[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app

sddavis63

Iscritto in data apr 2000
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.

Distintivi3

Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Scopri i badge

Valutazioni2145

Valutazione di sddavis63
Shark - Il primo squalo
5,73
Shark - Il primo squalo
Woman of the Hour
6,69
Woman of the Hour
Un alibi perfetto
5,86
Un alibi perfetto
La notte arriva sempre
5,99
La notte arriva sempre
Papillon
7,28
Papillon
Il mio anno a Oxford
5,91
Il mio anno a Oxford
Sleeping Dogs
6,23
Sleeping Dogs
La guerra di domani
6,66
La guerra di domani
Black Phone
6,98
Black Phone
Lucy
6,42
Lucy
Letters to Juliet
6,56
Letters to Juliet
Tu partirai con me
7,27
Tu partirai con me
The Tribe
5,75
The Tribe
Fractured
6,58
Fractured
Beautiful Boy
7,47
Beautiful Boy
The Six Triple Eight
6,78
The Six Triple Eight
Last Breath
6,66
Last Breath
Harbinger Down - Terrore tra i ghiacci
4,63
Harbinger Down - Terrore tra i ghiacci
Unfrosted: storia di uno snack americano
5,58
Unfrosted: storia di uno snack americano
Al vertice della tensione
6,55
Al vertice della tensione
Killing Ground
5,85
Killing Ground
Il domani tra di noi
6,46
Il domani tra di noi
Scream
7,46
Scream
The Reef
5,84
The Reef
Kingdom of the Spiders
5,76
Kingdom of the Spiders

Recensioni2136

Valutazione di sddavis63
Shark - Il primo squalo

Shark - Il primo squalo

5,7
3
  • 20 ago 2025
  • Standard Creature Feature Of No Great Note

    I did have the thought about halfway through this: why not just call in the Chinese Navy to blast this thing with some torpedoes and be rid of it? I mean, in spite of what was said, this wasn't happening "in the middle of the ocean." It was 200 miles off the Chinese coast. International waters, sure - but why not call in the Chinese Navy? They're not that far away. Well, that was dealt with later - it's hard to get the Navy to take you seriously when you tell them there's a prehistoric giant shark on the loose.

    And there you have the basic story. This is sort of like "Jaws" on steroids. I'm no scientist, but this still struck me as being based on some pretty way out science - like the bottom of the Mariana Trench (the deepest part of Earth's oceans) isn't actually the bottom of the Mariana Trench? There's some weird barrier sort of thing that everyone thought was the bottom but wasn't the bottom? But - we've been to the bottom of the Mariana Trench. The bottom is the bottom, it's not some weird barrier we thought was the bottom. OK. Weird science. You kind of need that to have a creature feature, I guess. And that's what this is.

    You don't expect stellar performances from a creature feature - and you don't get them in "The Meg." For the most part I found the performances lacklustre, and didn't feel any real connection between any of the characters. Jason Statham was stereotypically Jason Statham, Bingbing Li was completely lacking in anything that would have made her character compelling and Robert Taylor must have fallen on some really hard times with the end of "Longmire" to sign up for this. There's not really much point going on further about the cast. The star of a creature feature is the creature. This creature? The giant and prehistoric shark called a Megalodon? Meh. Too obviously CGI in my opinion. I can't say I found it particularly frightening. You also expect some attempts at humour to be thrown in to a movie like this - for the most part they fell flat, and the Meg's attack on the crowded Chinese beach? It was a giant "Jaws" scenario. (At least Pippin somehow survived!) The funniest thing was that, as a kid who liked the old Irwin Allen TV shows, I thought the mini submersibles or whatever they were called vaguely resembled the flying sub from "Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea" - except it didn't fly, it just submerged.

    For all that, for whatever reason, it did keep me watching all the way through. I was interested in how it would turn out if not enthralled by the overall story, cast or characters. I guess that's worth something. It earns this movie 3/10 from me.
    Woman of the Hour

    Woman of the Hour

    6,6
    9
  • 20 ago 2025
  • Highlighted By Superb Performances And A Great Directorial Debut For Anna Kendrick

    Un alibi perfetto

    Un alibi perfetto

    5,8
    6
  • 18 ago 2025
  • Anti-climactic And With Bland Performances, But A Story That Has Just Enough To Keep You Watching

    I would say first of all that I liked this movie. It's a remake of a 1956 film of the same name - a film I've never seen, so I had no preconceived notions going into this; no real idea of how the story would unfold. I only knew that this was a remake. That's important, because I'm going to start this review off by saying that the "climax" of the movie was, for me, a bit of a letdown - since I saw the twist coming from very early on and it didn't take me at all by surprise. And since I was pretty sure how this was going to turn out, I was more interested in the ride - how were we going to get to the actual twist at the end? And, overall, the ride was a pretty good one.

    It's the story of an investigative reporter (played by Jesse Metcalf, who seemed a bit overwhelmed by the role to be honest) who becomes convinced that a high profile DA (played by Michael Douglas) is planting and manipulating evidence in order to secure convictions against people who were wrongly accused as part of his quest to become Governor. CJ (the reporter) comes up with a wild plan to get himself charged for a murder based on circumstantial evidence, along with video that would exonerate him by demonstrating that evidence was planted. There are a lot of turns in this that do lead up to the twist ending, so even if you do have a sense of where it's all leading (as I did) it's still a movie that holds your attention.

    Having said that, aside from wondering about the fate of both CJ and Hunter (the DA) the movie is strangely lacking in any sustained tension. The two tensest moments revolve around the secondary character of a corrupt police detective who's in league with Hunter - his car chase of CJ's friend and colleague Corey, and his pursuit through a parking lot of CJ's girlfriend Ella (played by Amber Tamblyn, and who was also the only character in the movie that I found myself truly caring about) - a prosecutor colleague of Hunter who becomes convinced that her boss is up to no good. When a couple of scenes involving car chases are the most suspenseful parts of a movie - well, that says something. And beyond those two scenes I wouldn't call this an overly suspenseful movie at all.

    It's OK. Aside from a general lack of tension or suspense the story has its moments and is well enough put together to keep you watching. Neither Metcalf nor Tamblyn struck me as actors with the presence or charisma to fit easily into lead roles in a big screen production and even Douglas came across as a bit bland. There was nothing noteworthy about his portrayal of Hunter. It also grated on me that CJ and Corey kept talking about winning a Pulitzer (they were TV reporters - TV reporters don't get Pulitzers!) Beyond that, it was a decent story but not an especially memorable one. (6/10)
    Visualizza tutte le recensioni

    Check-in1

    • Machine Gun Preacher
      4 gen 2013

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.