La lacrima del diavolo

I look forward to Natasha Henstridge in Lifetime or Hallmark movies - she makes it a bit more of an A list cast. She plays an FBI agent investigating a mass shooting who threatens to do it again unless he is paid some ransoms. Strangely they seem to want to negotiate with terrorists. Tom Everett Scott another better than Lifetime actor plays an expert on documents who can help find the criminals but has retired because of some traumatic incident involving his kid.

This is a better than usual Lifetime thriller especially since mass shootings are in the forefront of the news these days. Liked the ending - neat and feel good.

This is a decent although unremarkable thriller in which the FBI recruits an ex-agent who is an expert in verifying and examining documents. He has a lot of personal issues including an ex-wife who wants the kids and a son who is still suffering the after-effects of being terrorized by a murderer he had put in prison several years before.

Although director Norma Bailey does a decent job in all departments and the actors handle their roles competently, the movie itself soon falls into fairly predictable patterns and scenes and the potentially interesting idea of showing how the analysis of documents and profiling of killers actually works is reduced to a few gadgets and flashes of insight. Instead we are distracted by family drama.

I cannot tell if the poverty in the script is due to Jeffrey Deaver's novel or to Ron Hutchinson's adaptation. I am not familiar with Mr. Deaver's works and the two other movies I have seen written by Mr. Hutchinson -- who also co-produced this TV-movie -- have not been very interesting, so I suspect it is not Mr. Deaver's responsibility. However, whoever is responsible, unless you are a fan of the genre, you can give this a miss.

First off, this is a typical Lifetime movie. Both the acting and dialogue is so-so. That having been said, I don't regret seeing this film.

This film is based off a book by Jeffrey Deaver and does maintain his use of a twist and a sinister villain. Like I said, the film isn't top notch but for fans of Deaver's, his story elements aren't betrayed. I also thought the subplot about the main character's custody battle and the reasons he didn't want to go back to helping law enforcement were well handed.

I guess what I'm saying is the core is good, even if the execution is not.

"He will kill again at 12 each day for the next 2 days. I am wanting 20 million in cash." When a man known only as "The Digger" opens fire in a train station many are left dead. The only clue the FBI has is a hand written letter with demands on it. Agent Margurete (Henstridge) needs help analyzing it and the best is retired specialist Kincaid (Scott). I was a little weary of this at the outset. The actors I like, but it is a "Lifetime" movie, and that kinda scared me. After about 10 min I was hooked and was really shocked at how good this movie was. Good acting and good story telling made this one tense all the way through. Not only is it one of the best "Lifetime" movies I have seen, it's also one of the better movies coming out this week. Without trying to give anything away, this is also the first "Lifetime" movie I have seen where the man is portrayed as a good guy. Way to go. The only complaint I had is the ending, but being the type of movie this is it is to be expected. Just a little too anti-climatic for my liking. Other then that I really enjoyed this. Overall, very entertaining and tense, a very good choice. I give it a B+.

Would I watch it again? - I might, to catch clues I may have missed.

*Also try - Lies In Plain Sight & The Zodiac

The strange thing is being a bad movie, with awful dialogue, with very predictable twist, it is not easy to admit than it is real bad. In my case, for the simpathy for Tom Everett Scott and for the nice subplot of custody. For fans, I suppose, it can be the perfect film. But, sure, an easy thriller/ policier can be a reasonable definition.