u_urcle
Iscritto in data feb 2007
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi7
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni2712
Valutazione di u_urcle
Recensioni8
Valutazione di u_urcle
Finally some new tests and tasks were added!
We have new Staff-members, including an American Seal.
We seem to be in Tasmania, although not entirely sure of that yet.
However, the obviously special treatment granted to 2 female competitors by all of Staff but Ant especially, was annoying.
Episode one Ant berrates all competitors who fails tasks, just like normal considering it trying to replicate army-like conditions.
Except two of the females who seem to struggle a bit more than the rest, they get a cushioned treatment with lift-you-ups and pep-talks.
They get soft starts, less risk (fire and other things) in the challenges and afterwards when they failed they get praise and a complete lack of pressure on what went wrong.
This continues to extreme levels in episode three.
Several competitors fail to report intel during a test, they get scolded for it all of them apart from the 2 with special-status for unknown reasons.
There isn't anything wrong with the treatment per say, if you would allow all competitors the same.
The show hopefully isn't about everyone taking part be granted a participation-medal?
We have new Staff-members, including an American Seal.
We seem to be in Tasmania, although not entirely sure of that yet.
However, the obviously special treatment granted to 2 female competitors by all of Staff but Ant especially, was annoying.
Episode one Ant berrates all competitors who fails tasks, just like normal considering it trying to replicate army-like conditions.
Except two of the females who seem to struggle a bit more than the rest, they get a cushioned treatment with lift-you-ups and pep-talks.
They get soft starts, less risk (fire and other things) in the challenges and afterwards when they failed they get praise and a complete lack of pressure on what went wrong.
This continues to extreme levels in episode three.
Several competitors fail to report intel during a test, they get scolded for it all of them apart from the 2 with special-status for unknown reasons.
There isn't anything wrong with the treatment per say, if you would allow all competitors the same.
The show hopefully isn't about everyone taking part be granted a participation-medal?
Which is more than likely inspired by Drunk History (4years earlier)
That show has far better writing, acting and producing.
(not to mention the adult premise is far more entertaining)
Let's hope that this show studies this prime example, to make a far more entertaining season 2.
That show has far better writing, acting and producing.
(not to mention the adult premise is far more entertaining)
Let's hope that this show studies this prime example, to make a far more entertaining season 2.
You get exactly what you expect given the movies premise and cast, it delivers really well on this for the first 2 thirds of the movie, then for some reason the director got changed and I assume some producer started taking over and we are left with a strange looking turd.
Al in all its still a worthwhile entertaining experience.
Al in all its still a worthwhile entertaining experience.
Sondaggi effettuati di recente
1 sondaggio totale effettuato