[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

We Are What We Are

  • 2013
  • R
  • 1h 45min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,9/10
22.722
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Bill Sage, Ambyr Childers, and Julia Garner in We Are What We Are (2013)
Behind closed doors, the seemingly whole Parker family is ruled by a patriarch determined to keep his ancestral customs intact. As a torrential rainstorm hits their town, authorities begin to uncover clues that bring them closer to the secret that the Parkers have held closely for years.
Riproduci trailer2: 31
11 video
31 foto
DrammaHorror soprannaturaleOrroreOrrore popolareThriller

I Parker, una famiglia solitaria, trovano minacciata la loro esistenza segreta, costringendo le figlie Iris e Rose ad assumersi responsabilità al di là di quelle di una famiglia tipica.I Parker, una famiglia solitaria, trovano minacciata la loro esistenza segreta, costringendo le figlie Iris e Rose ad assumersi responsabilità al di là di quelle di una famiglia tipica.I Parker, una famiglia solitaria, trovano minacciata la loro esistenza segreta, costringendo le figlie Iris e Rose ad assumersi responsabilità al di là di quelle di una famiglia tipica.

  • Regia
    • Jim Mickle
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Nick Damici
    • Jim Mickle
    • Jorge Michel Grau
  • Star
    • Bill Sage
    • Ambyr Childers
    • Julia Garner
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    5,9/10
    22.722
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Jim Mickle
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Nick Damici
      • Jim Mickle
      • Jorge Michel Grau
    • Star
      • Bill Sage
      • Ambyr Childers
      • Julia Garner
    • 112Recensioni degli utenti
    • 175Recensioni della critica
    • 71Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 5 vittorie e 11 candidature totali

    Video11

    Theatrical Trailer
    Trailer 2:31
    Theatrical Trailer
    We Are What We Are
    Clip 0:49
    We Are What We Are
    We Are What We Are
    Clip 0:49
    We Are What We Are
    We Are What We Are
    Clip 1:03
    We Are What We Are
    We Are What We Are
    Clip 0:58
    We Are What We Are
    We Are What We Are
    Clip 1:09
    We Are What We Are
    We Are What We Are: Clutching At Straws
    Clip 1:29
    We Are What We Are: Clutching At Straws

    Foto31

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 27
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali30

    Modifica
    Bill Sage
    Bill Sage
    • Frank Parker
    Ambyr Childers
    Ambyr Childers
    • Iris Parker
    Julia Garner
    Julia Garner
    • Rose Parker
    Wyatt Russell
    Wyatt Russell
    • Deputy Anders
    Kassie Wesley DePaiva
    Kassie Wesley DePaiva
    • Emma Parker
    • (as Kassie DePaiva)
    Laurent Rejto
    Laurent Rejto
    • Hardware Clerk
    Jack Gore
    Jack Gore
    • Rory Parker
    Kelly McGillis
    Kelly McGillis
    • Marge
    Michael Parks
    Michael Parks
    • Doc Barrow
    Annemarie Lawless
    Annemarie Lawless
    • Arlene Stratton
    Traci Hovel
    Traci Hovel
    • Mrs. Kimble
    Nat DeWolf
    Nat DeWolf
    • Mr. Kimble
    Nick Damici
    Nick Damici
    • Sheriff Meeks
    Vonia Arslanian
    • Emily Meeks
    Larry Fessenden
    Larry Fessenden
    • Bearded Tenant
    Odeya Rush
    Odeya Rush
    • Alyce Parker
    Joel Nagle
    Joel Nagle
    • Mathias Parker
    Reagan Leonard
    • Alyce's Mother
    • Regia
      • Jim Mickle
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Nick Damici
      • Jim Mickle
      • Jorge Michel Grau
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti112

    5,922.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    7sstetsko

    A good remake of a foreign film... that's rare.

    Having seen and quite enjoyed the Spanish original I was a bit concerned about seeing it remade. My concerns were unfounded though as it turns out since, while the director did use the general idea of the original, he did not so much do a remake as a spin off. The setting, characters, general plot, and ending all very significantly deviate from the original, and there is even a detailed back story added which creates, if not sympathy, at least comprehension for the acts this family does.

    The movie itself is beautifully developed to create both a very plausible realism and very well defined characters. It is these characters that are the goal, and the movie does not resort to needless gore to satisfy cruder appetites. The acting is carried off quite flawlessly, and we do find ourselves at least rooting for the children to some degree. All in all it was well worth the watch.

    Would I say it is better than the original? Well, given that they are both very different it would be unfair to pit them against each other directly. I will say I did prefer the original overall as it was first, so it took some of the novelty out of the second, and the original made it more of a sort of very twisted coming of age tale than the second movie did, and I really liked that dimension of it. But if I look at them more as apples and oranges, I would say they both are very well done and each earns its place as a highly recommended piece of work.
    7deloudelouvain

    Very enjoyable movie, didn't get bored for a sec

    I would not call it a horror movie even if there were some bloody parts but it was for sure a good movie. Starting slow and building the suspense up every minute. I really enjoyed watching this movie. I guess they put it in the horror genre because some people might get offended by the story but I wasn't at all shocked. I'm pretty sure there must be sicko's like this in our miserable rotten world. If you want to watch a nice thriller with a good plot then you must for sure watch this movie. You won't regret it. Very underrated movie to me when I see the score he only gets. Compared to some really bad movies that still get like 4 stars it goes beyond my comprehension that this one doesn't even get 6 stars. Well I guess that it's every man to his taste.
    8doug_park2001

    "All this damn rain gets in the bones"

    Dark, slow but steady film about the apparently normal Parker family, who share a macabre secret ritual. Excellent acting and cinematography bring an immediate realism that really carries this film. WARNING: If gore and grossness get to you, stay away. While WE ARE WHAT WE ARE is not just a constant schlock-fest, there is some pretty disturbing stuff here: Short but graphic scenes of an autopsy, etc.

    There's been some debate about whether or not WAWWA is really a horror film, and I would vote a definite "yea" even though the whole mood and atmosphere are different (and better in many ways) than most contemporary horror flicks. There are some elements of suspense, but you know the big "secret" before it's halfway through--the cover also gives a decent hint--so it doesn't exactly work as a mystery. Regardless, the brief flashbacks to the family's ancestors in the 1780s add a great deal.

    Though none of the individual elements here are anything that hasn't been done plenty of times before, WAWWA's whole combination of qualities make it a different experience. It's obviously low budget but still far from being another super-amateurish cheapie. The makers of this film did an excellent job with what they had to work with. There are some blank spots--e.g., the body in the water--and a little stronger sense of place would have been nice. At the same time, it's probably better that they don't explain every little thing away.
    8FilmMuscle

    We Are What We Are for Good or Bad

    A film with such a visible title is surely hinting at the potential themes of the film, right? Well, popularly so, that seems to not be enough for the majority as they're seeking unusually complex films that are basically only made to reach that one significant message to the audience. In my honest opinion, not every film has to blatantly and pretentiously boast its themes and message in order to be considered a masterpiece or, at least, a great film. Upon entering a film, I expect it to entertain and immerse me in a memorable story, coupled with all the effective elements to make it so. If you're commencing this film with that mindset, you're almost guaranteed to have a much better experience. This motion picture tells a remarkable and compelling story about an isolated family who vastly differentiate from the normal citizens- a father and his two daughters and son- suddenly mourning the death of their mother/wife.

    The film does noticeably carry along at a slow pace in its first half as the moviegoer adjusts to the environment and carefully observes this rural atmosphere and its wildly strange inhabitants. Once you familiarize yourself with the family's habits as their backstory unravels, the film begins to kick in. In defense to the flak the film's been receiving from critics who're essentially panning its sluggish pace, I'm forced to question why Terrence Malick's films (the earlier works, especially) are met with such unanimous applause because they perfectly replicate what it means to be excruciatingly slow-paced. With this unfolding plot, the pace eventually picks up in its latter half (unlike Malick's persistence in meddling pace), and we're ultimately greeted, for lack of a better term, with a remarkably tense ending, which serves as a pinnacle in conclusions. Although the film is frankly plagued by an element of predictability due to the way some scenes are shot, an edge of unpredictability is highly prevalent throughout the finale. The crowd encounters several twists and turns along the way until all has been exposed and the conflict hits its marvelous peak. Basically, this is one of those movies that are definitely redeemed by the exceptional manner in which the story wraps up.

    By the way, this is, at the end of the day, a horror film in essence, and I greatly appreciated the film's preference of storytelling rather than the mindless path of excessive gore and pointless violence, that which infests the horrendous contemporary horror flicks. Admittedly, I found myself losing interest in the film's events and ensuing mystery until it finally reaches that sweet spot halfway through the story (as previously mentioned). In addition, it's superbly acted with the whole cast terrifically fitting into their roles and the father perfectly conveying that look of menace, intimidating everyone around him with a low-pitched, frightening voice and a werewolf-like, unshaven face. However, I'll have to mention just how irritated I was by the amount of mumbling that was occurring during the beginning. It was extremely difficult to grasp a single word out of their mouths, and I can't possibly stress just how much I hate actors' decisions to mumble. Understandably, they're often found in miserable positions. Regardless, without subtitles, you're left to struggle with understanding as the tale progresses.

    Furthermore, the cinematography is undeniably beautiful at times and then, it also serves well when it comes to telling the story with that hint of tension and suspense (the primary goal of a cinematographer, in the first place, before going for fancier shots), complementary to the mise-en-scène as well. The director's consistent use of rack focusing undoubtedly contributes to the outstanding execution of some specific scenes, especially the grand finale. In the end, the film isn't fascinatingly complex or considerably intelligent, but it absolutely works in terms of plot, camera-work, and performances. Though the music disappointedly isn't striking and feels fairly bland and generic (removing potentially greater suspense and eeriness from the final product), We Are What We Are will likely stick in your mind due to the completely unexpected and pulsating intensity that erupts as it nears the finish mark.
    7claudio_carvalho

    Depressing and Creepy

    The Parker family is fasting following and old family tradition. When the matriarch, Emma Parker (Kassie DePaiva), goes to a hardware store in the nearby small town during a rainstorm, she does not feel well, has an accident and dies. Her husband Frank Parker (Bill Sage), who is the owner of a trailer camping area, grieves her death and forces her older daughter Iris (Ambyr Childers) to assume the responsibility for keeping the family tradition, feeding them and nursing her teenage daughter Rose (Julia Garner) and her young brother Rory (Jack Gore). He also gives Emma's journal to Rose with the history of their family to learn their traditions.

    Meanwhile Sheriff Meeks (Nick Damici) and Deputy Anders (Wyatt Russell) are investigating cases of missing persons in the skirts of the town. Doc Barrow (Michael Parks), who lost one daughter that has disappeared, is carrying out Emma's autopsy and finds an important discovery that will connect the missing cases with the Parker family. What is the tradition of the Parker family?

    "We Are What We Are" is a depressing and creepy remake of a 2010 Spanish movie "Somos lo que hay". The story is developed in slow pace in a depressive atmosphere and the acting is top-notch. Unfortunately the screenplay discloses the mystery too soon but the gore conclusion is gruesome and hard to be seen. My vote is seven.

    Title (Brazil): "Somos o Que Somos" ("We Are What We Are")

    Altri elementi simili

    Siamo quello che mangiamo
    5,7
    Siamo quello che mangiamo
    The Loved Ones
    6,6
    The Loved Ones
    I bambini di Cold Rock
    5,9
    I bambini di Cold Rock
    Intruders
    5,4
    Intruders
    The Eyes of My Mother
    6,2
    The Eyes of My Mother
    Excision
    6,1
    Excision
    La metamorfosi del male
    5,9
    La metamorfosi del male
    Come Out and Play
    4,8
    Come Out and Play
    Kristy
    5,9
    Kristy
    La casa chiusa
    6,1
    La casa chiusa
    Let Us Prey
    5,8
    Let Us Prey
    Tomato Red
    5,7
    Tomato Red

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      Based on the screenplay "Somos Lo Que Hay" by Jorge Michel Grau.
    • Blooper
      The dungeon door's window bars were removed each time the camera looked through it. Four wide vertical bars were visible in approach and open door shots.
    • Citazioni

      Marge: I heard somebody down in the shed earlier.

      Iris Parker: It must've been Daddy. He's the only one allowed down there. Ever.

      Marge: Well, it sounded like a girl crying.

      Iris Parker: I don't know what you think you heard, but you must be mistaken.

    • Connessioni
      Featured in At the Movies: Cannes Film Festival 2013 (2013)
    • Colonne sonore
      I'll Pretend
      Written and Performed by Glen Morris

      Courtesy of Fervor Records Vintage Masters

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti

    • How long is We Are What We Are?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 25 ottobre 2013 (Regno Unito)
    • Paesi di origine
      • Stati Uniti
      • Francia
    • Sito ufficiale
      • Official Twitter
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Somos lo que hay
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Margaretville, New York, Stati Uniti(town and surrounding areas)
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Belladonna Productions
      • Memento Films International
      • Paradise City
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 81.381 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 13.727 USD
      • 29 set 2013
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 159.047 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      1 ora 45 minuti
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby Digital
    • Proporzioni
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.