Uno psichiatra americano esamina 22 criminali nazisti durante il processo di Norimberga. La sua passione per Hermann Göring e la sua ricerca ossessiva per comprendere la natura del male lo p... Leggi tuttoUno psichiatra americano esamina 22 criminali nazisti durante il processo di Norimberga. La sua passione per Hermann Göring e la sua ricerca ossessiva per comprendere la natura del male lo portano a un destino oscuro.Uno psichiatra americano esamina 22 criminali nazisti durante il processo di Norimberga. La sua passione per Hermann Göring e la sua ricerca ossessiva per comprendere la natura del male lo portano a un destino oscuro.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 4 vittorie e 14 candidature totali
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Nuremberg' features a gripping narrative, exceptional performances by Russell Crowe and Rami Malek, and dives deeply into historical themes. The film is admired for its intricate depiction of the Nuremberg Trials and its character dynamics. It faces some criticism for historical inaccuracies and pacing problems. Some feel it oversimplifies complex events and characters. Overall, it is regarded as a significant and stimulating historical drama.
Recensioni in evidenza
7.7/10 (Recommend)
First reaction is that this movie deserves to be commended on more than saying the acting was good, the story was heavy, and the pacing was decent. All three of these things ring true, but it was also more than that. It was thought provoking in its humanity, morality, and legality.
So here is my checklist of this film:
Overall, this is a movie I'd recommend seeing in theatres. The sound quality is spectacular and the visuals are great on the big screen. This isn't an award winning film by any stretch of the imagination, but it does its job well enough to say "these were some of the first men to be tried in Nuremberg. We try to humanize them, but in the end they are evil." It might be long for some, but for others it's good entertainment and possibly the beginning of a knowledge quest.
That's it for now. Thanks for taking time to read my review. Happy watching and enjoy the show!
First reaction is that this movie deserves to be commended on more than saying the acting was good, the story was heavy, and the pacing was decent. All three of these things ring true, but it was also more than that. It was thought provoking in its humanity, morality, and legality.
So here is my checklist of this film:
- The acting was good, but I don't think any of it was award winning. The variety of actors chosen for each role made everything feel genuine for the era. Most impressive was Russell Crowe actually speaking German. I assumed it would be him speaking English the entire time, but with a German accent. Beyond the acting feeling authentic the sets felt real too. There wasn't just a ton of close-up shots trying to convince you that you were in war torn Germany. They gave you brief avenues to truly see.
- The story was heavy. You know why they're in Nuremberg, and you know the atrocities that took place. But you know when you don't hear a single crunching of popcorn or rustling of snacks, and there's a collective holding of breath, then you know the director has reeled you in. (Humanity) Emotionally it was more pain and hurt seeing the atrocities and not just tear jerking.
- The pacing was good. Despite its 2.5 hour runtime, the pacing was enjoyable. There's very few moments of down time. I would recommend not going to see the film if you've either been sitting all day, or are tired, or both. I was restless throughout because of both of those things.
- The legality and morality of Nuremberg was not something I ever really considered before. These trials were unprecedented and so the cases had to be built from the ground up. It only shows a partiality of this, but it goes just deep enough to give you a sense.
Overall, this is a movie I'd recommend seeing in theatres. The sound quality is spectacular and the visuals are great on the big screen. This isn't an award winning film by any stretch of the imagination, but it does its job well enough to say "these were some of the first men to be tried in Nuremberg. We try to humanize them, but in the end they are evil." It might be long for some, but for others it's good entertainment and possibly the beginning of a knowledge quest.
That's it for now. Thanks for taking time to read my review. Happy watching and enjoy the show!
Do not listen to the want to be Historians on this site. Was the movie 100% accurate, absolutely not, but neither was Band of Brothers, The Pacific, Fury, etc. However, this movie was very well done and told another side of the Nuremberg trials. My wife is not someone who watches WW2 movies, but she was captivated by this movie. Russel Crowe did a wonderful job playing Goering. Do yourself a favor and go watch the movie and enjoy it. It really is a movie that will stick with you for awhile.
This is a well told story of a little known part of the Nuremberg trials. It holds your attention right from the off with a well paced script and outstanding performances throughout.
Of course there is a little bit of artistic licence but if I want 100% historical accuracy I would read a book or watch a documentary. As a drama though this works very well.
Using some b&w imagery to give more of a sense of the time, in the trial scenes when actual archive footage of the holocaust is used it all adds to the sense of watching something from the time.
There is one small aspected that irked me a little bit where certain characters are given some dialogue to shoehorn some facts and timeline. It felt a little bit as though the audience weren't trusted enough to know some basic facts. That may well be true but I doubt those people wouldn't be in the audience anyway.
That aside it is a very very good film. What makes it stand apart though are the performances from Russell Crowe and Rami Malek in particular. Michael Shannon also shines and although a smaller part there is one scene in particular where Richard E Grant stands out. I would not be surprised to see award nominations coming soon.
Of course there is a little bit of artistic licence but if I want 100% historical accuracy I would read a book or watch a documentary. As a drama though this works very well.
Using some b&w imagery to give more of a sense of the time, in the trial scenes when actual archive footage of the holocaust is used it all adds to the sense of watching something from the time.
There is one small aspected that irked me a little bit where certain characters are given some dialogue to shoehorn some facts and timeline. It felt a little bit as though the audience weren't trusted enough to know some basic facts. That may well be true but I doubt those people wouldn't be in the audience anyway.
That aside it is a very very good film. What makes it stand apart though are the performances from Russell Crowe and Rami Malek in particular. Michael Shannon also shines and although a smaller part there is one scene in particular where Richard E Grant stands out. I would not be surprised to see award nominations coming soon.
One of the best films I've seen in years, and I've seen many. Great performances across the board! I loved it! I simply couldn't stop watching! This one has awards written all over it. Malek, Crowe, and Shannon were amazing! I am so glad I went to the theater to see this film. People should not forget history.
Nuremberg is an entertaining treatment of the trial of top Nazi Hermann Goering. Its aim is to be crowd pleasing but also to touch on serious matters, and it succeeds. Russell Crowe is getting all the attention but Rami Malek worked better for me. John Slattery is commanding. Leo Woodall is attention-getting in a smaller role. He has a scene toward the end of the film that made me cry. There are some inaccuracies. Nuremberg addresses the Nazi persecution of Jews to the exclusion of other victims, including handicapped people, Poles, Soviet POWs, gay people, JWs, and others. But that's a minor complaint about a good movie that manages to both entertain and treat difficult material.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizHermann Göring was put on a strict diet by his jailers so he would be fit to stand trial. He ultimately lost 65 pounds (29.5 kilograms).
- BlooperDouglas Kelley was not fired, discharged from the army and sent home in disgrace. He never spoke to a journalist, or publicly denounced Robert Jackson's ability ahead of Göring's examination.
- Citazioni
Hermann Göring: Just because someone is your ally. Does not mean they are on your side.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
See the current lineup for the 50th Toronto International Film Festival this September.
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 14.247.356 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3.883.295 USD
- 9 nov 2025
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 29.430.562 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 28min(148 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti







