VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,3/10
38.614
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un artista si trasferisce nella valle dell'Hudson e inizia a sospettare che il suo matrimonio abbia un'oscurità sinistra, che rivaleggia con la storia della sua nuova casa.Un artista si trasferisce nella valle dell'Hudson e inizia a sospettare che il suo matrimonio abbia un'oscurità sinistra, che rivaleggia con la storia della sua nuova casa.Un artista si trasferisce nella valle dell'Hudson e inizia a sospettare che il suo matrimonio abbia un'oscurità sinistra, che rivaleggia con la storia della sua nuova casa.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
First of all, don't expect a horror movie, this is more of a supernatural thriller with a creepy atmosphere.
I saw it on the release date, and it had already gotten pretty negative reviews. On top of that I don't expect a whole lot from Netflix movies, so I went in with very low expectations. I was pleasantly surprised.
The film is intriguing, it works on the drama and mystery level, and though I'm not easily scared, I would say that the few horror elements in the film are pretty well done. The acting is solid all around, and the direction is capable.
The thing is, and I'm guessing this is due to the fact that it's based on a book, the film tries to do too much. There are characters (Willis) and plot lines (Catherine's bulimia) that you imagine are important in the book, but fail to make the kind of impact on the film that they were clearly meant to. It's hard to go into detail without spoiling, but in short more emphasis on characters and main plot lines would have served the movie well. I have no doubt the source material is fantastic, but the movie could have done better if some of it had just been left in the book.
Which brings us to the two hour run-time, some would argue that it would have been better if it was shorter, I would argue the that the length is what makes the film (mostly) work in the end.
To sum up, a decent supernatural thriller, albeit with a bit too much going on.
I saw it on the release date, and it had already gotten pretty negative reviews. On top of that I don't expect a whole lot from Netflix movies, so I went in with very low expectations. I was pleasantly surprised.
The film is intriguing, it works on the drama and mystery level, and though I'm not easily scared, I would say that the few horror elements in the film are pretty well done. The acting is solid all around, and the direction is capable.
The thing is, and I'm guessing this is due to the fact that it's based on a book, the film tries to do too much. There are characters (Willis) and plot lines (Catherine's bulimia) that you imagine are important in the book, but fail to make the kind of impact on the film that they were clearly meant to. It's hard to go into detail without spoiling, but in short more emphasis on characters and main plot lines would have served the movie well. I have no doubt the source material is fantastic, but the movie could have done better if some of it had just been left in the book.
Which brings us to the two hour run-time, some would argue that it would have been better if it was shorter, I would argue the that the length is what makes the film (mostly) work in the end.
To sum up, a decent supernatural thriller, albeit with a bit too much going on.
What a bizarre, curious movie this was, classified on Netflix as a horror, it is most definitely not a horror, I'd place it more in the thriller genre.
Production values are superb, and the acting is first rate, both James Norton and Amanda Seyfried put in first rate performances, the pair are superb.
Each scene where I saw Norton's white vest popping through the top of his jumper, I saw Sidney Chambers, British fans will of course be familiar with Granchester.
Despite the amazing acting, and the very atmospheric start, I find it hard to forgive the ending, this is a movie in the category of, how not to end a film, it sucks, it's unoriginal, and the movie deserved more.
Overall, very well acted, good story, a poor ending, it's worth a look, 6/10.
Production values are superb, and the acting is first rate, both James Norton and Amanda Seyfried put in first rate performances, the pair are superb.
Each scene where I saw Norton's white vest popping through the top of his jumper, I saw Sidney Chambers, British fans will of course be familiar with Granchester.
Despite the amazing acting, and the very atmospheric start, I find it hard to forgive the ending, this is a movie in the category of, how not to end a film, it sucks, it's unoriginal, and the movie deserved more.
Overall, very well acted, good story, a poor ending, it's worth a look, 6/10.
This is a good horror/mystery movie but it could've been much better. It has a beautiful gothic atmosphere but it's not scary at all so if you're expecting a creepy horror film just skip it, it's does great with respect to the mystery part though. The story is really interesting, provoking and has a great implied message but the movie fails in portraying it, the screenplay has holes and feels weak sometimes. It's also unnecessarily long and boring at certain moments. Things Heard & Seen is neither great nor bad, give it a try if you like this genre and forget about it the next day.
This movie doesnt know what genre, plot or story its trying to tell. The characters are all horribly written and you will not care for any of them. The storyline is a mess and the ending feels like they just wanted to wrap up filming. To avoid.
I agree with the reviewer who wrote it builds up to nothing. For the 3/4 part or so it looked more or less like a decent movie, although there was absolutely no suspense, but then?
Like they ran out of money and just ended it. Somehow. :)
Like they ran out of money and just ended it. Somehow. :)
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFilming took place over a 34-day period during the fall of 2019 in New York's Hudson Valley, where the story is also set. Forty local crew members were hired and over 500 background extras were booked through Hudson Valley Casting. Tech City (former IBM HQ) in the town of Ulster was rented for months as the qualified production facility and for administrative office space. Over 4,400 rooms were booked at regional hotels and the local spend was north of $13 million. Locations were used throughout the region thanks to the talent of (location manager) Kurt Enger and his crew, including Myna Joseph. Featured locations in the film were found in Millerton, Red Hook, Tivoli, Kingston, Palenville, and Ulster, in Dutchess and Ulster Counties NY.
- BlooperThe $50 bill in the envelope for Cole has a picture of Andrew Jackson on it.
- Citazioni
Eddie Vayle: You know what they say about temptation. Easiest way to kill it is to just give in.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Flix Forum: Things Heard & Seen (2025)
- Colonne sonoreFools in Love
Written and Performed by Joe Jackson
Courtesy of A&M Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Things Heard & Seen?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- La apariencia de las cosas
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 1 minuto
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was L'apparenza delle cose (2021) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Rispondi