Let's say.... I have a pair of pants that were ruined by you. I take you to court because you didn't want to pay me the $200 that my seamstress said that it would take to repair the pants. Yet, you said that you could buy these pants from the boutique for $50! How much do you think I should be awarded?! Don't forget now, you have proof that the exact same pants can be purchased for $50 (blue book value, 😉), and I have a seamstress who says that it will take $200 to repair the pants. What should I be rewarded?
Example for the Judge ... Let's say.... I have a pair of pants that were ruined by you. I take you to court because you didn't want to pay me the $200 that my seamstress said that it would take to repair the pants. Yet, you said that you could buy these pants from the boutique for $50! How much do you think I should be awarded?! Don't forget now, you have proof that the exact same pants can be purchased for $50 (blue book value, 😉), and I have a seamstress who says that it will take $200 to repair the pants. What should I be rewarded?
First of all Ms. Mablean isn't a judge. She was a prosecutor and she knows the law but she is not a judge. That right there ought to tell you everything.
Secondly these aren't actual plaintiffs. They're actors. The cases might be real in that the producers have gone through actual cases to find some to dramatize on this show but there's no actual trial going on.
And lastly they use really bad actors. Often times you can tell they're acting. They're just not that good.
So watch it as a sit com or as a joke but don't take it seriously.
Secondly these aren't actual plaintiffs. They're actors. The cases might be real in that the producers have gone through actual cases to find some to dramatize on this show but there's no actual trial going on.
And lastly they use really bad actors. Often times you can tell they're acting. They're just not that good.
So watch it as a sit com or as a joke but don't take it seriously.
Every show I watched involving a black and white person, she always sides with the black person. There was only one episode that I I've seen that she didn't. Shame on you judge mablene!
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesTodas as entradas contêm spoilers
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Justice with Judge Mablean have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Locações de filme
- 8660 Hayden Place, Culver City, Califórnia, EUA(Courtroom; Interiors)
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente