[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Il collezionista di occhi

Titolo originale: See No Evil
  • 2006
  • VM14
  • 1h 24min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,1/10
30.194
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Glenn Jacobs, Christina Vidal, Luke Pegler, and Samantha Noble in Il collezionista di occhi (2006)
Home Video Trailer from Lionsgate
Riproduci trailer0:48
1 video
63 foto
AzioneOrroreSlasher HorrorThriller

Un gruppo di delinquenti viene mandato a pulire il Blackwell Hotel. Non sanno che lo psicopatico solitario Jacob Goodnight si è rintanato nell'hotel in decomposizione.Un gruppo di delinquenti viene mandato a pulire il Blackwell Hotel. Non sanno che lo psicopatico solitario Jacob Goodnight si è rintanato nell'hotel in decomposizione.Un gruppo di delinquenti viene mandato a pulire il Blackwell Hotel. Non sanno che lo psicopatico solitario Jacob Goodnight si è rintanato nell'hotel in decomposizione.

  • Regia
    • Gregory Dark
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Dan Madigan
  • Star
    • Glenn Jacobs
    • Christina Vidal
    • Michael J. Pagan
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    5,1/10
    30.194
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Gregory Dark
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Dan Madigan
    • Star
      • Glenn Jacobs
      • Christina Vidal
      • Michael J. Pagan
    • 206Recensioni degli utenti
    • 142Recensioni della critica
    • 17Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 3 candidature totali

    Video1

    See No Evil
    Trailer 0:48
    See No Evil

    Foto62

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 56
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali22

    Modifica
    Glenn Jacobs
    Glenn Jacobs
    • Jacob Goodnight
    • (as Kane)
    Christina Vidal
    Christina Vidal
    • Christine
    Michael J. Pagan
    • Tye
    Samantha Noble
    • Kira
    Steven Vidler
    Steven Vidler
    • Williams
    Cecily Polson
    • Margaret
    Luke Pegler
    Luke Pegler
    • Michael
    Rachael Taylor
    Rachael Taylor
    • Zoe
    Penny McNamee
    Penny McNamee
    • Melissa
    Craig Horner
    Craig Horner
    • Richie
    Mikhael Wilder
    • Russell
    Tiffany Lamb
    Tiffany Lamb
    • Hannah
    Sam Cotton
    Sam Cotton
    • Young Jacob
    Cory Robinson
    Cory Robinson
    • Blaine
    Zoe Ventoura
    Zoe Ventoura
    • Eyeless Woman
    Annalise Woods
    Annalise Woods
    • Young Girl
    • (as Annaliese Woods)
    Tim McDonald
    Tim McDonald
    • Officer 1
    Trent Huen
    • Officer 2
    • Regia
      • Gregory Dark
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Dan Madigan
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti206

    5,130.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    7Daelock

    Good, B-movie Fun

    This, ladies and gentlemen, is truly a modern B-movie. The dialog is stilted and delivered with wooden rigidity, the premise is predictable (there are a few decent twists) and characters remain 2D for most of it. And yet there is a certain...charm. WWE wrestler Kane brings to life the sick, twisted monster of a man with a lot of pathos (though it is somewhat like his character that he's been playing around ten years) and so I'll find it quite amusing when people say it's "not much of a reach for him," but Glen Jacobs is, apparently, quite the nice guy, so actually it is. In any event, he's cast perfectly as the hulking brute and the deaths are suitably over the top (Jason would be proud), but I heard at least four applause breaks for four different kills scenes. Frankly go into this movie thinking that you'll have some fun and a gorefest, oh it is QUITE the gorefest. The R-rating IS richly deserved and I actually got a little nauseous during some of the more graphic times. In any event, a very, very fun, but fairly bad, movie.
    sandman33

    I just saw it and...

    I remember way back when I was a manager at Toys R Us I had to watch this sad, pathetic "Personnel Management" training video. It lectured that whenever you say a criticism, you should ALSO include a compliment. This movie reminded me of that principal.

    First off, it's not all that bad, actually. Kane makes a pretty good "Silent Psycho," and the character's back story is decently developed in a series of B&W flashbacks. His POV shots are nicely distorted, and, unlike the vast majority of psycho killers in film today, is not simply an "unstoppable force." Kane actually manages to find a character in there. (A very minimal character, to be sure, but there is a TINY bit there more than just a "Thing-That-Kills-People-For-No-Reason.") On the whole, however, the acting in the film is best described as "not-TOTALY-sucking." (I'm reminded of that Simpsons episode where Groundskeeper Willie sings a song that goes "Wouldn't it be adequate?" Yes, the acting here is, indeed, adequate, but only just. To be fair the actors aren't really being asked to act here, it's enough that they are clichéd stereotypes.)

    The art direction is generally good, if very, very derivative of other films like "Hostel" and the "Saw" series. It goes a bit over the top with the filth and grime at times, but for this kind of movie, that isn't really a problem from an aesthetic standpoint. It is a problem from a plot standpoint. The people are there (we learn this in the first 10 minutes, so don't worry, it isn't a spoiler) to do public service by cleaning an old, historic building. Unfortunately, the sheer SCALE of the mess at this building would take that guy from "Dirty Jobs" and a full hazmat crew a month to deal with. The place is practically a toxic waste dump. There are a few problems (which I will NOT detail in the interest of avoiding spoilers) with the set and set dressing that are later revealed as not problems at all, but rather plot points. Those I can forgive.

    The film delivers on what it promises: A creepy, disgusting setting with a creepy, violent psycho stalking creepy, dysfunctional people, with absolutely minimal story, plot, acting, direction, sense, or purpose to get in the way. It's almost Ed-Woodian in it's gleeful disregard of knowledge of it's own lack of ambition to greatness. (If I may be allowed to construct a sentence that convoluted without being arrested by the Language Police.)

    I had very few expectations from this film (Hell, after all, it IS a WWE film...), and the only thing that really disappointed me is the same thing I am disappointed by in most horror films. It was very, very predictable. At one point I was sitting there going, "...and now someone runs in and saves them," only to be rewarded by just that.

    In the end, if you can accept the idea that a correctional institute would send a co-ed group of mixed violent and non-violent offenders to do heavy-duty industrial cleanup in street clothes and sandals for a weekend with only 2 chaperons, then nothing else the film asks you to accept will be much of a problem for you.
    5Fenris Fil

    It's honest at least, just not very good

    Okay, this is a B-Movie, Horror by numbers. The good news is it doesn't try or pretend to be anything else. So it just concentrates on being the best B-Movie, horror by numbers flick it can manage. It succeeded, but as you can tell by the rating, that still doesn't make it a good film.

    Okay, so the positives. The acting is pretty reasonable and this lot, including Kane can probably do much better horrors in the future. The special effects, while simply being generic for this day and age were also pretty reasonable. Nothing ground breaking or stand out impressive for either of these. Probably the most notable thing was Kane himself, but it's not a great surprise seeing as his day job is to play a Psycho.

    On the downside however the whole plot was so incredibly bog standard you get bored with it early on, stop really caring who's going to live or die and just try and enjoy the visuals. The story naturally revolves around a couple of young but tough women (like that's new) who have a tendency of getting all the men around them killed. The older characters are very peripheral and somewhat wasted. But that's part of the hangover from the "scary movie" sub-genre, which fortunately seems to be slowly fading into the distance and morphing into marginally better films such as this.

    The worst part of the movie was the supposed plot twist. This was something that if you were to ask yourself what the most obvious, generic thing that could happen would be, you'll have guessed it long before it happens.

    Anyway, as I said the film is at least honest and for a short disposable hack and slash horror it's pretty reasonable. Having said that, there are better films even in for B-Movie slashers. So really, unless your a WWE fan, or you really like this kind of movie, I wouldn't bother.
    4christian123

    A decent by-the-numbers slasher film

    Eight teen convicts are brought to the abandoned Blackwell Hotel to clean it out as community service. They soon discover that it's the residence of a hulking psychopath (Kane) who has a thing for pulling out and collecting eyeballs. It doesn't help that the guard watching over them (Steven Vidler) has had a previous run-in with the beast four years earlier.

    A guilty pleasure of mine are slasher films. Most of them are poorly directed and acted but they still hold some appeal and entertainment value. See No Evil is a good example of this. It features atrocious writing and acting but the death scenes are pretty good and the movie proves to be entertaining. The premise sounds like a mixture between Friday the 13th, Saw 2 and Halloween: Resurrection. I really liked the idea but it didn't work out too well. It was really just a bunch of clichés and everything was predictable. Screenwriter Dan Madigan just focused on the death scenes and nothing else apparently. The death scenes themselves are pretty good and gruesome. Director Gregory Dark did a good job with them and he came up with some creative kills.

    The acting is pretty bland and unremarkable. This is because all of the characters are one dimensional and we don't know much about them. It was hard to feel for these people because they were pretty unlikable. Kane is surprisingly mediocre. I was expecting his on screen presence to be scarier but he didn't do that good of a job. A second rate Jason Voorhees, if you will. The rest of the actors are relatively unknown and this film will probably neither help nor hurt their careers.

    While the death scenes are gory, they aren't necessary scary. There's really no suspense just some gory death scenes. Because of this, the movie doesn't hold much of a repeat value. Also, if you don't like slasher films then don't waste your time with this one. It will do little to change your opinion. In the end, See No Evil is a decent slasher film but it is generic and forgettable so it's not exactly worth watching. Rating 6/10
    6wrudd

    Good for it's genre

    As far as mad stalker/Friday the 13th/Halloween type movies go I think it was effective. Kane makes a good "monster". The cast of unknowns seems to try reasonable hard. There were some gross-out gory parts, some effect atmosphere, some unexpected ways of getting killed, and for me anyway a surprise in some of the twists. It's a B-movie but in that context it works for me. The theater was full and the crowd seemed to get into it. If you want to see a "maniac versus a group of teen agers" movie this is a good one to see.

    The set up for the villain is effective and they actually did a good job in explaining how he got as messed up as he did. Actually by the end of the movie you get enough flash backs that you think he was twisted into shape and not just born evil ala Freddy or Jason.

    Altri elementi simili

    Il collezionista di occhi 2
    4,7
    Il collezionista di occhi 2
    Hatchet
    5,7
    Hatchet
    Le colline sanguinano
    5,4
    Le colline sanguinano
    Hatchet II
    5,5
    Hatchet II
    See No Evil
    8,0
    See No Evil
    See No Evil: The Moors Murders
    7,0
    See No Evil: The Moors Murders
    Laid to Rest
    5,2
    Laid to Rest
    Patto di sangue
    5,2
    Patto di sangue
    Hatchet III
    5,6
    Hatchet III
    Victor Crowley
    5,5
    Victor Crowley
    San Valentino di sangue
    5,4
    San Valentino di sangue
    See No Evil
    7,1
    See No Evil

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      Glenn Jacobs (Kane) has stated that the best thing about making this movie (due to the hectic amount of traveling as a professional wrestler) was the opportunity it gave him to sleep in the same bed for two months.
    • Blooper
      In one of the last scenes, when one of the women has the ability to shoot the murderer, the pistol is suddenly empty. The Glock pistol that was used is a semi-automatic weapon that uses the recoil of the last shot to load another bullet. If the last shot is fired the breech block slides back and won't slide forward again as seen in the movie. She (and the audience) would have been able to see that there is clearly no bullet left in the pistol instead of recognizing it after pulling the trigger.
    • Citazioni

      Jacob Goodnight: I see now...

    • Curiosità sui crediti
      Among the end credits, after the cast and stunt list, there's a scene where a dog urinates in Jacob's empty eye socket
    • Versioni alternative
      German DVD release by Kinowelt was cut by 11 seconds (cell phone scene) to secure a light SPIO: JK approval (meaning they were allowed to advertise the film, a normal approval would result in prohibition of advertising). Additionally, a FSK-18 version was created for retail chains, which was cut by 3 minutes.
    • Connessioni
      Edited into Il collezionista di occhi 2 (2014)
    • Colonne sonore
      X'ed
      Written by David Banner & Kamikaze

      Performed by David Banner featuring Kamikaze

      Courtesy of SRC Records / Universal Records

      Under license from Universal Music Enterprises

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti19

    • How long is See No Evil?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 28 luglio 2006 (Italia)
    • Paesi di origine
      • Australia
      • Stati Uniti
    • Sito ufficiale
      • Lions Gate Films (United States)
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Maligno
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    • Aziende produttrici
      • World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)
      • Eye Scream Man Productions
      • Eye Scream Productions
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 8.000.000 USD (previsto)
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 15.032.800 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 4.581.233 USD
      • 21 mag 2006
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 18.707.966 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 24min(84 min)
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • DTS
      • Dolby
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.