Tribunal Justice

I left a negative review too hasty! I'm sorry judge A. Made me really eat my words.

Judge Aker is an awesome judge. She does get me fired up at times, but so does judge Judy, and I love her! Forgive me for speaking too soon. I think you are a very fair judge. And beautiful as well.

Judge Dimango always looking smoking hot. I love the way she talks! She's just fun to watch. Hair and makeup always flawless.

Judge Levy I love how he hates hates hates a crook! 😂 He gets so fired up. Love cheering him on as always!

My favorite part of the show is the deliberation at the end. Hearing what all the judges really think!

I look for new episodes every day. Great show!

After Tanya Acker and Patricia DiMango left Hot Bench in 2022, they would join alongside Adam Levy and former Judge Judy bailiff Byrd in Tribunal Justice.

Like its sister show Judy Justice, Tribunal Justice is similar to Hot Bench (except unlike Judge Judy, HB is still going) since its streaming, meaning that they usually focus on just 1 case, diving further into the cases in-depth.

So, if you liked and missed Acker and DiMango in Hot Bench, then you'll get a chance to see them again in Tribunal Justice!

I already loved Judges Tanya and Patricia, and now I'm pleased to see Judge Adam Levy. Each jurist brings great styles of examining the litigants. I do enjoy watching Adam Levy catch liars and call out inconsistencies the way he does. Starting with Judge Judy, who my grandmommy and I watched decades ago, I've come to enjoy certain personalities on court shows. I only ever liked, no, loved Judge Judy to this day, and I did fall in love with Tanya Acker and Patricia DiMango years ago. And I love Adam too now. I find the colorful personalities of the judges entertaining and enjoyable. I think the judges reach fair and just decisions in their collaborative efforts. I think it's entertaining. But I am a bit biased. At age 56, I've spent almost half my life watching and loving Judge Judy, and anything she endeavors I'm interested in. Also, this show is also great.

Having worked for the court, I know how civil cases can play out. These three people are NOT judges. They are arbitrators. Levy needs to dial back the attitude. He has one trait that is just as annoying as his mother. Not looking at the litigant when he is unleashing his vitriol. His eyes trail back and forth as he's "lecturing" a litigant or litigants on what a piece of crap he thinks they are. I do like the discussion about the merits of the case. It's more informative than the browbeating that went on earlier. The program is interesting in a reality show kind of way, but it has little to do with the actual goings on in a court of law.

I just started watching this show this past weekend and I absolutely love it. No matter whether it's real or fake it fun to see a different take on having a panel of 3 judges with different points of view in how they go about deciding guilt or innocence. So if the cases brought before them seem a bit outlandish at times but at the same time I stop and think and remind myself that there's enough crazy people out there to get caught up in crazier situations. I also love how when they go to deliberate how they all offer their own point of view and they listen to one another explain their way of thinking. Sometimes their all on the same page and sometimes their not.