VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
76.591
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Elle Woods si reca a Washington, D.C. per unirsi allo staff di una deputata al fine di approvare un disegno di legge per vietare i test sugli animali.Elle Woods si reca a Washington, D.C. per unirsi allo staff di una deputata al fine di approvare un disegno di legge per vietare i test sugli animali.Elle Woods si reca a Washington, D.C. per unirsi allo staff di una deputata al fine di approvare un disegno di legge per vietare i test sugli animali.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 vittorie e 5 candidature totali
Gregorio
- Mailroom Guy
- (as Zia Harris)
Recensioni in evidenza
Legally Blonde 2: Red, White and Blonde is a very disappointing sequel as it fails to deliver the laughs. Elle Woods is now a rising young lawyer at a great firm, balancing a demanding a career with preparations for her wedding to the man of her dreams. But when she finds out that her beloved dog Bruiser's family members are being used as cosmetic test subjects by one of her firm's own clients, she stands up for their rights--and is promptly fired. Ms. Woods decides to go to Washington to take matters into her own hands. The plot actually had some potential, unfortunately the execution was very poor. The original wasn't an Oscar quality film, it was just a fun film to watch. The sequel isn't as fun nor is it fun in general. It was pretty much the same as the first movie and so it was a pretty pointless sequel. Reese Witherspoon returns and she does a good job but she's working with a weak script. The supporting cast isn't very good as none add much to the film. Sally Field is a very good actress but her talents are wasted. Luke Wilson's character isn't very interesting and Jennifer Coolidge tries to hard most of the time. Regina King is a new addition to the cast and she does an okay job, nothing memorable though. Missing from this sequel is Selma Blair, this doesn't matter though as her character wasn't really needed. Charles Herman-Wurmfeld replaces Robert Luketic as the director and does a very bad job. The running time is a brief 95 minutes though it feels a lot longer then that. The film felt a lot longer since the movie just wasn't funny. There were a few funny moments though most of the jokes this film delivered were, at best, small chuckles. Do a few funny moments redeem this film? No, this sequel is one of the worst sequels of 2003 and one of the worst comedies of 2003. In the end, this sequel may seem funny but I assure you it isn't. Rating 4.3/10, rent the original instead.
There can be little doubt, this movie is an inferior follow-up to Legally Blonde. Too many characters are recycled and made to look cute, but it doesn't work as well as when it was fresh. Still, Reese Witherspoon has created in 'Elle Woods' a character that is just fun to watch. She never stays down long, always picking herself up with a fresh approach until she achieves her goal. I look at it like a 'Roadrunner' cartoon, but with real people. It is silly and implausible, but funny. In this case the 'bad guys' are the US Congress in a parody of it's habit of making backroom deals and taking care of supporters to guarantee reelection, even if nothing is done to help constituents. Elle Woods finds that animals are used to test cosmetics, and her quest is to get a law passed that will make it illegal. Nothing more than cute, funny fluff.
I loved the original Legally Blonde, and I knew going into this movie that it wouldn't be as good as the original. My only solace lies in the thought that this could have been so much worse than it was.
First, LB2 relied too much on the Elle-Woods-Fish-Out-Of-Water plot. It should have portrayed the main character as being savvy enough to take advantage of the fact that her opponents always underestimated her. After all, she's been out of law school a couple of years already, surely she'd have learned that much, right?
Second, the plot itself was too contrived. There wasn't a single believable character in the show, and Witherspoon was just a caricature of the original movie's heroine.
But I still managed to enjoy most of the show. I even chuckled in a couple of scenes. But I winced at far too many other scenes, and the climactic speech to Congress was abominable.
I've seen worse remakes than this, but I think the producers missed an opportunity to make a good film instead of a knock-off.
First, LB2 relied too much on the Elle-Woods-Fish-Out-Of-Water plot. It should have portrayed the main character as being savvy enough to take advantage of the fact that her opponents always underestimated her. After all, she's been out of law school a couple of years already, surely she'd have learned that much, right?
Second, the plot itself was too contrived. There wasn't a single believable character in the show, and Witherspoon was just a caricature of the original movie's heroine.
But I still managed to enjoy most of the show. I even chuckled in a couple of scenes. But I winced at far too many other scenes, and the climactic speech to Congress was abominable.
I've seen worse remakes than this, but I think the producers missed an opportunity to make a good film instead of a knock-off.
I went to a free screening and demanded a refund.
I was so long ago And it haunts me still. Seriously Don't.
I mean it The first was OK.. But this.
I mean, it had a sub plot about some dogs.. And there was some pink clothing.
I'm sorry. I watched most of it through my fingers.
I warn everyone about this movie.
I hope you heed mine.
Please beware my warning. You cannot Unsee this horror..
Turn back while you still can.
I was so long ago And it haunts me still. Seriously Don't.
I mean it The first was OK.. But this.
I mean, it had a sub plot about some dogs.. And there was some pink clothing.
I'm sorry. I watched most of it through my fingers.
I warn everyone about this movie.
I hope you heed mine.
Please beware my warning. You cannot Unsee this horror..
Turn back while you still can.
Reese Goes to Washington. We discover that, beneath a very very thin veneer of protocol, politics in DC largely functions EXACTLY like a sorority! Isn't that cool? How FUN! But how on earth will Reese figure out to puncture this veneer of propriety and protocol that prevents people from doing the right thing and allows bureacracy and EEEEEEVIL to propogate through the legislative halls of our great land? well, i don't want to spoil the whole movie for you! But guess what? The really cool and honest Legislator that Reese goes to work for? She's kind of EEEEEEVIL!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizReese Witherspoon was pregnant during filming.
- BlooperIn La rivincita delle bionde (2001), Elle graduates from Law School in 2004, yet in this movie they make several references to the fact that it is 2003.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Wheel of Fortune: Wheel Goes to the Movies 3 (2003)
- Colonne sonoreMe Against the World
Written by Max Hsu, Matt Dally and Tricia Brock
Performed by Superchick (as Superchic[k])
Courtesy of InPop Records
Under license from InPop Records, Inc.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Legally Blonde 2
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 45.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 90.186.328 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 22.220.670 USD
- 6 lug 2003
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 124.914.842 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 35 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What was the official certification given to Una bionda in carriera (2003) in Spain?
Rispondi