VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
54.241
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Rifiutandosi di credere alla sua storia sui mostri delle caverne, le autorità costringono l'unica sopravvissuta di un'esplorazione speleologica finita terribilmente male a tornare nelle cave... Leggi tuttoRifiutandosi di credere alla sua storia sui mostri delle caverne, le autorità costringono l'unica sopravvissuta di un'esplorazione speleologica finita terribilmente male a tornare nelle caverne dove nuovamente accade qualcosa di sinistro.Rifiutandosi di credere alla sua storia sui mostri delle caverne, le autorità costringono l'unica sopravvissuta di un'esplorazione speleologica finita terribilmente male a tornare nelle caverne dove nuovamente accade qualcosa di sinistro.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Shauna Macdonald
- Sarah Carter
- (as Shauna MacDonald)
Josh Dallas
- Greg
- (as Joshua Dallas)
Recensioni in evidenza
For a sequel this is surprisingly good. The shock factor is gone admittedly but the filming is not as dark so you see more of the creatures and it's probably even gorier than the first one too.
If you enjoyed the first one then really there is no reason you won't like this as well.
THE DESCENT 2 is like FINAL DESTINATION 2 or WRONG TURN 2 or about 100 other horror sequels, in that we get more of the same and it's usually not as good as the original. In this case, the editor of the first movie is the director of this one, and clearly wasn't given the greatest script to work with. But he does about as good a job as anyone in his position probably could. A rescue party goes into the caves to find the missing girls from the first movie, and they drag a shell-shocked Sarah from the first movie along with them. We do not have to wait long for the cave creatures to show up and start eating the would-be rescuers. Since we have been through this once already, there is far less shock value this time around. There are, however, a couple of kick-ass fight scenes and the film is perhaps even bloodier than the original. Accents are all over the place, as it was filmed in England and not in Appalachia, where it is supposedly set. In truth, Part 2 is not a must-see unless you are dying to see what happened to Sarah.
Somehow, they've managed to crap all over the mystery and wonder of the first film. I wouldn't have thought that possible, but here's two hours worth of what basically amounts to the same movie with different angles. There's a fine line between horror and annoyance, and the difference is evident between the original film and this sequel. The first had some great character development, witty dialogue, an intriguing plot. All of those things have been substituted for B-movie versions of same. Huge plot holes, impossible scenarios, expositional dialogue, and an ending that makes both films seem pointless. Don't even get me started on why there is light in some of the caves deep underground.
A Sheriff suspects that Sarah has killed her friends and forces her to return to the caves with a rescue team.
Even after the UK ending of The Descent, Sarah still manages to get out but is forced back to the uncharted underground to help locate her five missing companions.
I'll try not reminisce over the amazing first film, there appears to be some mixed comments on The Decent: Part 2. If you did like The Descent, for the record the follow up even with the tantalising story setup it is sadly a huge disappointment.
Surprisingly the excellent editor Jon Harris gives a poor directorial debut. Even with some of the strong original cast including Shauna Macdonald and Natalie Mendoza, they simply can't save J Blakeson and James McCarthy poor screenplay. On board is Eden Lake's writer James Watkins and support from cinematographer Sam McCurdy (The Descent, Dog Soldiers, Doomsday to name a few).
It feels and looks like a poor mans interpretation of the Descent, it's not a straight to video production but its almost there, awful dialogue, little if any character development, no suspense and poorly executed scares and that's just touching the surface. The film looks rushed, the lighting, sets, sound, direction, everything on screen looks cheap and nasty. It lacks the grittiness of the first and the Crawler's don't look as menacing or a realistic.
It is only worth watching to see how film with such great talent can go so wrong.
Even after the UK ending of The Descent, Sarah still manages to get out but is forced back to the uncharted underground to help locate her five missing companions.
I'll try not reminisce over the amazing first film, there appears to be some mixed comments on The Decent: Part 2. If you did like The Descent, for the record the follow up even with the tantalising story setup it is sadly a huge disappointment.
Surprisingly the excellent editor Jon Harris gives a poor directorial debut. Even with some of the strong original cast including Shauna Macdonald and Natalie Mendoza, they simply can't save J Blakeson and James McCarthy poor screenplay. On board is Eden Lake's writer James Watkins and support from cinematographer Sam McCurdy (The Descent, Dog Soldiers, Doomsday to name a few).
It feels and looks like a poor mans interpretation of the Descent, it's not a straight to video production but its almost there, awful dialogue, little if any character development, no suspense and poorly executed scares and that's just touching the surface. The film looks rushed, the lighting, sets, sound, direction, everything on screen looks cheap and nasty. It lacks the grittiness of the first and the Crawler's don't look as menacing or a realistic.
It is only worth watching to see how film with such great talent can go so wrong.
In the first The Descent movie, where Sarah was the only survival of a caving expedition, Neil Marshall (director and writer) chose to keep the ending open to different interpretations of the real cause of what happened. For me it is that open end that gave an added value to the first episode. Unfortunately someone, probably commercialism and money, decided to create a sequel. In any sequel the storyline is simplified to a brainless horror movie with a fairly guessable storyline.
There is also nothing to say about good acting or the development of characters.
If you have seen The Descent this sequel is certainly not worth it. But if you want to see a brainless horror with some jump-scenes it is acceptable.
There is also nothing to say about good acting or the development of characters.
If you have seen The Descent this sequel is certainly not worth it. But if you want to see a brainless horror with some jump-scenes it is acceptable.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDirector Jon Harris had the crawlers slightly redesigned for this sequel. Apart from darker skin tones with better camouflage ability, they look more feral with more scars, and have more deformities to suggest years of inbreeding. Additionally, they have several rows of teeth like a shark, for ripping out flesh.
- BlooperThis film is set in 2005, right after the first one. At 1 hour, 2 minutes, Rios records her video message to her daughter on a Nokia N81 phone, which wasn't released until 2007.
- Curiosità sui creditiWhile in the first film the opening credits resembled a flashlight passing over and illuminating them, in this one, the opening credits appears as if a passing light were shining past them onto the audience.
- ConnessioniFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Horror Movies Ruined by Terrible Endings! (2017)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- El descenso: parte 2
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 7.048.886 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti