[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Godsend - Il male è rinato

Titolo originale: Godsend
  • 2004
  • PG-13
  • 1h 42min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
27.030
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Robert De Niro, Greg Kinnear, and Rebecca Romijn in Godsend - Il male è rinato (2004)
Trailer
Riproduci trailer2:00
1 video
29 foto
AzioneDrammaFantascienzaFantasiaOrroreThriller

Una coppia accetta di far clonare il figlio deceduto, sotto la supervisione di un enigmatico dottore. Dopo diversi anni dalla rinascita, iniziano a verificarsi cose insolite.Una coppia accetta di far clonare il figlio deceduto, sotto la supervisione di un enigmatico dottore. Dopo diversi anni dalla rinascita, iniziano a verificarsi cose insolite.Una coppia accetta di far clonare il figlio deceduto, sotto la supervisione di un enigmatico dottore. Dopo diversi anni dalla rinascita, iniziano a verificarsi cose insolite.

  • Regia
    • Nick Hamm
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Mark Bomback
  • Star
    • Robert De Niro
    • Greg Kinnear
    • Rebecca Romijn
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    4,8/10
    27.030
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Nick Hamm
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Mark Bomback
    • Star
      • Robert De Niro
      • Greg Kinnear
      • Rebecca Romijn
    • 205Recensioni degli utenti
    • 49Recensioni della critica
    • 24Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Video1

    Godsend
    Trailer 2:00
    Godsend

    Foto29

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 23
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali41

    Modifica
    Robert De Niro
    Robert De Niro
    • Richard Wells
    Greg Kinnear
    Greg Kinnear
    • Paul Duncan
    Rebecca Romijn
    Rebecca Romijn
    • Jessie Duncan
    • (as Rebecca Romijn-Stamos)
    Cameron Bright
    Cameron Bright
    • Adam Duncan
    Merwin Mondesir
    Merwin Mondesir
    • Maurice, Young Thug
    Sava Drayton
    Sava Drayton
    • Young Thug #2
    Jake Simons
    • Dan Sandler
    Elle Downs
    Elle Downs
    • Clara Sandler
    Edie Inksetter
    Edie Inksetter
    • Footlocker Cashier
    Raoul Bhaneja
    Raoul Bhaneja
    • Samir Miklat
    Jenny Cooper
    Jenny Cooper
    • Sandra Shaw
    • (as Jenny Levine)
    Thomas Chambers
    • Jordan Shaw
    Munro Chambers
    Munro Chambers
    • Max Shaw
    Jeff Christensen
    • Hal Shaw
    Deborah Odell
    Deborah Odell
    • Tanya
    Jordan Scherer
    • Roy Hazen
    Ingrid Veninger
    • Mrs. Farr
    Al Bernstein
    • Godsend Receptionist
    • Regia
      • Nick Hamm
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Mark Bomback
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti205

    4,827K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    4sddavis63

    Aside From A Modestly Effective Twist This Is Pretty Weak

    Aside from a modestly effective twist near the end of the movie regarding the real identity of the child "Adam," this was a bland movie pretty much the whole way through. "Adam" applies to two characters, actually. The first being the child killed in a car accident near the beginning of the movie, and the second being his "replacement." After the first Adam's death, his parents are approached by a famous doctor (played by Robert De Niro in one of his more forgettable performances) who offers to use the knowledge that he's gained through laboratory experiments to clone Adam. The result is pretty much what you'd expect in this kind of movie. The new Adam seems to have memories of his previous life and seems from the beginning just a little "off." You realize that there's more going on here than meets the eye - the figure of Zachary (the boy in Adam's dreams) really doesn't seem to connect with the story, but to me the disconnect was so great that I settled for remaining confused rather than even trying to connect Zachary with anything. The movie tries to frighten with assorted chills, but never really succeeds in that regard. The twist (as I mentioned above) is modestly effective (I hadn't seen it coming) but everything that came before was so bland that I really didn't care by the time the twist came out. The ending was too open ended - there were at least two possibilities left open for continuing the story in a sequel that just seemed too wide open. Fortunately, the sequel never came. I'd have appreciated a bit more closure to this.

    This is a mediocre movie at best. I always give a bit of extra credit for a twist that catches me off guard, but it's still mediocre.
    6claudio_carvalho

    Reasonable Horror Movie With Unsatisfactory Conclusion

    The teacher Pauld Duncan (Greg Kinnear), the photographer Jessie Duncan (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos) and their eight years old son Adam Duncan (Cameron Bright) composes a simple but very happy medium class family. On the day after his eighth birthday, Adam is hit and killed by a car, shaking the stability of the Duncan's family. Some days later, a mysterious doctor Richard Wells (Robert De Niro) approaches to the couple and proposes to make a clone of their deceased son. A new Adam is born, but after his eighth birthday, the boy has horrible nightmares and a weird behavior at school. The reproduction process hides a deep secret, which affects the life of the Duncans. "Godsend" was a great deception for me, since I expected much more from this film. The first three quarters have some flaws, but is scary and hooks the attention of the viewer. However, the conclusion of the story is horrible! I believe that even the director Nick Hamm was not satisfied with the end of the movie, since the American DVD presents four (4) alternative endings, which one of them worse than the original commercial and moralist one. My vote is six.

    Title (Brazil): "O Enviado" ("The Envoy")
    4JAKastner

    The Moose Hole - Review of Godsend

    We've all lost somebody close to us at some point in our lives whether it be a parent, a grandparent, cousin, a friend, a wife, or a girlfriend, it's happened to everyone. But for a parent to lose a child, especially in the prime of their life, has to be one of the most horrible experiences a parent can endure. The whole concept of the parent outliving the child is just so radically outrageous that no normal human being could ever fathom how such a person would feel, unless they themselves lost a child. In years past, one would lose a loved one, the time of grieving would take its course, and then that would be that. But times have changed and so have the methods of science, where a person would lose a loved one forever now the deceased can be brought back to life through the experimental method of cloning or at least that is the thought. Sounds more like some ungodly science-fiction novel right? Not anymore. Now that scientists have experimented on everything from sheep to mice to rabbits they now want to move on to humans, with some radical and inscrutable groups claiming they have already achieved the unthinkable … the birth of the first clone human being. Sooner or later, the moral convictions of mankind will contend with radical science to determine whether or not man can conquer death.

    The story centers on a couple who decide to take the advice of a radical scientist and have their dead child cloned in order to return to their once happy life. Jesse and Paul may not have the most high paying jobs, the best house, or even the best neighborhood but there is one thing in there life that they would never be able to live without, their son Adam. Things within the Duncan household seem to be looking up with Paul being offered a better job which would require the family to move to a better quality neighborhood. But life takes a tragic turn when, just a day after his eighth birthday, Adam is fatally injured in a car accident and dies practically in his mother's arms. With their whole world turned upside-down and memories of their dead son everywhere in their home, the couple turn to Dr. Richard Wells, a radical genetics researcher, who claims to be able to take cells from the body of their dead son, place them in an egg from Jesse, and produce an identical version of Adam. All the couple would need to do is move into a new house, graciously provide by Dr. Wells himself, and promise not to tell anyone about the controversial procedure they are about to embark on. Once Adam is `re-born', the couple's life returns back to way things were before the accident … that is until young Adam crosses the age at which the original Adam died. From there the child has sleepless nights, a sudden lapse in emotions, and disturbing night-terrors that both frighten and confuse his parents. Could this be their just punishment for venturing into the realm of God or is there something else behind Adam's bewildering behavior? The story of Godsend is nothing more then a half-assed attempt at copying true a horror classic, Rosemary's Baby, and even The Others. What starts out as an intriguing insight into the moral and ethical complications behind the concept of cloning turns into an uneven and flat attempt at cheap thrills that leaves you with more question then when you started with.

    The cast is mainly centered on only four characters and, unfortunately for the film, only one performs up to the standards expected of the movie-going public. Despite the fact that Robert DeNiro's character is a great opportunity for the outstanding veteran actor to add mad-scientist/researcher to his resume, the audience doesn't get as much of him as they would want which is sad since he is the only truly interesting character in the film. The filmmakers could have done a much better job at providing more information on character even if it was just revealed at the end of the film but they don't even do that. It is an absolutely pathetic sight to see the best thing a film has going for it, based on the cast, leave you totally confused based on his actions since no motivation or reasons are given to you for him doing what he has done within the course of the two hour feature. Rebecca Romijn-Stamos, who has really built up her film career over the past couple of years, is once again reduced to the second-hand eye candy is this film, including a scene where she is walking through the house in a white see-through sweatshirt that clearly shows her without a bra, which is just an absolute embarrassment to see in a film now adays … Come on people! Grow up! Greg Kinnear is pretty convincing as Paul Duncan but the character itself is a problem. He's a biologist but it takes him the longest time to figure out the thought that what may be wrong with the new Adam may be in his genes. Where did he get his college degree from? And Cameron Bright, who plays both the original and cloned version of Adam Duncan, attempts to come off as a creepy-cute kid but there nothing creepy or cutesy about him, he's just plain annoying. His `possessed' child voice and deep stares into absolutely nothingness feel like complete rip-offs of classic horror films, and not good ones at that.

    Overall, what should be a film attempting to answer the moral and ethical issues brought up the revolutionary concept of human cloning only leaves you with the question of why you would pay eight dollars for an unimaginative and bewildering horror knock-off. Even if you go into this film giving the filmmakers the benefit of the doubt for ripping-off Rosemary's Baby, you'll still have problems with the film's uneven and utterly confusing second half. There are so many things wrong with this film that it is hard to decide where to start. Let's first focus on the reason why the couple would want to clone their son in the first place. The subject is brought up early in the film but the wife refuses to have another child and pushes the husband toward the cloning concept. If they had left it at that then that would be fine but later on in the film they show the couple having sex, before being broken up by the screams of their cloned son. Oh! You're opposed to the having a child through moral methods but not to having the occasional `wink-wink'? Another problem is that the film tends to throw bits and pieces of religion into the film's background (the most obvious being the `Godsend Institute') and yet the question of morals and ethics within a religious context are clearly excluded from almost any conversations. And how unsatisfying and completely confusing can you make an ending for a film that was practically a waste of time to begin with? Somehow the filmmakers managed to screw that up as well (without giving anything away, practically nothing is answered). What prevented this film from getting an absolute failure would have to be its intriguing first half and engaging performance from Robert DeNiro but not even those things can resurrect this beaten and bloody horse picture.

    My Rating: ** out of 5 (Grade: D)
    bob the moo

    Unimaginative and boring chiller that lacks intelligence, originality and chills

    Paul and Jessie Duncan live in a rough part of the city but are happy with their lives and their young son Adam. However tragedy strikes when Adam is killed in a car accident right in front of Jessie, leaving the couple broken and lost. At their lowest point they are met by a former tutor of Jessie's, enigmatic doctor Richard Wells. Infamous for this genetic work, Wells claims that he can use DNA from the dead Adam to essentially produce a clone. With Jessie no longer able to have children, the couple agree to the illegal and experimental procedure (which also involves moving to a big empty house) and the new born is soon with them. All is great until Adam reaches eight years old and suddenly the nightmares starts and Adam's behaviour changes.

    A few years ago cloning became a hot topic and produced several interesting debates over the moral and ethical issues surrounding it. There were no easy answers and it was/is a topic that is hard to hold a clear view on unless you happen to have it decided for you by your religion. Writer Bomback takes this interesting hotbed of ethical debate and churns out a modern twist on the Omen with few original ideas and nothing of any real interest. The plot just tries to engineer plenty of "creepy" moments with the thinnest of ideas behind them and, as a result I didn't really care that much about any of it. Hamm's solid direction is OK but he can't add much in the way of real chills.

    Kinnear and Romijn make for an unlikely couple and they don't have a very convincing relationship. Neither of them have much to work with; they do the basics with the script but they can't raise it and don't even suggest that they would produce the sort of emotions you'd expect from a couple seeing their dead son recreated in front of them. Bright is suitably creepy and he does what is asked of him – the rest isn't his fault. De Niro phones in his performance; he isn't terrible but you can't help feel that he is worth more than this and that he surely can't need the money that much.

    Overall then a roundly poor chiller that offers very little other than unimaginative and unoriginal ideas. Not chilling in the least and it just plods its way towards a pointless and annoying conclusion.
    5ma-cortes

    Mediocre horror film about the science's risks

    The picture concerns a young couple (Greg Kinnear and Rebecca Romijin Stamos) who after the death their son (Cameron Bright) by accident are convinced by a doctor (Robert de Niro) to be cloned and then, years later his rebirth , strange events happen . The storyline has a twisted plot and at the final there are extraordinary surprises. From the film presentation to the end the tension and intrigue are continued .

    The motion picture blends terror , suspense , strong emotions , shocks and is slightly slow-moving and that's why it is a little boring. Besides, being mostly developed at interior scenarios , without barely outdoors . In the picture there's a spooky and creepy atmosphere with a lot of screams , shocks and a scary musical background . The yarn takes ideas from ¨Sixth sense¨ and ¨Hide and seek¨(also with Robert de Niro and in similar interpretation) . The acting by main actors is good , but there are scarcely secondary actors . Cinematography by Kramer Morgenthau and musical score by Brian Tyler create a ghostly and frightening atmosphere . The pic was regularly directed by Nick Hamm. The film will appeal to horror enthusiasts and Robert de Niro fans . Rating: average but passable.

    Altri elementi simili

    Colpevole d'omicidio
    6,1
    Colpevole d'omicidio
    Nascosto nel buio
    5,9
    Nascosto nel buio
    Il ponte di San Luis Rey
    5,0
    Il ponte di San Luis Rey
    Stone
    5,4
    Stone
    Il respiro del diavolo
    5,7
    Il respiro del diavolo
    La notte e la città
    5,8
    La notte e la città
    L'assoluzione
    6,3
    L'assoluzione
    Oggi sposi
    4,7
    Oggi sposi
    15 minuti - Follia omicida a New York
    6,1
    15 minuti - Follia omicida a New York
    Disastro a Hollywood
    5,6
    Disastro a Hollywood
    The Darkness
    4,5
    The Darkness
    Lettere d'amore
    6,3
    Lettere d'amore

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      Robert De Niro had originally planned on merely providing a brief cameo for the film. However, after Director Nick Hamm heard De Niro would be interested in his project, he asked De Niro to participate in a few more scenes that were all filmed within a week. De Niro later regretted this because his name was "splashed over all the advertisements".
    • Blooper
      When Paul Duncan is driving, a Canadian flag is just about visible in the background.
    • Citazioni

      Adam Duncan: Dad, did I die?

    • Connessioni
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: 13 Going on 30/Mean Girls/Shaolin Soccer/Close Your Eyes/Man on Fire (2004)
    • Colonne sonore
      Predictable
      Written by Norman Jones

      Performed by Norman Jones and Duane Neillson

      Published by Music NV Publishing (ASCAP)

      Courtesy of 2003 Music NV

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti26

    • How long is Godsend?Powered by Alexa
    • What is 'Godsend' about?
    • Is 'Godsend' based on a book?
    • How does cloning work?

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 10 settembre 2004 (Italia)
    • Paesi di origine
      • Canada
      • Stati Uniti
    • Sito ufficiale
      • Central Partnership (Russia)
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Godsend
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Milton, Ontario, Canada
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Lionsgate
      • Artists Production Group (APG)
      • 2929 Productions
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Budget
      • 25.000.000 USD (previsto)
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 14.379.751 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 6.900.000 USD
      • 2 mag 2004
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 30.120.671 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 42min(102 min)
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • Proporzioni
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.