The TV series *Beast Games* has drawn a lot of attention for its unique concept and high-stakes challenges, but many viewers argue that it is fundamentally flawed due to its unfair nature. The show prides itself on pitting contestants against one another in intense, supposedly skill-based competitions. However, a closer look reveals that luck and subjective choices play a far greater role than actual talent or ability. Many players advance to the next round not because of their performance but due to random factors or decisions made by other contestants. This undermines the core idea of a fair competition and leaves viewers questioning the legitimacy of the show.
For instance, in several episodes, contestants are eliminated based on group votes rather than objective results. This creates an environment where popularity or alliances determine success, not the individual's merit or ability to excel in the challenge. Moreover, certain games involve unpredictable elements, such as spins, draws, or dice rolls, which make success dependent on sheer chance. This leaves genuinely skilled players vulnerable to elimination simply because they were unlucky, while less deserving participants advance without demonstrating any significant capability.
The reliance on luck and group dynamics in *Beast Games* not only frustrates players but also detracts from the audience's enjoyment. Viewers tune in expecting to see thrilling contests that reward strategy, intelligence, or physical prowess, but instead, they are met with a system that often feels arbitrary and unjust. As a result, the emotional investment in the outcomes dwindles, and the competitive integrity of the show is called into question. Ultimately, while *Beast Games* may entertain on a superficial level, its unfair structure makes it a disappointing experience for those who value fairness and meritocracy in competition-based programming.
