AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,6/10
6,7 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA small-time thief reforms after learning about the role played by his grandfather in building a dam.A small-time thief reforms after learning about the role played by his grandfather in building a dam.A small-time thief reforms after learning about the role played by his grandfather in building a dam.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 1 indicação no total
Vijayakumar
- Village Head
- (as Vijay Kumar)
K. Viswanath
- Village Head
- (as K. Vishwanath)
Ilavarasu
- Lingeswaran's Assistant
- (as Illavarasu)
Madhan Bob
- Settu
- (as Madan Bob)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
The only 3 stars is for Rajni.
I see they have given 9.3 starts out of 10. That is not true. I LOVE RAJNI but if this was not a RAJNI movie, then this movie would have got 1 STAR.
Story line 3/10 - The story takes you back to British ruling period and its not that great. It doesn't look like this took place in 1939.
Music 3/10 - nothing great, not even okay. AR Rehman could have done better. The song Mona Mona Gasolina is not catchy. The introduction song is also not great. For Rajni, this should have been THE SONG. Disappoints.
Comedy 3/10 - expected more comedy but except for once in blue moon, no much comedy.
Action 3/10 - not typical Rajni actions Punch Dialog - not one Dialogs - one or two
I would watch Sivaji or Padayappa once again in Movie Theater and would gladly pay $25 (ticket was $25) but not for this movie, I would wait for the DVD.
Not worth First Day First Show. or Last Day Last Show.
Sorry guys
I see they have given 9.3 starts out of 10. That is not true. I LOVE RAJNI but if this was not a RAJNI movie, then this movie would have got 1 STAR.
Story line 3/10 - The story takes you back to British ruling period and its not that great. It doesn't look like this took place in 1939.
Music 3/10 - nothing great, not even okay. AR Rehman could have done better. The song Mona Mona Gasolina is not catchy. The introduction song is also not great. For Rajni, this should have been THE SONG. Disappoints.
Comedy 3/10 - expected more comedy but except for once in blue moon, no much comedy.
Action 3/10 - not typical Rajni actions Punch Dialog - not one Dialogs - one or two
I would watch Sivaji or Padayappa once again in Movie Theater and would gladly pay $25 (ticket was $25) but not for this movie, I would wait for the DVD.
Not worth First Day First Show. or Last Day Last Show.
Sorry guys
I booked tickets and went to ''LUXE CINEMAS'' Phoenix mall Chennai the theater was house full(30 shows run per day in the multiplex all houseful),enjoyed the film cause it was funny and then gets real serious ,and it is totally worth your money.watch this film if you speak Tamil,and if your from India!you'd love it.it has everything every kinda person expects small to old.never mind the negative stuff people tell u about the climax just enjoy the film.:)however DO NOT go to this film during the end days(empty cinemas)you'd get real bored ,this film requires a audience like applaud viewing to enjoy it to the max.i know i sound silly but hell yea this is ''rajini's'' film and being his fan since i was 2 years old (yea 24 months exact)i can tell u just one thing.simply watching him act will suffice your money spent
Watched Lingaa Here is my take.In short the movie showed up lots of flaws as a crash project mega budget movie. Direction I would say 3/10 didn't expect this from Ravi Kumar. Superstar in the flash back portions rocked with his calm and polite acting. The starting 30 mins of the movie I felt really boring and dragging. Introduction song of super star showed too much efforts by Rajini to dance along with the foreigners. But watching the song I felt that he can stop acting as hero and move on doing roles like Big B. VFX was so poor in the movie. Our heroines looked almost alike in their built were just used as dolls nothing much to do. Songs of ARR was disappointing. Except 2 OK kind of duets. Not his best. Overall treat for those who waited long for seeing his presence on screen. But I wouldn't buy superstar's magic in this movie this time -Reviewed by Balachandran Sivakumar
First of all the movie has a brilliant plot, when it enters into Raja Lingeswaran's flashback. But why the movie has such a low rating and box office reception you ask, i'll tell you.
The movie is well cast. Especially Vijayakumar, who does a great job.
The movie falls mainly due to poor direction, cinematography, music and pretty much every technical department fails in this one.
K.S. Ravikumar had a great story but overloads it with a lot usual masala stuff, making it a tough watch.
The stunts reminded me of "Man of steel", with a lot of flying and destruction. Totally cringe worthy.
The director tries hard to bring the style element in, but fails. Because first the movies like Baasha, Padayappa, Arunachalam etc.. set a baseline standard for Thalaivar. Then the bar was set even higher by Shankar's Sivaji with an even more stylish Superstar. KSR tries to bring all these style elements together, failing big time.
Another extremely irritating part of the movie being the portrayal of the heroines. A total Arunachalam-Padayappa rip off. Those kind of heroines were popular then. Times have changed, it's 2015 now and social situations have changed a lot. But the director sadly, is still stuck in the 19th century.
IN A NUTSHELL, I WOULD SAY: The movie would have been better with only the RAJA's sequence, where SUPERSTAR would shine as an ACTOR rather than just a style icon.
Rajini did so well in the RAJA half, it was brilliant by the actor.
And one thing i would criticize on the RAJA's sequence would be that they fail to show the Architectural difficulties of building such a dam.
Other than that the RAJA's plot was just sheer brilliance. Certainly a watchable movie which could have been better.
The movie is well cast. Especially Vijayakumar, who does a great job.
The movie falls mainly due to poor direction, cinematography, music and pretty much every technical department fails in this one.
K.S. Ravikumar had a great story but overloads it with a lot usual masala stuff, making it a tough watch.
The stunts reminded me of "Man of steel", with a lot of flying and destruction. Totally cringe worthy.
The director tries hard to bring the style element in, but fails. Because first the movies like Baasha, Padayappa, Arunachalam etc.. set a baseline standard for Thalaivar. Then the bar was set even higher by Shankar's Sivaji with an even more stylish Superstar. KSR tries to bring all these style elements together, failing big time.
Another extremely irritating part of the movie being the portrayal of the heroines. A total Arunachalam-Padayappa rip off. Those kind of heroines were popular then. Times have changed, it's 2015 now and social situations have changed a lot. But the director sadly, is still stuck in the 19th century.
IN A NUTSHELL, I WOULD SAY: The movie would have been better with only the RAJA's sequence, where SUPERSTAR would shine as an ACTOR rather than just a style icon.
Rajini did so well in the RAJA half, it was brilliant by the actor.
And one thing i would criticize on the RAJA's sequence would be that they fail to show the Architectural difficulties of building such a dam.
Other than that the RAJA's plot was just sheer brilliance. Certainly a watchable movie which could have been better.
This is probably worst tamil movie in Rajini's entire career. No wonder why it was flop. Rajini's movies are big budget movies. This movie was one of the biggest mistake Rajini ever did in his life.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesLingaa name came from rajni's grandson "lingaa danush"
- Erros de gravaçãoLingeswaran character reads the book "The Hero with a Thousand faces" by Joseph Campbell, during train journey that is just before the fight sequence. This story is set in 1939 (before India's independence) but the book was originally published in 1949.
- ConexõesFeatured in For the Love of a Man (2015)
- Trilhas sonorasOh Nanba
Produced by A.R. Rahman
Written by Vairamuthu
Performed by Aaryan Dinesh Kanagaratnam & S.P. Balasubrahmanyam
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Lingaa?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- リンガー
- Locações de filme
- Sagara, Karnataka, Índia(location)
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 1.046.138
- Tempo de duração2 horas 54 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente